Sex Differences in Recovery-Related Outcomes and Needs for Psychiatric Rehabilitation in People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Female sex/gender has been associated with better longitudinal outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Few studies have investigated the relationships between female gender and recovery-related outcomes. Women's specific psychiatric rehabilitation needs remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the present study are to investigate sex differences in (1) objective and subjective aspects of recovery and (2) psychiatric rehabilitation needs in a multicenter non-selected psychiatric rehabilitation SSD sample. METHODS: 1,055 outpatients with SSD (DSM-5) were recruited from the French National Centers of Reference for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (REHABase) cohort between January 2016 and November 2019. Evaluation included standardized scales for quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being and a broad cognitive battery. Socially valued roles at enrollment were recorded. Functional recovery was measured using the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) and personal recovery with the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI). RESULTS: Female sex was the best predictor of having more than 2 socially valued roles in the multivariate analysis (P < .001; OR [95% CI] = 5.42 [2.34-13.06]). No sex differences were found for functional recovery or personal recovery. Female gender was positively associated with self-stigma (P = .036) and suicidal history (P < .001) and negatively correlated with quality of life (P = .004) and satisfaction with interpersonal relationships (P = .029), an area in which women reported more unmet needs (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that women had poorer subjective recovery-related outcomes and more unmet needs than men. It would therefore be beneficial to develop recovery-oriented interventions addressing women's specific needs and implement these in psychiatric rehabilitation services.

Impact of insight and metacognition on vocational rehabilitation of individuals with severe mental illness: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Identifying specific insight and/or metacognitive measures predicting vocational outcomes would lead to a refinement of cognitive and behavioral assessment and treatment of people with severe mental illness. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of empirical research following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published in PubMed and PsycINFO from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2020 and including words referring to "vocational outcomes", "insight," and "metacognition" were screened. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included, 19 assessing insight and 9 assessing metacognition and their relationships with vocational outcomes in patients with severe mental illness. Thirteen studies (68%) identified statistically significant relationships between insight scores and vocational outcomes. Five studies (56%) identified statistically significant relationships between metacognition scores or metacognitive training and vocational outcomes. The most common tools whose measures were significantly related to vocational outcomes were the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight, the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder and the Metacognition Assessment Scale-Abbreviated. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Insight and metacognition appeared to be related to the vocational outcomes of people with severe mental illness. However, due to the heterogeneity of variables used to operationalize insight, metacognition, and vocational outcomes, it was not possible to determine the overall effect of insight and metacognition. Nevertheless, assessment including the measures of insight and metacognition would be relevant in vocational rehabilitation centers and in centers providing care through employment. The literature lacks predictive models of employment variables including insight and metacognition, so further studies should address this. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Peer Role-Play for Training Communication Skills in Medical Students: A Systematic Review.

STATEMENT: Peer role-play (PRP) is a simulation-based training method (SBTM) in which medical students alternately play the patient's and clinician's role. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of PRP for improving the communication skills of medical students. A systematic search was conducted in the MedLine, PsycInfo, and ERIC databases. Studies were qualitatively analyzed according to the Kirkpatrick evaluation level (Kirkpatrick level) and the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.Twenty-two studies were included. Studies assessing the "reaction" of students (Kirkpatrick level 1, n = 15) found that PRP was appreciated, whereas those assessing the effect of PRP on "learning" (Kirkpatrick level 2, n = 12) found that PRP improves communication skills but no more than other SBTMs. No study assessed real-life "attitudes" or "clinical outcomes" (Kirkpatrick levels 3 and 4), whereas 2 studies found that using PRP had a better cost-efficacy ratio than the use of simulated patients. Compared with other SBTMs, PRP improved communication skills similarly in medical students and seemed less expensive.

Functioning and cognitive characteristics of clozapine users referred to psychosocial rehabilitation centers: A REHABase cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether clozapine users have specific rehabilitation needs compared to users of other antipsychotics. METHODS: The study was performed using the REHABase collecting data on persons referred to a French network of psychosocial rehabilitation centers. It was restricted to persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder using antipsychotics. Multivariate analyses were used to compare baseline functioning and cognitive characteristics in clozapine users vs. users of other antipsychotics. RESULTS: Of the 675 patients identified in the REHABase, one out of ten (n = 70) used clozapine. Compared to users of other antipsychotics, clozapine users had been more frequently hospitalized in psychiatry and presented less frequently with psychoactive substance use. Functional measures did not significantly differ between the two groups. Clozapine users had poorer short-term verbal memory performance than users of other antipsychotics and did not differ on executive performance. CONCLUSION: Clozapine users may reach a recovery level comparable to that obtained in persons without treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In order to reduce the negative impact of memory deficits on the recovery process of clozapine users, it is necessary to optimize their psychotropic treatment and to promote their access to cognitive remediation programs addressing their specific needs.

Satisfaction and Needs in Serious Mental Illness and Autism Spectrum Disorder: The REHABase Psychosocial Rehabilitation Project.

OBJECTIVE: The REHABase project is a French observational, prospective, and multicenter cohort study of serious mental illness and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), launched in 2016 for a planned minimum duration of 15 years. The aim is to characterize the care and quality-of-life needs of participants. This article presents initial results from data collection. METHODS: Psychosocial, cognitive, and functional data were collected at baseline, annually, and after rehabilitation care. Data from the baseline evaluation on diagnoses, medications, well-being, insight, life satisfaction, and care needs are presented. The clinical profiles of REHABase participants with serious mental illness or ASD were assessed in relation to their level of satisfaction with life and well-being in nine life dimensions and their needs, according to their stage of recovery in a five-stage model. RESULTS: Baseline data were collected for 1,397 participants between January 2016 and August 2018. Main diagnoses were schizophrenia spectrum disorder (49%); ASD (13%); and personality (12%), bipolar (9%), and major depressive (6%) disorders. More than 50% of participants reported needs for care or interventions in four of nine dimensions: employment, cognitive functioning, symptom management, and interpersonal relationships. Nearly half of participants were not in the active stages of recovery (stages 4 and 5), and even those considered to have reached the final stage continued to require help in several areas. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants had already received psychiatric care for several years, and most remained dissatisfied with their social and emotional life and their psychological well-being.

Do Home-Based Psychiatric Services for Patients in Medico-Social Institutions Reduce Hospitalizations? Pre-Post Evaluation of a French Psychiatric Mobile Team.

World Health Organization recommends the implementation of alternatives to full-time hospitalizations. Psychiatric home-care has known a worldwide development in the last 20 years. The psychiatric mobile team for social and medico-social institutions in Saint-Etienne, France, (Equipe mobile d'intervention en établissements Sociaux et Médico-sociaux, ESMS) aims to support professionals from medico-social housing institutions (MSHI) in order to maintain people in housing. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of home-based interventions to reduce hospitalizations and improve collaboration between psychiatric hospital facilities and MSHI. We used a pre-post study design. A same cohort of patients living in a MSHI one year before intervention and one year after implementation of the ESMS was studied. Hospitalizations were compared between the two periods. A survey was conducted for qualitative evaluation among professionals in MHSI. Sixty-three patients were included. Most patients suffered from psychotic disorders (71%). We found a significant decrease in the mean number of admissions per year from 2,06 to 1,48 (Wilcoxon signed rank test; df64; p = 0,01). Mobile-team interventions included answering phone calls, home visits, coordination meetings, or clinical interviews with patients in inpatient and outpatient services, with an average of 9,3 interventions per patient (SD = 11,4). ESMS was evaluated as "essential" for 73% of 11 professionals from MSHI who answered the questionnaire in May 2017. Assertive Community Treatment and Crisis Resolution Teams are the most studied home-care models in psychiatry. Our results tend to show the efficiency of mobile-team interventions in MSHI, to enhance partnerships.