Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 39(2): 154-7, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15000277

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The standard remission maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC) is 5-amino-salicylic acid (5-ASA), given orally and topically and in different doses, with various frequencies and duration of administration. Both the efficacy of long-term intermittent therapy with low-dose 5-ASA enemas in preventing UC relapses and its economic implications were evaluated. METHODS: In accordance with a prospective case control study, 42 adult UC outpatients (29 M and 13 F) were treated with 5-ASA tablets (1.6 g/day) and 5-ASA enemas (2 g/50 mL) twice weekly, and 42 concurrent UC outpatients, matched for sex, age, extension and duration of disease, received only the oral therapy; the median treatment period was 6 years. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the number (42%: P = 0.034) and incidence of relapses (43%: P = 0.022) in the patients receiving combined oral + topical 5-ASA, who also had a significantly higher cumulative probability of not experiencing a first relapse (P = 0.001). There were no dropouts or side effects. Local therapy increased drug costs, but decreased the costs of relapses by 48% and completely precluded hospitalization costs. CONCLUSIONS: The scheduled oral + topical 5-ASA treatment, at the lowest cumulative topical dosage tested over the longest known observation period, is efficacious in improving clinical outcome and decreasing overall costs in UC patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/economics , Case-Control Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Enema , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Mesalamine/administration & dosage , Mesalamine/economics , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 12(5): 343-8, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11444080

ABSTRACT

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in ulcerative colitis (UC), but there are no data concerning body composition (fat and lean mass) in such patients. We used whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR 1000 W) at baseline and after 6 years of follow-up to study bone density, and fat and lean mass in 43 outpatients with mild UC (21 men, mean age 36 years, range 21-57 years, and 22 women, mean age 35 years, range 23-45 years at baseline; disease extent: 2 proctitis, 18 proctosigmoiditis, 8 left colitis, 5 substantial colitis, 10 pancolitis; mean disease duration 8 years, range 2-18 years; no hospitalization; few relapses during the follow-up) and 111 healthy volunteers matched by sex, age and body mass index. There were 5 drop-outs. We observed no significant difference in BMD, or fat and lean mass between the male patients and controls at baseline or after 6 years. The total lean mass (Z-score = -3.2, p = 0.001) and trunk lean mass (Z-score = -2.01, p = 0.03) of the female patients were lower than those of the controls at baseline, whereas their limb lean mass was higher at both the beginning and the end of the study (Z-score = 2.14, p = 0.03; Z-score = 2.8, p = 0.004, respectively). At baseline there was a significant negative correlation between lifetime steroid intake (enteral and parenteral) and lumbar spine BMD, obtained as whole body subregion (r = -0.53, p = 0.0006). After 6 years there was a significant negative correlation in women between whole body and lumbar spine BMD and both steroid intake (r = -0.53, p = 0.01; and r = -0.62, p = 0.003) and the number of relapses (r = -0.49, p = 0.02; and r = -0.44, p = 0.05). Mild UC thus does not represent a risk factor for osteopenia per se. The differences in lean mass between the female patients and controls do not seem to be clinically relevant.


Subject(s)
Body Composition/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/physiopathology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adipose Tissue/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Density/drug effects , Extremities/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Bones/physiopathology , Prospective Studies
4.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 95(6): 1491-4, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10894585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, but body composition (fat and lean mass) has never been concomitantly studied. We sought to investigate BMD and body composition in a group of UC outpatients with the following characteristics: age 18-60 yr (men) and 18-45 yr (women); no intestinal resection; no immunosuppressive treatment; and regular menstruation. METHODS: Whole body and subregional BMD and body composition in 43 UC patients (21 men, 22 women; male mean age, 36.5 [21-57] yr; female mean age, 35.3 [23-45] yr) and 121 healthy volunteers were studied by means of dual X-ray photon absorptiometry. RESULTS: There were no differences in total and subregional BMD, or fat and lean mass between the patients and controls, except that the total and trunk lean mass of the UC women was lower than that in the normal controls. No correlation was found between lifetime steroid intake and BMD. CONCLUSIONS: UC outpatients do not differ from normal subjects in terms of BMD and fat mass. Mild and moderate UC does not represent a risk factor for osteopenia.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Bone Density , Colitis, Ulcerative/metabolism , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Values , Sex Characteristics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...