Clinical impact and cost-saving analysis of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention in older patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hospital admission and discharge are at high risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) in older patients with cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical and economic impact of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention (RECAP) to optimize drug therapy in patients with cancer ≥75 years admitted to oncology or geriatric wards. METHOD: RECAP intervention was defined as follows: at admission and discharge, hospital pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reconciliation and review, identified relevant DRPs and provided optimization recommendations to prescribers; at discharge, pharmacists also provided patient education and shared information with primary care providers. The impact of the intervention was assessed by the rate of implementation of recommendations by the prescribers and the evolution of polypharmacy rate; a peer review of the clinical significance of DRPs was performed by an expert panel of geriatric oncologists and pharmacists. A cost saving analysis compared cost avoided through resolution of DRPs to cost of pharmacist's time. RESULTS: From January 2019 and August 2020, 201 patients were included (median age 80 [75-97] years), 68.7% with solid tumors. DRPs requiring optimization were identified in 70.9% of patients at admission (mean 1.7 DRP/patient) and 47.7% at discharge (0.9 DRP/patient). Most pharmacist recommendations (70.8%) were followed by prescribers, allowing the correction of 1.2 DRP/patient at admission and 0.7 DRP/patient at discharge. Half of resolved DRPs were rated as clinically significant. However, polypharmacy rate was not reduced at discharge. Cost comparison showed $7.2 avoided for $1 invested, with an estimated total net benefit of $354,822 (mean $1766 per patient). CONCLUSIONS: The RECAP model significantly reduces DRPs in hospitalized older patients with cancer. The model was cost saving, confirming the value of implementing it in routine practice.

Potentially inappropriate medications and anticholinergic and sedative burden in older community-dwelling patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

Objective: Regarding older patients, multiple chronic conditions lead to the intake of multiple medications, involving a higher risk of adverse drug events. In older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, the medication exposure was poorly explored. The aim of this study was to describe the use of potentially inappropriate medications and medications with anticholinergic and sedative properties in older community-dwelling patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Methods: An observational study was conducted in a geriatric day-care unit. All patients aged over 65 years with advanced chronic kidney disease, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate < 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 or estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 with rapid progression, and referred by nephrologist for pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment, were included in the study. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified using the EU(7)-PIM list, and he anticholinergic and sedative drug exposure was measured using the Drug Burden Index. Results: Overall, 139 patients were included in the study (mean age 74.4 ± 3.3 years, 32.4% females, 61.9% on dialysis). Potentially inappropriate medications were used by 74.1% (103/139) of patients and were mainly represented by proton pump inhibitors, alpha-1-blockers and central antihypertensive drugs. Regarding anticholinergic and / or sedative medications, 79.9% (111/139) of older patients were exposed. Conclusion: In older community-dwelling patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication exposure and anticholinergic and sedative exposure was high. Interventions focusing on deprescription of these inappropriate medications should be conducted in this specific population.

Objectif: Chez le patient âgé, la polypathologie est souvent associée à la prise de plusieurs médicaments, impliquant un risque élevé d'iatrogénie médicamenteuse. L'exposition médicamenteuse a été peu explorée chez les patients âgés atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique. L'objectif de cette étude est de décrire l'exposition aux médicaments potentiellement inappropriés et aux médicaments présentant des propriétés anticholinergiques et sédatives chez ces patients. Méthodes: Il s'agit d'une étude observationnelle conduite au sein d'un hôpital de jour gériatrique. Tous les patients âgés de plus de 65 ans avec une maladie rénale chronique avancée, définie par un débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé inférieur à 20 mL/min/1,73 m² ou supérieur à 20 mL/min/1,73 m² avec une progression rapide, et adressés par un néphrologue pour la réalisation d'une évaluation gériatrique standardisée pré-transplantation rénale, ont été inclus dans l'étude. Les médicaments potentiellement inappropriés ont été identifiés à partir de la liste EU(7)-PIM, et l'exposition aux médicaments anticholinergiques et sédatifs a été mesurée à partir du Drug Burden Index. Résultats: Un total de 139 patients a été inclus dans l'étude (74,4 ± 3,3 ans, 32,4 % de femmes, 61,9 % dialysés). Des médicaments potentiellement inappropriés ont été retrouvés chez 74,1 % (103/139) des patients. Ils étaient principalement représentés par les inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons, les alpha-1-bloquants et les antihypertenseurs centraux. Concernant les médicaments anticholinergiques et/ou sédatifs, 79,9 % (111/139) des patients âgés étaient exposés. Conclusion: L'étude montre que la prévalence de l'exposition aux médicaments potentiellement inappropriés et aux médicaments anticholinergiques et/ou sédatifs est élevée chez les patients âgés atteints de maladie rénale chronique avancée. Des interventions portant sur la déprescription de ces médicaments devraient être menées auprès de cette population spécifique.

Comparing different robots available in the European market for the preparation of injectable chemotherapy and recommendations to users.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in technology have made it possible to develop robots for preparing injectable anticancer drugs. This study aims to compare characteristics between robots available in the European market in 2022 and to help future pharmacy users in their choices. METHODS: Three sources of data were used: (1) a review of published articles in the MEDLINE database from November 2017 to end of June 2021 on chemotherapy-compounding robots used in hospital; (2) all manufacturers' documentation, and (3) demonstrations of robot operations in real hospital conditions and discussions with users and manufacturers. Robot characteristics included number of robots installed, general technical characteristics, type of injectable chemotherapy produced and compatible materials, productivity data, preparation control methods, residual manual tasks, chemical and microbiological risk management, cleaning method, software, and implementation time. RESULTS: Seven robots commercialized were studied. Several technical characteristics have to be taken into account in selecting the robot whose match the specific needs of a particular hospital, and which often require rethinking the current production workflow as well as the organization of the pharmacy unit. In addition to increasing productivity, the robots improve the quality of production thanks to better traceability, reproducibility, and precision of sampling. They also improve user protection against chemical risk, musculoskeletal disorders, and needle wounds. Nevertheless, when robotization is being planned, there are still numerous residual manual tasks to keep in mind. CONCLUSION: Robotization of the production of injectable anticancer drugs is booming within anticancer chemotherapy preparation pharmacy units. Feedback from this experience needs to be further shared with the pharmacy community regarding this significant investment.

Clinical and economic impact of clinical oncology pharmacy in cancer patients receiving injectable anticancer treatments: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Clinical pharmacy can reduce drug-related iatrogenesis by improving the management of adverse effects of drugs, limiting drug-drug interactions, and improving patient adherence. Given the vulnerability of cancer patients and the toxicity of injectable anticancer drugs, clinical pharmacy service (CPS) could provide a significant clinical benefit in cancer care. This review aims to synthesize existing evidence on clinical pharmacy's impact on patients treated with intravenous anticancer drugs. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline database from January 2000 to December 2021, associating the keywords: clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, pharmacist, oncology, and chemotherapy. To be eligible for inclusion, studies have to report clinical pharmaceutical services for patients treated with intravenous chemotherapy with a clinical and/or economic impact. RESULTS: Forty-one studies met the selection criteria. Various CPS were reported: medication reconciliation, medication review, and pharmaceutical interview with patient. There was a lack of randomized study (n = 3; 7.3%). In one randomized controlled trial, pharmaceutical intervention significantly improved quality of life of patients receiving pharmaceutical care during injectable anticancer drugs courses. Economical results appear to show positive impact of clinical pharmacy with cost savings reported from 3112.87$ to 249 844€. Although most studies were non-comparative, they highlighted that clinical pharmacy tend to limit chemotherapy side effects and drug-related problems, improve quality of life and satisfaction of patients and healthcare professional, and a positive economic impact. CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacy can reduce adverse drug events in cancer patients. More robust and economic evaluations are still required to support its development in everyday practice.

Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions on multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Optimizing medication use is a major issue in older patients with cancer and pharmacists are increasingly involved in their multidisciplinary care. The implementation of pharmaceutical care interventions must be supported by impact evaluations to enable their development and funding. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in older patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for articles reporting evaluations of pharmaceutical care interventions for patients with cancer aged 65 years or older. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the selection criteria. Most pharmacists were part of multidisciplinary geriatric oncology teams. Whether in outpatient or inpatient settings, interventions had common components, including patient interview, medication reconciliation, and comprehensive medication review to assess drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs were identified in 95% of patients with 1.7 to 3 DRPs on average. Pharmacist recommendations resulted in a 20-40% reduction in the total number of DRPs and a 20-25% decrease in the prevalence of DRP. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate or omitted medications and their subsequent deprescribing or addition varied greatly between studies, notably depending on detection tools used. Clinical impact was insufficiently evaluated. Only one study reported a reduction of anticancer treatment toxicities following a joint pharmaceutical and geriatric assessment. A single economic evaluation calculated a potential net benefit of $3,864.23 per patient resulting from the intervention. DISCUSSION: These encouraging results must be confirmed by more robust evaluations to support the involvement of pharmacists in multidisciplinary care of older patients with cancer.

Drug-related problems in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease identified during pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease may be exposed to a higher risk of adverse drug events due to chronic kidney disease and aging. The integration of clinical pharmacist into pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment is an opportunity to perform medication optimization. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe drug-related problems in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: Observational study was conducted with retrospective data from July 2017 to April 2019. Patients≥65 years with advanced chronic kidney disease, referred by nephrologists for pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment were included. During medication optimization, the pharmacist evaluated the appropriateness of each medication prescribed and identified drug-related problems. Any drug-related problem identified lead to a pharmaceutical intervention. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were included (74.5±2.9 years, 26.2% female, 47.6% on dialysis). Overall, 394 drug-related problems were identified in 93.2% of patients (3.8±2.4 drug-related problems per patient) during the medication optimization. Cardiovascular medications (25.1%), antithrombotics (13.5%) and drugs for peptic ulcer and reflux disease (10.2%) were the most involved drugs in drug-related problems. Drug-related problems mainly concerned drugs without indication (27.1%), inappropriate method of administration (24.4%) and non-conformity to guidelines (20.1%). CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of drug-related problems in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease was identified during medication optimization. The systematic integration of a clinical pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team performing pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment may be relevant to detect inappropriate prescriptions and to prevent from adverse drug events.