ABSTRACT
Closed reduction (CR) as an initial treatment for developmental hip dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children aged 24 to 36 months is debatable; however, it could have better results than open reduction (OR) or osteotomies, because it is minimally invasive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological results in children (24-36 months) with DDH initially treated with CR. Initial, subsequent, final anteroposterior pelvic radiological records were retrospectively analyzed. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute was used to classify the initial dislocations. To evaluate the final radiological results after CR (initial treatment) or additional treatment (CR failed), the Ömeroglu system was used (6 points excellent, 5 good, 4 fair-plus, 3 fair-minus, and ≤2 poor). The degree of acetabular dysplasia was estimated using the initial acetabular index and the final acetabular index, Buchholz-Ogden classification was used to measure avascular necrosis (AVN). A total of 98 radiological records were eligible, including 53 patients (65 hips). Fifteen hips (23.1%) were redislocated, OR with femoral osteotomy and pelvic osteotomy was the preferred surgical treatment 9 (13.8%). The initial acetabular index versus final acetabular index in total population was (38.9º ± 6.8º) and (31.9º ± 6.8º), respectively (t = 6.5, P < .001). The prevalence of AVN was 40%. Overall AVN in OR, femoral osteotomy and pelvic osteotomy were 73.3% versus CR 30%, P = .003. Unsatisfactory results ≤ 4 points on the Ömeroglu system were observed in hips that required OR with femoral and pelvic osteotomy. Hips with DDH treated with CR initially might had better radiological results than those treated with OR and femoral and pelvic osteotomies. Regular, good, and excellent results, ≥4 points on the Ömeroglu system, could be estimated in 57% of the cases, in whom CR was successful. AVN is frequently observed in hips with failed CR.
Subject(s)
Closed Fracture Reduction , Osteonecrosis , Humans , Academies and Institutes , Hyperplasia , Pelvis , Retrospective Studies , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depression is common among older people with hip fracture. AIM: To assess depression scores and other mental and physical health variables in older people with and without depression, admitted to a traumatology ward for a hip fracture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross sectional study of older patients admitted for surgical treatment of hip fracture. Demographic, clinical and laboratory variables were recorded. Twelve surveys were applied to assess general wellbeing, mental health, fall risk, nutritional status, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, social resources and depression (using Yesavage Depression Scale). RESULTS: We assessed 310 patients aged 78 (72-83) years, 72% women. Overall depression prevalence was 46% and its frequency was significantly higher in women, people over 81 years of age, diabetics and subjects with anxiety. The Yesavage score in patients with and without depression was 6.5 and 3, respectively. The median number of medications used by patients with and without depression was 3 and 2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high frequency of depression in these patients, especially in women and subjects older than 81 years of age. Routine geriatric assessments should be performed in hospitalized older patients with hip fracture.
Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Hip Fractures/psychology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Nutrition Assessment , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Depression is common among older people with hip fracture. Aim: To assess depression scores and other mental and physical health variables in older people with and without depression, admitted to a traumatology ward for a hip fracture. Material and Methods: Cross sectional study of older patients admitted for surgical treatment of hip fracture. Demographic, clinical and laboratory variables were recorded. Twelve surveys were applied to assess general wellbeing, mental health, fall risk, nutritional status, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, social resources and depression (using Yesavage Depression Scale). Results: We assessed 310 patients aged 78 (72-83) years, 72% women. Overall depression prevalence was 46% and its frequency was significantly higher in women, people over 81 years of age, diabetics and subjects with anxiety. The Yesavage score in patients with and without depression was 6.5 and 3, respectively. The median number of medications used by patients with and without depression was 3 and 2 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: There is a high frequency of depression in these patients, especially in women and subjects older than 81 years of age. Routine geriatric assessments should be performed in hospitalized older patients with hip fracture.
Antecedentes: La alta prevalencia de depresión en la población anciana con fractura de cadera rara vez se reconoce. Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia de depresión y comparar la salud física, mental, y otras variables geriátricas, en ancianos hospitalizados por fractura de cadera con y sin depresión. Material y Métodos: Estudio transversal con muestreo probabilístico con reemplazo, de pacientes que ingresaron para su atención quirúrgica. Se recolectaron variables sociodemográficas, antropométricas, clínicas y de laboratorio. Se aplicaron 12 encuestas para evaluar el estado de salud general, mental, riesgo de caídas, estado nutricional, actividades básicas e instrumentadas de la vida diaria, recursos sociales y depresión, entre otras. Para detectar depresión se usó la escala de tamizaje de Depresión Geriátrica Yesavage (EDG-15). Resultados: Se revisaron 310 pacientes (grupos con y sin depresión). La prevalencia de depresión fue de 46%, significativamente mayor en mujeres, sujetos mayores de 81 años, diabéticos y aquellos con ansiedad. La mediana de la puntuación EDG-15 fue de 6,5 y 3 para sujetos con y sin depresión (n = 142), (n = 168), respectivamente. La mediana del número de fármacos fue de 3 y 2 en estos grupos (p < 0,01). Conclusiones: La evaluación geriátrica sistemática en la atención del adulto mayor con fractura de cadera es indispensable, lo que podría aumentar las tasas de detección de depresión y de otros padecimientos e impactar positivamente en la calidad de vida y restauración de la función.
