Percutaneous handling of coronary lesions >20mm through stents. Is there a first choice strategy?

OBJECTIVE - This study compared the early and late results of the use of one single stent with those of the use of multiple stents in patients with lesions longer than 20mm. METHODS - Prospective assessment of patients electively treated with stents, with optimal stent deployment and followed-up for more than 3 months. From February '94 to January '98, 215 patients with lesions >20mm were treated. These patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: Group A - 105 patients (49%) with one stent implanted; Group B - 110 patients (51%) with multiple stents implanted. RESULTS - The mean length of the lesions was 26mm in group A (21-48mm) versus 29mm in group B (21-52mm) (p=0.01). Major complications occurred in one patient (0.9%) in group A (subacute thrombosis, myocardial infarctionand death) and in 2 patients (1.8%) in group B (one emergency surgery and one myocardial infarction) (p=NS). The results of the late follow-up period (>6 months) were similar for both groups (group A = 82% vs group B = 76%; p=NS), and we observed an event-free survical in 89% of the patients in group A and in 91% of the patients in group B (p=NS). Angina (group A = 11% vs group B = 7%) and lesion revascularization (group A = 5% vs group B = 6%; p=NS) also occurred in a similar percentage. No infarction or death was observed in the late follow-up period; restenosis was identified in 33% and 29% of the patients in groups A and B, respectively (p=NS). CONCLUSION - The results obtained using one stent and using multiple stents were similar; the greater cost-effectiveness of one stent implantation, however, seems to make this strategy the first choice.

[Influence of the clinical presentation on immediate and long-term results after rotational atherectomy]. / Influência do quadro clínico nos resultados imediatos e tardios após aterectomia rotacional.

PURPOSE: To analyse the influence of unstable coronary syndromes (UCS) in the early and late prognosis after rotational atherectomy (RA). METHODS: We treated 236 patients with RA between Aug/1992 and May/1996. Patients were divided into two groups: A) stable coronary syndromes 120 (51%) patients; B) UCS: 116 (49%) patients. DEFINITIONS: 1) procedure success (PS)--lesion success in all locations were RA use was attempted, without a major complication; 2) late coronary events (LCE)--angina, MI, additional revascularization or death. RESULTS: There was a significant predominance of age > 70 (A = 14% x B = 24%, p = 0.03) in B and previous MI (A = 32% x B = 11%, p = 0.0001) in A. Other characteristics were similar in both groups, including complex lesions (type B2/C), which were observed in 77% A stenosis and 80% B lesions. PS was 95% in A and 92% in B (p = NS). In-hospital major complications were observed in 2.5% A and 4.3% B patients, (p = NS). One patient died in each group. A and B patients had similar time of follow-up. LCE occurred in 25% A and 39% B patients (p = 0.002). Recurrence of angina (36% x 23%; p = 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (29% x 18%; p = 0.03) were also more frequently required in B cases. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that UCS (group A) does not implicate in worse acute results after RA. However, UCS patients present greater incidence of late coronary events, particularly recurrence of angina and target-lesion revascularization.

[Efficacy of repeat coronary dilatation in patients with restenosis of the anterior descending artery]. / Eficácia da redilatação coronária em portadores de reestenose da artéria descendente anterior.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical characteristics, acute and long term results of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for restenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LDA) METHODS: We studied 113 patients, 79% male, mean age 59 years, 49.5% had stable angina, with single vessel proximal LDA disease undergoing repeat PTCA for a first restenosis from January/88 to December/92. We examined the in hospital outcome (success rate and complications) and long term follow up (angina status, occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI), death and need for repeat PTCA or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) of this subgroup. RESULTS: Primary success was 96%. Complications included: 1% MI, 1% emergency CABG and 1% procedural death. Follow up data (mean 42 months) was available in 102 (94%) out of 109 patients with successful repeat PTCA: 64 (63%) patients were asymptomatic, 5 (5%) had a MI and 28 (27%) required repeat PTCA or CABG. Actuarial 5 year freedom from death was 94%, freedom from death and MI was 91% and freedom from death, MI and repeat PTCA or CABG was 52%. CONCLUSION: Repeat PTCA is an effective treatment for proximal LAD restenosis with a high success rate, low incidence of procedural complications and provides excellent long term cardiac survival, however repeat revascularization is frequently required.

[Coronary angioplasty in patients with restenosis. Characterization of clinical and angiographic profiles, hospital clinical course, and implications for the selection of patients]. / Angioplastia coronária em pacientes com lesões reestenóticas. Caracterização do perfil clínico e angiográfico, evolução hospitalar e implicações para seleção de pacientes.

PURPOSE: To define the clinical and angiographic profile of patients undergoing to a 2nd or a 3rd coronary angioplaty (PTCA) for the treatment of restenosis, and assess the safety and efficacy of redilatation. METHODS: Patients submitted to PTCA for a 1st (1stRE) or a 2nd (2ndRE) restenosis, from Jan/1980 through Dec/1993, were retrospectively identified, and compared to those undergoing to PTCA for de novo lesions (DN). RESULTS: A total of 5,736 underwent to dilatation of primary lesions, 610 of a 1stRE, and 64 of a 2ndRE. Patients with restenotic lesions had a higher prevalence of diabetes, smoking, history of prior infarction (1stRE e 2ndRE) and hyperlipidemia (2ndRE) as compared with primary lesions (p < 0.05). Besides patients with a 2ndRE had a higher incidence of left ventricular dysfunction, as compared to those with DN or a 1stRE (31.3% with EF < 45% in group 2ndRE, vs 19.8% and 23.1% in groups 1stRE and DN, respectively, p < 0.05). Primary success, infarct rate and mortality were similar in all groups, but emergency bypass surgery was significantly higher in the DN (2.1% vs 0.8% in 1stRE and 0% in 2ndRE, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Restenosis can be effectively treated by redilatation. Patients with clinical and angiographic features predisposing to further recurrence can be better treated with other interventions (i.e., coronary stents, bypass surgery).

[Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty]. / Ineficácia do diltiazem na prevenção da reestenose após angioplastia coronária.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of diltiazem in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Eighty-nine patients who were undergone to successful PTCA, were divided them in 2 groups (G): A) 44 patients (50%) who received diltiazem (180 mg tid) immediately after PTCA and were kept on it for 6 months); B) 45 patients (50%) who received placebo. Fifty two lesions were dilated in GA and 54 in GB. Patients were excluded from analysis for several reasons, including: necessity of diltiazem or others calcium channel blockers use; heart failure, bradicardia, AV block of any degree, PTCA to chronic total occlusion, ostial lesions and AMI less than 30 days prior to PTCA. Patients were randomized to either the active drug or placebo in a double blind fashion. Restenosis was defined as a 50% lesion. Patients underwent late angiography either at 6 months or sooner if clinically indicated. RESULTS: Both G were similar to age > 70 years (A = 7% vs B = 4%-p = NS), sex (A = 13% vs B = 11%-p = NS), stable angina (A = 43% vs B = 51%), unstable angina (A = 57% vs B = 49%-p = NS) and single vessel (A = 91% vs B = 87%-p = NS) or multivessel (A = 9% vs B = 13%-p = NS) PTCA. We studied 39/44 (89%) patients in GA and 43/45 (96%) in GB (p = NS). We observed restenosis in 17/39 (43%) in GA and 16/43 (37%) in GB (p = NS). The restenosis rate per lesion was 39% in GA and 31% in GB (p = NS). CONCLUSION: Diltiazem was ineffective in the prevention of restenosis following PTCA.

[Coronary angioplasty using double balloon in artery of large calibre (hugging balloons)]. / Angioplastia coronária com uso de duplo balão em artéria de grande calibre (hugging balloons).

In this case report the transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed in a oversized right coronary artery with a severe lesion with thrombus inside, using the Hugging balloon technique (two dilatation balloon catheters used simultaneously). This technique achieved minimal residual lesion and had a favorable clinical outcome of the patient.

[Heparin in coronary angioplasty. Randomized study in cases with low risk of acute occlusion]. / Heparina na angioplastia coronária. Estudo randomizado em casos com baixo risco para lclusão aguda.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of heparin in preventing the abrupt closure after coronary angioplasty in low risk patients for this phenomenon. METHODS: In the last 4 years, 525 patients successfully dilated were randomized to receive intravenous heparin (n = 264) or not (n = 261) after the angioplasty. The excluding criteria were contraindications for heparin and risk for abrupt closure (refractory unstable angina, primary coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction, evidence of intracoronary thrombus, intimal tear after the procedure and cases of chronic total occlusions). Both heparin and non heparin groups were similar in respect to female sex (15% x 17%; p = NS), age over 70 years old (7% x 9%; p = NS), previous myocardial infarction (26% x 24%; p = NS), multi-vessel procedures (4% x 7%; p = NS, stable angina (40% x 46%; p = NS), unstable angina (52% x 48%; p = NS) and angioplasty after thrombolytic therapy (8% x 6%; p = NS). RESULTS: The overall incidence of abrupt closure was 2/525 (0.4%), with one case (0.4%) in each group. The in-hospital mortality was 1/525 (0.2%), which occurred in a non-heparin patient, due to a anterior myocardial infarction. Major complications occurred similarly in heparin and non-heparin groups (0.4%). Bleeding complications were observed more frequently in the heparin group (7% x 2%; p = 0.002). All of them were in the catheterization site and none required blood transfusion. Severe systemic bleeding were not observed. CONCLUSION: In patients regarded as low risk for abrupt closure, the incidence of this complication was really low (0.4%) and heparin probably do not prevent it.