Prognostic Impact of the UMIPIC Program in the Follow Up in Patients with Heart Failure and Cardiorenal Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Individuals suffering from heart failure (HF) and cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) represent a special group of patients considering their age, multiple health issues, and treatment challenges. These factors make them more susceptible to frequent hospital stays and a higher mortality rate. UMIPIC is a multidisciplinary care model program for patients with heart failure follow up provided by internists and nurses who are experts in this entity. Our study delved into the effectiveness of this specialized care program (UMIPIC) in mitigating these risks for HF and CRS patients. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of 3255 patients diagnosed with HF and CRS types 2 and 4, sourced from the RICA registry. These patients were divided into two distinct groups: those enrolled in the UMIPIC program (1205 patients) and those under standard care (2050 patients). Using propensity score matching, we ensured that both groups were comparable. The study focused on tracking hospital admissions and mortality rates for one year after an HF-related hospital stay. RESULTS: Patients in the UMIPIC group experienced fewer hospital readmissions due to HF compared to their counterparts (20% vs. 32%; Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.48; 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.40-0.57; p < 0.001). They also showed a lower mortality rate (24% vs. 36%; HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54-0.75; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the UMIPIC group had fewer total hospital admissions (36% vs. 47%; HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.51-0.66; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The UMIPIC program, centered on holistic and ongoing care, effectively reduces both hospital admissions and mortality rates for HF and CRS patients after a one-year follow-up period.

Projected clinical benefits of dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Aims: To address the projected clinical benefits of dapagliflozin among patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: A multicenter, prospective, cohort study of patients ≥50 years admitted with HF to Spanish internal medicine departments. The projected clinical benefits of dapagliflozin were calculated from the DELIVER trial. Results: A total of 4049 patients were included; 3271 (80.8%) were eligible for dapagliflozin treatment, according to DELIVER criteria. Within 1 year after discharge, 22.2% were rehospitalized for HF and 21.6% died. Implementation of dapagliflozin would translate into an absolute risk reduction of 1.3% for mortality and 5.1% for HF readmission. Conclusion: HF patients with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction have a high risk of events. The use of dapagliflozin could substantially reduce the HF burden.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction is frequent in clinical practice, particularly in the elderly. In HF with preserved ejection fraction, the heart still pumps a similar proportion of blood, but the heart muscle has become thicker. This means there is less space inside the heart to fill with blood, so too little is pumped out each time. Until very recently, no drugs had been shown to provide significant benefits on the outcome of the condition or the chance of recovery for these patients. Fortunately, recent clinical trials have demonstrated that treatment with drugs called SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g., dapagliflozin) could reduce the chance of being admitted to hospital or dying from HF. We investigated the benefits for patients who took dapagliflozin after being admitted to hospital and had HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. We saw substantial benefits in this population.

Combining loop with thiazide diuretics for decompensated heart failure: the CLOROTIC trial.

AIMS: To evaluate whether the addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to intravenous furosemide is a safe and effective strategy for improving diuretic response in acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, including patients with AHF randomized to receive HCTZ or placebo in addition to an intravenous furosemide regimen. The coprimary endpoints were changes in body weight and patient-reported dyspnoea 72 h after randomization. Secondary outcomes included metrics of diuretic response and mortality/rehospitalizations at 30 and 90 days. Safety outcomes (changes in renal function and/or electrolytes) were also assessed. Two hundred and thirty patients (48 women, 83 years) were randomized. Patients assigned to HCTZ were more likely to lose weight at 72 h than those assigned to placebo [2.3 vs. 1.5 kg; adjusted estimated difference (notionally 95 confidence interval) 1.14 (1.84 to 0.42); P 0.002], but there were no significant differences in patient-reported dyspnoea (area under the curve for visual analogue scale: 960 vs. 720; P 0.497). These results were similar 96 h after randomization. Patients allocated to HCTZ showed greater 24 h diuresis (1775 vs. 1400 mL; P 0.05) and weight loss for each 40 mg of furosemide (at 72 and at 96 h) (P 0.001). Patients assigned to HCTZ more frequently presented impaired renal function (increase in creatinine 26.5 moL/L or decrease in eGFR 50; 46.5 vs. 17.2; P 0.001), but hypokalaemia and hypokalaemia were similar between groups. There were no differences in mortality or rehospitalizations. CONCLUSION: The addition of HCTZ to loop diuretic therapy improved diuretic response in patients with AHF.

Beta-blocker use in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and sinus rhythm.

INTRODUCTION: Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (beta-blockers) are frequently used for patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), although evidence-based recommendations for this indication are still lacking. Our goal was to assess which clinical factors are associated with the prescription of beta-blockers in patients discharged after an episode of HFpEF decompensation, and the clinical outcomes of these patients. METHODS: We assessed 1078 patients with HFpEF and in sinus rhythm who had experienced an acute HF episode to explore whether prescription of beta-blockers on discharge was associated with one-year all-cause mortality or the composite endpoint of one-year all-cause death or HF readmission. We also examined the clinical factors associated with beta-blocker discharge prescription for such patients. RESULTS: At discharge, 531 (49.3%) patients were on beta-blocker therapy. Patients on beta-blockers more often had a prior diagnosis of hypertension and more comorbidity (including ischemic heart disease) and a better functional status, but less often a prior diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These patients had a lower heart rate on admission and more often used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and loop diuretics. One year after the index admission, 161 patients (15%) had died and 314 (29%) had experienced the composite endpoint. After multivariate adjustment, beta-blocker prescription was not associated with either all-cause mortality (HR=0.83 [95% CI 0.61-1.13]; p=0.236) or the composite endpoint (HR=0.98 [95% CI 0.79-1.23]; p=0.882). CONCLUSION: In patients with HFpEF in sinus rhythm, beta-blocker use was not related to one-year mortality or mortality plus HF readmission.

Effect of a Therapeutic Strategy Guided by Lung Ultrasound on 6-Month Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: Randomized, Multicenter Trial (EPICC Study).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary congestion (PC) is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death in patients with heart failure (HF). Lung ultrasound has shown to be highly sensitive for detecting PC in HF. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether lung ultrasound-guided therapy improves 6-month outcomes in patients with HF compared with conventional treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized, multicenter, single-blind clinical trial in patients discharged from Internal Medicine Departments after hospitalization for decompensated HF. Participants will be assigned 1:1 to receive treatment guided according to the presence of lung ultrasound signs of congestion (semi-quantitative evaluation of B lines and the presence of pleural effusion) versus clinical assessment of congestion. The primary outcome is the combination of cardiovascular death and readmission for HF at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will provide more evidence about the impact of lung ultrasound on treatment monitoring in patients with chronic HF.

Influencia de la fibrilación auricular en la mortalidad de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección preservada / Influence of atrial fibrillation on the mortality of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Introducción y objetivos: La información del impacto de la fibrilación auricular (FA) en el pronóstico de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección preservada (IC-FEP) es controvertido. Se analizó el pronóstico en cuanto a la mortalidad y los reingresos al año de los pacientes con IC-FEP y FA. Métodos: Estudio observacional y prospectivo en 1.971 pacientes con IC-FEP, que presentan un ingreso por IC aguda. Los pacientes se dividieron en 2 grupos según la presencia o no de FA. Analizamos la mortalidad, los reingresos y el combinado mortalidad/reingresos al año de seguimiento. Resultados: Un total de 1.177 (59%) pacientes presentaban FA, con una edad media de 80,3 (7,8) años, y de ellos, 1.233 (63%) eran mujeres. El paciente con IC-FEP y FA tenía una mayor edad, era del sexo femenino y presentaba más frecuentemente un origen valvular y una menor comorbilidad medida por el índice de Charlson. Al año de seguimiento, 430 (22%) pacientes murieron y 840 (43%) fueron reingresados. Entre los 2 grupos analizados no hubo diferencia en la mortalidad por todas las causas (22 vs. 21%; p=0,739, FA vs. no FA, respectivamente) ni por causas cardiovasculares (9,6 vs. 8,2%; p=0,739, FA vs. no FA, respectivamente). En el análisis multivariable se asociaron con mayor mortalidad: la edad, el sexo masculino, la etiología valvular, la hiperuricemia y la comorbilidad. En el análisis del subgrupo con IC-FEP con FA, la presencia de FA crónica comparada con la FA de novo se asoció con una mayor mortalidad (HR 1,716; IC 95% 1,099-2,681; p=0,018). Conclusiones: En pacientes con IC-FEP es frecuente la presencia de FA. Durante el seguimiento a un año, la presencia de FA no influye en la mortalidad ni en los reingresos hospitalarios en pacientes con IC-FEP

Introduction and objectives: The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is still the subject of debate. We analysed the influence of AF on the prognosis on mortality and readmission in patients with HFpEF. Methods: Prospective observational study in 1,971 patients with HFpEF, who were admitted for acute heart failure. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of AF. We analysed mortality, readmissions and combined mortality/readmissions at one year follow-up. Results: A total of 1,177 (59%) patients had AF, mean age 80.3 (7.8) years and 1,233 (63%) were women. Patients with HFpEF and AF were older, female, greater valvular aetiology and lower comorbidity measured by the Charlson index. At the one year follow-up, 430 (22%) patients had died and 840 (43%) had been readmitted. In the 2 groups analysed, there was no difference in all-cause mortality (22 vs. 21%; P=.739, AF vs. no-AF, respectively) or cardiovascular causes (9.6 vs. 8.2%; P=.739, AF vs. no-AF, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher mortality were: age, male, valvular aetiology, uric acid, and comorbidity. In the analysis of the subgroup with HFpEF with AF, the presence of chronic AF compared to de novo AF was associated with higher mortality (HR 1,716; 95% CI 1,099-2,681; P=.018). Conclusions: In patients with HFpEF, the presence of AF is frequent. During the one-year follow-up, the presence of AF does not influence mortality or readmissions in patients with HFpEF

Conclusions: In patients with HFpEF, the presence of AF is frequent. During the one-year follow-up, the presence of AF does not influence mortality or readmissions in patients with HFpEF

Influence of atrial fibrillation on the mortality of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. / Influencia de la fibrilación auricular en la mortalidad de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección preservada.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is still the subject of debate. We analysed the influence of AF on the prognosis on mortality and readmission in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: Prospective observational study in 1,971 patients with HFpEF, who were admitted for acute heart failure. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of AF. We analysed mortality, readmissions and combined mortality/readmissions at one year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,177 (59%) patients had AF, mean age 80.3 (7.8) years and 1,233 (63%) were women. Patients with HFpEF and AF were older, female, greater valvular aetiology and lower comorbidity measured by the Charlson index. At the one year follow-up, 430 (22%) patients had died and 840 (43%) had been readmitted. In the 2 groups analysed, there was no difference in all-cause mortality (22 vs. 21%; P=.739, AF vs. no-AF, respectively) or cardiovascular causes (9.6 vs. 8.2%; P=.739, AF vs. no-AF, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher mortality were: age, male, valvular aetiology, uric acid, and comorbidity. In the analysis of the subgroup with HFpEF with AF, the presence of chronic AF compared to de novo AF was associated with higher mortality (HR 1,716; 95% CI 1,099-2,681; P=.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, the presence of AF is frequent. During the one-year follow-up, the presence of AF does not influence mortality or readmissions in patients with HFpEF.

Influence of renal dysfunction phenotype on mortality in decompensated heart failure with preserved and mid-range ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Natriuretic peptides or the blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio (BUN/creat) can identify high- vs low-risk renal impairment (RI) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF). However, the situation in HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) and mid-range ejection fraction (HF-MREF) remains unclear. METHODS: We evaluated patients from the Spanish National Registry of Heart Failure (RICA) that were admitted to Internal Medicine units with acute decompensated HF. Median admission values were used to define elevated NT-proBNP and BUN/creat. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients were evaluated, 743 with HF-PEF and 192 with HF-MREF). In patients with both NT-proBNP and BUN/creat below median admission values, RI was not associated with mortality (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.7-1.87, p=0.581 in HF-PEF and HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.58-2.81, p=0.548 in HF-MREF). However, in patients with both elevated NT-proBNP and BUN/creat, those with RI had worse survival than those without RI (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.33-3.06, p<0.001 in HF-PEF and HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.37-5.67, p=0.005 in HF-MREF). In HF-PEF even patients with RI with only 1 of the 2 parameters elevated, had a substantially higher risk of death compared to patients without RI (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.26; p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical cohort of acute decompensated HF-PEF and HF-MREF patients, the combined use of NT-proBNP and BUN/creat stratifies patients with RI into groups with significantly different prognoses.

Los programas/unidades de insuficiencia cardiaca. Una visión multidisciplinaria / Heart failure programs / units. a multidisciplinary approach

No disponible

New onset heart failure--Clinical characteristics and short-term mortality. A RICA (Spanish registry of acute heart failure) study.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a growing global epidemic. The main study aims is to evaluate the differences between new-onset and chronic-decompensated HF patients. Secondary objectives related only to new-onset HF patients include the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mid-term mortality related risk factors METHODS: We analyzed 2190 patients hospitalized for acute HF. We compare the 683 patients with a new-onset HF episode with the rest. Restricting the analysis to the new-onset HF patients, we also compare patients with preserved LVEF (EF>50%) with those with reduced LVEF, and analyze the factors associated with three-month mortality. RESULTS: A total of 683 (31.2%) patients fulfill the criteria for "new-onset HF". These patients are older, their HF is more often related to hypertension, show higher blood pressure and heart rate values upon admission, and present with less global and disease-specific comorbidity and better baseline overall functional status. New-onset HF is more often characterized by preserved LVEF, milder baseline NYHA class and lower plasma natriuretic peptide values. After 3 months; 33 (5.2%) new-onset HF patients had died (p<0.001). Cox multivariate analysis showed a correlation between mortality and older age (hazard ratio - HR - 1.08), higher global comorbidity (HR 1.20) and lesser prescription of beta-blockers at discharge (HR 0.34). LVEF was unrelated to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: New-onset HF patients show a clinical profile different to that of chronic-decompensated patients. For this subset of acute HF patients older age, higher comorbidity and beta-blocker nonprescription predict a higher risk of mid-term post-discharge mortality.

Has beta-blocker use increased in patients with heart failure in internal medicine settings? Prognostic implications: RICA registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Underuse of beta-blockers has been reported in elderly patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current prescription of beta-blockers in the internal medicine setting, and its association with morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients. METHODS: The information analyzed was obtained from a prospective cohort of patients hospitalized for heart failure (RICA registry] database, patients included from March 2008 to September 2011) with at least one year of follow-up. We investigated the percentage of patients prescribed beta-blockers at hospital discharge, and at 3 and 12 months, and the relationship of beta-blocker use with mortality and readmissions for heart failure. Patients with significant valve disease were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients were analyzed (53.5% women), with a mean age of 77.1 (8.7) years. Beta-blockers were prescribed in 62.1% of patients at discharge. A similar percentage was found at 3 months (65.6%) and 12 months (67.9%) after discharge. All-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure were significantly lower in patients treated with beta-blockers (hazard ratio=0.59, 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.84 vs hazard ratio=0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.83). This decrease in mortality was maintained after adjusting by age, sex, ejection fraction, functional class, comorbidities, and concomitant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that beta-blocker use is increasing in heart failure patients (mainly elderly) treated in the internal medicine setting, and suggest that the use of these drugs is associated with a reduction in clinical events.

¿Se ha incrementado el uso de bloqueadores beta en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca en medicina interna? Implicaciones pronósticas: registro RICA / Has Beta-blocker Use Increased in Patients With Heart Failure in Internal Medicine Settings? Prognostic Implications: RICA Registry

Introducción y objetivos: Se ha descrito una infrautilización de bloqueadores beta en pacientes de edad avanzada con insuficiencia cardiaca. El objetivo es determinar el grado de prescripción actual de bloqueadores beta en servicios de medicina interna y su asociación con la morbimortalidad. Métodos: La información analizada se obtuvo de los datos de una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes hospitalizados por insuficiencia cardiaca (registro RICA, incluidos entre marzo de 2008 y septiembre de 2011) con al menos 1 año de seguimiento. Se evaluaron los porcentajes de prescripción de bloqueadores beta al alta hospitalaria, a los 3 meses y al año, y su asociación con la mortalidad y los reingresos hospitalarios. Se excluyó a los pacientes con valvulopatía significativa. Resultados: Se analizó a 515 pacientes (el 53,5% mujeres; media de edad, 77,1 ± 8,7 años). La prescripción de bloqueadores beta al alta hospitalaria fue del 62,1%. Durante el seguimiento, este porcentaje de prescripción fue similar tanto a los 3 meses (65,6%) como al año (67,9%). La mortalidad total y la variable combinada de mortalidad total y reingresos por insuficiencia cardiaca fue significativamente inferior entre los pacientes tratados que en los no tratados (hazard ratio = 0,59; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 0,41-0,84 frente a hazard ratio = 0,64; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 0,49-0,83). La disminución de la mortalidad se mantuvo tras ajustar por edad, sexo, fracción de eyección, clase funcional, comorbilidades y tratamiento concomitante. Conclusiones: Los datos del estudio indican incremento en la utilización de bloqueadores beta en pacientes mayoritariamente ancianos con insuficiencia cardiaca atendidos en servicios de medicina interna, y su implementación probablemente se asocia a una reducción de los eventos clínicos (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Underuse of beta-blockers has been reported in elderly patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current prescription of beta-blockers in the internal medicine setting, and its association with morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients. Methods: The information analyzed was obtained from a prospective cohort of patients hospitalized for heart failure (RICA registry] database, patients included from March 2008 to September 2011) with at least one year of follow-up. We investigated the percentage of patients prescribed beta-blockers at hospital discharge, and at 3 and 12 months, and the relationship of beta-blocker use with mortality and readmissions for heart failure. Patients with significant valve disease were excluded. Results: A total of 515 patients were analyzed (53.5% women), with a mean age of 77.1 (8.7) years. Beta-blockers were prescribed in 62.1% of patients at discharge. A similar percentage was found at 3 months (65.6%) and 12 months (67.9%) after discharge. All-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure were significantly lower in patients treated with beta-blockers (hazard ratio=0.59, 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.84 vs hazard ratio=0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.83). This decrease in mortality was maintained after adjusting by age, sex, ejection fraction, functional class, comorbidities, and concomitant treatment. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that beta-blocker use is increasing in heart failure patients (mainly elderly) treated in the internal medicine setting, and suggest that the use of these drugs is associated with a reduction in clinical events (AU)