Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 15(1): 67.e1-67.e6, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392887

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nomograms and scoring systems designed for predicting the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in adults are currently available. However, no scoring system currently exists primarily for predicting PCNL success in children. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system to predict the stone-free and complication rates by using pre-operative parameters. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 434 renal units belonging to patients with kidney stones who underwent PCNL between 1997 and 2017. Renal stone index was calculated by dividing the length of the stone along its longest axis by the length of the kidney along its longest axis. Guy's Stone scores, S.T.O.N.E scores, and CROES scores for adults were calculated by filling in the variables for each patient. Factors that predicted success and complications were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean age was 8.3 (1-16) years, and male to female ratio was 236:165. When stone-free patients were compared with other patients, there was a statistically significant difference in the average stone/kidney index (SKI) value (stone size/kidney size on longitudinal axis) (0.266 vs 0.339, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors that predicted success were the SKI and number of stones. A newly developed scoring scale, the stone-kidney score (SKS), combined scores for both the SKI and the number of stones into one value. A minimum total SKS score was 2, and a maximum total SKS score was 4. Success rates for SKS scores of 2, 3, and 4 were 86.4%, 73%, and 62.9% (P < 0.001), respectively. Complication rates for SKS scores of 2, 3, and 4 were 13%, 22.1%, and 23.8%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The new scoring system has only two variables (number of stones and SKI) and three risk groups. An SKS score is easier to use and calculate. An SKI value can be simply calculated on any imaging modality by dividing the length of the stone along its longest axis by the length of the kidney along its longest axis. As in the new scoring system, the SKI value combined with the number of stones is useful in predicting stone-free rates after PCNL. CONCLUSION: When evaluated together, the SKI and presence of multiple stones may predict stone-free rates pre-operatively. The SKS is an individual-specific method that can be easily used in pediatric clinical practice. Further studies are required to develop and standardize this method.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/pathology , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Organ Size , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 15(1): 73.e1-73.e6, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30472078

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an anatomic or functional disorder, and it is a condition associated with renal scarring, hypertension, and end-stage renal disease. Renal damage can be prevented by appropriate medical and surgical intervention for selected patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the surgically treated patient group of this study in reference to the risk analysis criteria used in European Association of Urology (EAU), European Society for Paediatric Urology (ESPU) guidelines to see the outcome of the study management protocol within the last 15 years in respect to this risk analysis. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 686 patients who were operated upon in a single institution for VUR between 1997 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the criteria in EAU/ESPU guidelines, the patients were classified into three groups: low, medium, and high risk. Risk factors were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The patient numbers for low, medium, and high risk were 92 (13.4%), 485 (70.7%), and 109 (15.9%), respectively. In the high-risk group, surgeons tended to do more ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) (82.6%), whereas in the low-risk group, surgeons tended to do more subureteric injection (STING) (76.1%). The success rates for STING and UNC were found to be 75% and 93%, respectively. Although there was a difference in success rates among patients treated with STING or UNC, this difference was not statistically significant in success rates regarding risk groups for patients treated with STING or UNC. DISCUSSION: The most recent guideline was that which was published by the EAU/ESPU organization in 2012. This guideline is established based on the risk analysis. The analysis revealed that patients in the low-risk group tended to undergo endoscopic surgery treatment method, whereas patients in the high-risk group tended to undergo open surgery. Therefore, the study management over the last 10 years has been mainly in line with the current recommendations. CONCLUSION: The analysis shows that when the patients are classified according to the EAU/ESPU risk classification, surgeons tended to perform more endoscopic and more open surgery for the low- and high-risk groups, respectively. Although each surgical modality had similar success rates in each group, open surgical results were overall much higher than those of endoscopic surgery in each group. This was a specifically important finding in high-risk group where the endoscopically treated group of patients was small in number, and the need for a definitive correction is essential in this group because of increased risk of renal injury.


Subject(s)
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pediatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Societies, Medical , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Urology
4.
Clin Lab Haematol ; 28(2): 97-104, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16630213

ABSTRACT

No previous study has investigated the full range of complete blood count (CBC) parameters in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns. The main aim of this study was to compare CBC and peripheral smear parameters in term, healthy SGA neonates and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates, and to establish CBC reference values for full-term SGA newborns. One hundred thirty-two healthy, term newborns (73 SGA and 59 AGA) were included. On day 1, we obtained 109 samples and on day 7 we obtained 77 samples. A CBC and peripheral smear were analyzed for each sample collected and group data were compared. We observed higher mean values for normoblast count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and red blood cell (RBC) count in the SGA babies than in the AGA babies on day 1. The mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration values for the SGA babies were decreased because of the relatively high RBC count and relatively high mean corpuscular volume we observed in this group. Of the SGA newborns, 21.9% had neutropenia and 4.7% had absolute neutrophil counts lower than 1500/microl on day 1. On both day 1 and day 7, the SGA newborns had higher mean absolute metamyelocyte counts and higher mean I : T (immature : total neutrophil ratio) values than the AGA group. The SGA babies had a lower mean absolute lymphocyte count on day 7 than the AGA group. We detected thrombocytopenia in almost one-third of the 64 SGA newborns tested on day 1. In summary, our study clearly demonstrates that CBC parameters for healthy, full-term, SGA newborns are different from those of healthy, term AGA newborns. This is the first study that has documented different mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, metamyelocyte counts, lymphocyte counts, and I : T in SGA babies compared with AGA babies.


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn/blood , Infant, Small for Gestational Age/blood , Blood Cell Count/standards , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Male , Reference Values
5.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 27(6): 467-71, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16211321

ABSTRACT

Degenerative disease and instability in the lower lumbar spine may necessitate fusion and stabilization supplemented by instrumentation to the sacrum. However, screw placement in a reasonable position is more difficult to achieve because of the unique anatomy of the first sacral (S1) vertebra. Therefore, this study has been conducted to evaluate sacrum anatomy of the Western Anatolian population in terms of morphometric measurements and make a comparison with previous studies as well as giving a guidance to the surgeons. In this study, 60 dry adult sacrums (30 male and 30 female) were assessed for morphometric analysis. The measurement data for the sacrum and S1 vertebra revealed that there was no significant difference between both sexes except the sacral width and sacral canal width (p<0.05). In the present study, the ratio of S1 corpus' width to sacral width was lower in females compared with males. A detailed knowledge of the morphometric data about sacrum is very important for spinal surgery, as pedicle screw insertion is crucial in spinal instrumentation in order to prevent neurological injury and/or fixation failure.


Subject(s)
Sacrum/anatomy & histology , Adult , Body Weights and Measures , Female , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Spinal Canal/anatomy & histology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...