Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Reumatismo ; 65(3): 126-30, 2013 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23884028

ABSTRACT

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is an inclusive term in which those conditions disturbing the masticatory function are embraced. It has been estimated that 33% of the population have signs of TMD, but less than 5% of the population will require treatment. The objective of this study was to measure the frequency of TMD in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthrosis (OA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and systemic lupus erythematosus, and to define the limitations in everyday's life that patients perceive when present. A six-month survey of consecutive outpatients in a rheumatology clinic in a teaching hospital in Mexico was carried out. We defined TMD as: 1) the presence of pain; 2) difficulty on mouth opening, chewing or speaking; 3) the presence of non-harmonic movements of the temporomaxilar joints. All three characteristics had to be present. Z test was used to define differences between proportions. We present the results of 171 patients. Overall, 50 patients had TMD according to our operational definition (29.24%). Up to 76% of the sample had symptoms associated with the condition. TMD is more frequent in OA and in AS (29.24% vs 38% OA, P=0.009; 39% AS; P=0.005). We found no association between the severity of TMD and the request for specific attention for the discomfort produced by the condition. Only 8 of 50 (16%) patients with TMD had requested medical help for their symptoms, and they were not the most severe cases. TMD is more frequent in RA and OA. Although it may produce severe impairment, patients seem to adapt easily.


Subject(s)
Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/etiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 26(5): 929-32, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032832

ABSTRACT

Over the last few years, a growing number of rheumatologists has taken great interest in ultrasonography for its well known advantages and wide spectrum of validated applications in daily rheumatological practice. Most rheumatologists actively performing ultrasonography have had a training experience mainly based on attendance in sonographic courses and/or in radiological or rheumatological units. At present, in Mexico ultrasonography has a still limited diffusion among rheumatologists even if it may play a key role as a first line imaging technique also because of the restricted availability for rheumatic patients for other imaging modalities. This report describes the Mexican experience in education and training on musculoskeletal ultrasound. In 2003, the Mexican School of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound of the Mexican College of Rheumatology (ECOMER) was founded with the intention of joining efforts to launch musculoskeletal ultrasound in Mexico. Essential requirements shared by all the members of ECOMER include: to own an ultrasound machine, to incorporate ultrasonography into clinical daily practice and to keep up-to-date in musculoskeletal ultrasound. The motto of ECOMER is una clara imagen de la reumatologia which means a clear picture of rheumatology. The statute of ECOMER can be read in its web site: www.ecomer.org.mx. This web site also provides a forum for case discussion, consultation and image review.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing , Musculoskeletal System/diagnostic imaging , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Rheumatology/education , Clinical Competence , Humans , Mexico , Rheumatology/organization & administration , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data
3.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 33(5): 291-2, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16287551

ABSTRACT

A 33-yer-old woman with no history of atopy, diagnosed of psoriatic arthritis, received 200 mg I.V. infliximab, with previous oral administration of loratadine and betamethasone, that was well tolerated. Two minutes after a second infusion two weeks later, with the same pretreatment, the patients suffer dyspnea, laryngeal spasm, generalized tremor, vomiting, hypotension, sinusal tachycardia, anxiety and hyposemia. She recovered in 45 minutes, after the administration of I.V. hydrocortisone, chloropyramine, adrenaline and oxygen. Several reports of infliximab-induced anaphylactic reactions have been published, especially in patients with Crohn's disease, that have been attributed to a type I (acute or delayed) hypersensitivity reaction mechanism.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Adult , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Ethylenediamines/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Infliximab , Oxygen/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...