Protocol of a Multicenter International Randomized Controlled Manikin Study on Different Protocols of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for laypeople (MANI-CPR).

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death in industrialised countries. Survival depends on prompt identification of cardiac arrest and on the quality and timing of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation. For laypeople, there has been a growing interest on hands-only CPR, meaning continuous chest compression without interruption to perform ventilations. It has been demonstrated that intentional interruptions in hands-only CPR can increase its quality. The aim of this randomised trial is to compare three CPR protocols performed with different intentional interruptions with hands-only CPR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective randomised trial performed in eight training centres. Laypeople who passed a basic life support course will be randomised to one of the four CPR protocols in an 8 min simulated cardiac arrest scenario on a manikin: (1) 30 compressions and 2 s pause; (2) 50 compressions and 5 s pause; (3) 100 compressions and 10 s pause; (4) hands-only. The calculated sample size is 552 people. The primary outcome is the percentage of chest compression performed with correct depth evaluated by a computerised feedback system (Laerdal QCPR). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: . Due to the nature of the study, we obtained a waiver from the Ethics Committee (IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy). All participants will sign an informed consent form before randomisation. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journal. The data collected will also be made available in a public data repository. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02632500.

Evaluation of health status and health-related quality of life in a cohort of Italian children following treatment for a primary brain tumor.

BACKGROUND: This study is a pilot experience aiming to investigate the compliance of an institutional cohort of Italian children treated for a malignant disease and their families in completing the health utilities index2, (HUI2) and the effectiveness of this measured in terms of their health status (HS) and health-related quality of life (HRQL). It specifically, it aimed to compare the HS and the HRQL, as expressed by the HUI2 global utility score, in cohorts of patients who had brain tumors, extra-cerebral solid tumors, or leukemia/lymphoma. PROCEDURE: Fifty survivors of brain tumors, between 8 and 30 years at the time of the assessment ("self") and/or their parents ("proxy"), attending the Pediatric Oncology Out Patient clinic of Padua, Italy, completed the HUI2 questionnaire. Eighty-nine children with acute leukemia/lymphoma and 74 with extra-cerebral solid tumors and/or their parents were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean "self" and "proxy" HUI2 global utility scores in the brain tumor patients were 0.87 and 0.84, respectively, while in the cohorts of children with other solid tumors and leukemia/lymphoma, there were 0.94, 0.91, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. The differences between the HUI2 global utility scores in the "self" and "proxy" assessment within each cohort of children were not statistically significant. In decreasing order of frequency, the attributes affected most commonly were: "emotion," "pain," "sensation," and "cognition" both by "self" and "proxy" assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In this Italian population of childhood cancer survivors the HUI2 questionnaire proved to be a user-friendly tool, which provided information regarding HS and HRQL. A larger cohort of cancer children is needed to confirm the efficacy of the HUI2 questionnaire in distinguishing groups of children on this basis by disease category.