Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Magn Reson Med ; 73(3): 939-50, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24604617

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Inaccuracy of conventional four-dimensional (4D) flow MR imaging in the presence of random unsteady and turbulent blood flow distal to a narrowing has been an important challenge. Previous investigations have revealed that shorter echo times (TE) decrease the errors, leading to more accurate flow assessments. METHODS: In this study, as part of a 4D flow acquisition, an Ultra-Short TE (UTE) method was adopted. UTE works based on a center-out radial k-space trajectory that inherently has a short TE. By employing free induction decay sampling starting from read-out gradient ramp-up, and by combining the refocusing lobe of the slice select gradient with the bipolar flow encoding gradient, TEs of ≈1 msec may be achieved. RESULTS: Both steady and pulsatile flow regimes, and in each case a range of Reynolds numbers, were studied in an in-vitro model. Flow assessment at low and medium flow rates demonstrated a good agreement between 4D UTE and conventional 4D flow techniques. However, 4D UTE flow significantly outperformed conventional 4D flow, at high flow rates for both steady and pulsatile flow regimes. Feasibility of the method in one patient with Aortic Stenosis was also demonstrated. CONCLUSION: For both steady and pulsatile high flow rates, the measured flow distal to the stenotic narrowing using conventional 4D flow revealed more than 20% error compared to the ground-truth flow. This error was reduced to less than 5% using the 4D UTE flow technique.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Blood Flow Velocity , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Rheology/methods , Algorithms , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Pulsatile Flow , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23365907

ABSTRACT

Assessment of blood flow is an important factor in diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Vascular stenosis result in disturbed blood flow, flow recirculation, turbulence, and flow jet. These types of flows cause erroneous quantification of blood flow using conventional Phase contrast (PC) MRI techniques. Previous investigations have revealed that shorter Echo Times (TE) can decrease the quantification errors. In this paper, we performed phantom studies under steady flow to validate the UTE technique. Investigation of three different constant flow rates revealed a significant improvement in flow quantification and reduction of flow artifacts in comparison to Cartesian Phase-Contrast MRI.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Radiography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...