Conservative Treatment of Spondylodiscitis: Possible Therapeutic Solution in Case of Failure of Standard Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Spondylodiscitis (SD) is an uncommon disease but not rare, because it represents around 3-5% of all cases of osteomyelitis. Late diagnosis and/or inadequate treatment often cause irreversible damage to cause neurological deficit. Most require only conservative treatment, sometimes a surgical approach is required. AIM: The purpose of this study is to propose a conservative protocol to treat spondylodiscitis when the standard conservative treatment has failed. This alternative treatment has been for a long time at the Codivilla-Putti Institute. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 192 consecutive patients who underwent paravertebral intramuscular injections of antibiotic associated with standard treatment at our Center from January 2010 to December 2015 with SD. Of this 192 patients we selected 98 who had already undergone standard antibiotic therapy at another hospital without resolution of the disease. All patients have performed our protocol that provides a total of 3 cycles, each of 3 weeks, repeated at approximately 5 weeks apart. For each patient we evaluated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), White Blood Cells (WBC) indexes, SF36 and VAS Score at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 22 months (range 60-12), clinical healing was achieved in 87 patients (88,9%) of cases with significant reduction in back pain and functional limitation. The VAS Score and the SF36 were better at the end of treatment compared to previous "GOLD STANDARD" treatments in the previous hospitalization in another hospital. In most cases there were slightly reduced in inflammatory indexes. CONCLUSION: There are no studies in the literature demonstrating the effective efficacy of local infiltrative treatment with antibiotics, associated with standard treatment protocol. We believe that our protocol in treating SD, favors an early functional recovery, and be able to offer more chance of success than the standard treatment.

Hypokalemia during antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections.

PURPOSE: During treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs) with multiple antibiotic therapy, hypokalemia has been reported as a rare side effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for hypokalemia in a cohort of patients treated with multidrug therapy for BJIs, in a single center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 331 clinical files of 150 consecutive patients (65% males; median age 59 years, 95% CI 55-62) admitted repeatedly to our Osteomyelitis Department for treatment of chronic BJIs. Besides surgical debridement, patients received a combination of oral and intravenous antibiotics. Routine laboratory tests were performed at admittance and repeated at least weekly. Possible hypokalemia risk factors were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Progressive kalemia reduction occurred in > 39% of patients during hospitalization; prevalence of marked hypokalemia (K + < 3.5 mEq/l) increased from 5% at admission to 11% (up to 22%) at day 14. Correlated factors were: age ≥ 68 years (p = 0.033), low serum albumin (p = 0.034), treatment with vancomycin (p < 0.001), rifampicin (p = 0.017) and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.001) and use of thiazide (p = 0.007) or loop diuretics (p = 0.029 for K + < 3.5 mEq/l). At multivariate regression analysis, the main determinants of hypokalemia were simultaneous use of diuretics (p = 0.007) and older age (p < 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Appearance of severe hypokalemia is a frequent event among patients treated for BJIs with multiple antibiotic therapy, when this is prescribed in older age patients and associated with simultaneous use of diuretics. Due to possible increase in mortality risk in the short term, particular caution should be paid during intensive antibiotic treatment in these groups of patients.

Peri-Prosthetic Knee Infection Management: Spacers Loaded with Two or Three Antibiotic Agents.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to compare pre-made antibiotic-loaded spacers with two commercially available antibiotic agents and custom-made cements with three antibiotic agents added. We evaluated: (a) the validity of our procedures, (b) the control of the rate of infection in the long term, (c) complications, and (d) quality of life and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 112 consecutively treated patients between January 2010 and December 2013; 56 patients were treated with a pre-formed cement spacer (clindamycin + gentamicin), and 56 patients were treated with a spacer loaded with three antibiotic agents (clindamycin + gentamicin + vancomycin). Demographic data were collected: Classification of infection according to criteria of Cierny-Mader; microbiologic results; number of previous operations; and years of disease. Infection control or relapse after at least 18 months of follow-up was evaluated. Complications were recorded. Every patient completed the SF-36 test and Oxford Knee Score. RESULTS: With a follow-up of 32.87 months (standard deviation 12.04), at the end of treatment, amputation occurred in three of 112 patients because of recurrence of infection, and one patient died from other causes not related to the infection. The study population presented a rate of recurrence of infection of 2.70%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a two stage re-implant with three antibiotic agents added to the spacer should be considered to avoid rescue procedures, especially in patients with multi-resistant micro-organism infections.