Prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: experience in a managed care setting.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with glucocorticoids is the leading cause of drug-induced osteoporosis. Currently available guidelines indicate that patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy should receive measures to prevent osteoporosis. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy in a managed care setting received preventive therapy or prescribed medications for osteoporosis and to identify patient and provider characteristics associated with treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 224 health plan enrollees 20 years and older who were dispensed at least 1 oral glucocorticoid prescription per quarter during the period October 1997 through September 1998 was identified from administrative data. Medical charts and administrative data were reviewed to determine use of preventive therapy and prescribed medications for osteoporosis. RESULTS: Of the 224 patients, 62% had at least 1 documented intervention aimed at osteoporosis prevention (counseling about calcium or vitamin D or weight-bearing exercise; prescription for estrogen, calcitonin, or bisphosphonate; or a bone mineral density study). Women were more likely than men to receive intervention (76% vs 44%; prevalence odds ratio, 4.41; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-9.10). Patients receiving a mean daily prednisone dose of 10 mg or more or 5 to less than 10 mg were no more likely to receive intervention than those receiving 5 mg or less prednisone daily. Sixty-two (90%) of 69 patients who were prescribed glucocorticoid therapy by rheumatologists had at least 1 intervention documented compared with 29 (48%) of 60 for internists, 26 (55%) of 47 for pulmonologists, and 22 (46%) of 48 for all other physicians. In a multiple logistic regression model, including patient age, sex, mean daily glucocorticoid dose, and physician specialty, women and patients prescribed glucocorticoids by a rheumatologist were significantly more likely to receive intervention aimed at osteoporosis prevention. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy do not receive preventive therapy for osteoporosis. Efforts should be made to reduce barriers to such treatment and increase the proportion of patients given preventive therapy.

Evaluation of a formulary switch from conjugated to esterified estrogens in a managed care setting.

BACKGROUND: Formulary switches between agents in the same therapeutic class have become commonplace in the managed care setting as a strategy to reduce costs. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of a formulary switch from conjugated to esterified estrogen tablets at the Fallon Community Health Plan, a mixed-model health maintenance organization. DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted with the use of the automated database of the health plan. SUBJECTS: Study subjects were members of the health plan during the period from May 1, 1995, to December 31, 1997, who were dispensed > or =1 estrogen replacement product. From this population, a cohort of users of conjugated estrogens during the period from May 1, 1995, to October 31, 1995, was selected. MEASURES: The cumulative incidence of switching from conjugated to esterified estrogen tablets and subsequent discontinuations of esterified estrogens was evaluated. The frequencies of ambulatory encounters during the 6 months before and after a switch or discontinuation were compared. RESULTS: During the period after promotion of the formulary switch, 2,149 of 2,984 patients (72%) originally dispensed conjugated estrogen tablets switched to esterified estrogen tablets. Among those patients switching to esterified estrogens, an excess of 20 office visits per 100 patients was noted in the postswitch period (P = 0.005). The risk of switching back to conjugated estrogen tablets was 15% by 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that plan efforts were successful in switching most users of conjugated estrogens to esterified estrogens. The switch was associated with an increase in utilization of health care services.

Evaluating the predictive value of osteoarthritis diagnoses in an administrative database.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the positive and negative predictive values of osteoarthritis (OA) diagnoses contained in an administrative database. METHODS: We identified all members (> or =18 years of age) of a Massachusetts health maintenance organization with documentation of at least one health care encounter associated with an OA diagnosis during the period 1994-1996. From this population, we randomly selected 350 subjects. In addition, we randomly selected 250 enrollees (proportionally by the age and sex of the 350 subjects) who did not have a health care encounter associated with an OA diagnosis. Trained nurse reviewers abstracted OA-related clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data from the medical records of both study groups (all but 1 chart was available for review). Pairs of physician reviewers evaluated the abstracted information for both groups of subjects and rated the evidence for the presence of OA according to 3 levels: definite, possible, and unlikely. RESULTS: Among the group of patients with an administrative diagnosis of OA, 215 (62%) were rated as having definite OA, 36 (10%) possible OA, and 98 (28%) unlikely OA, according to information contained in the medical record. The positive predictive value of an OA diagnosis was 62%. In those without an administrative OA diagnosis, 44 (18%) were assigned a rating of definite OA. The negative predictive value of the absence of an administrative OA diagnosis was 78%. CONCLUSION: Use of administrative data in epidemiologic and health services research on OA may lead to both case misclassification and under ascertainment.