Prevalence of anti-parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM and parvovirus B19 viremia in pregnant women in an urban area of Northern Italy.

Parvovirus B19 (B19V) infection in pregnancy is mostly asymptomatic, but can cause complications including abortion and fetal hydrops. Although its infection is ubiquitous, seroprevalence among pregnant women varies according to different geographical areas. Since seroprevalence data in Italy are limited, the prevalence of antibodies and DNA in pregnant women was evaluated retrospectively, correlating the clinical situation of mothers and newborns. One thousand eight hundred and ninety-three sequential sera were examined from pregnant women (60.8% in the first trimester, 16.6% in the second one, and 22.6% in the third one, respectively) for anti-B19V IgG and IgM (confirmed by immunoblot); 1402 (74.1%) were of Italian origin and 491 (25.9%) non-Italian women. Molecular tests were used to search for viral genome. One thousand three hundred and fifteen (69.5%) samples were IgG-positive, 21 (1.1%) IgM-positive, and 578 (30.5%) nonimmune. The difference in IgG seroprevalence between Italian (71.1%) and non-Italian women (64.8%) was statistically significant. Of the 21 IgM-positive women, 16 were confirmed positive also by immunoblot (prevalence: 0.8%), of which 11 were viraemic (prevalence: 0.6%; mean 1.3 × 104 geq/ml). Mothers were asymptomatic, and the newborns had no clinical signs of congenital infection. IgG seroprevalence in Italy is high, with differences between Italian women and non-Italian women from geographic areas with lower endemic levels of B19V. The consistent migratory flows in place could lead to an increase in the number of susceptible women. The prevalence of viremia is low, and has not been associated with evident fetal damage at birth.

Negative Atopy Patch Test and Negative Skin Prick Test Reduce the Need for Oral Food Challenge in Children with Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is commonly associated with food allergy. Oral food challenge is the gold standard in the diagnosis of food allergy, but still has some troubles. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single test among skin prick test (SPT), measurement of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and atopy patch test (APT) or a combination of them could make food challenges unnecessary in patients with AD. Twenty patients affected by AD, under 6 years of age, were evaluated. Every child was investigated for cow's milk and hen's egg allergy using SPT, measurement of serum IgE (sIgE), APT, diagnostic elimination diet for 4 weeks, and open food challenges for milk and egg. The diagnosis of food allergy was established according to the results of the food challenge. We compared the results of all the tests with those of the open food challenge and calculated for each test the following parameters: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Eight of 40 open food challenges were assessed as positive. None of the diagnostic tools showed a sufficient accuracy to be able to replace the food challenge. However, SPT, APT, and the measurement of sIgE as single parameters showed an NPV of 90%, and the combination of SPT and APT showed an NPV of 92%. Food challenge remains the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis in young children with AD, but the combination of SPT and APT is useful when both tests are negative, because this result provides a guidance in excluding an allergy to the investigated food and could make the food challenge superfluous in this case.