Gastric distension with SLIPA versus LMA ProSeal during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared the quantitative clinical performances of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) regarding intensity of gastric distension in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A total of 124 anesthetized, paralyzed patients (ASA 1 to 2; aged, 18 to 80 y) were randomly allocated for airway management with the SLIPA or LMA ProSeal. After induction of general anesthesia using total intravenous anesthesia and rocuronium, the intensity of gastric distension was accessed twice by 2 raters, respectively. We also compared the fiberoptic bronchoscopic view of the glottis, the severity of blood stain, and postoperative sore throat. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for each gastric size. The change of gastric size within the SLIPA group was not statistically significant for both raters. Change within the LMA ProSeal group was significant in rater 2 (P=0.045) and marginally significant for rater 1 (P=0.056). Anatomic fit, complications during emergence, and the severity of blood stain and postoperative sore throat were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: SLIPA is as efficacious as LMA ProSeal for use in patients without severe complications who are undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Peritrocal and intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of peritrocal, intraperitoneal, or combined peritrocal-intraperitoneal ropivacaine on the parietal, visceral, and shoulder tip pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Eighty patients were randomly assigned to four groups. Group A received peritrocal and intraperitoneal saline. Group B received peritrocal saline and intraperitoneal ropivacaine. Group C received peritrocal ropivacaine and intraperitoneal saline. Group D received peritrocal and intraperitoneal ropivacaine. The parietal, visceral, and shoulder tip pain were assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). The frequency of the patient pushing the button of the PCA and fentanyl use were also recorded. RESULTS: In visceral pain, significantly lower VAS scores were observed in Group B from 2 to 4 h and in Group D from 2 to 8 h. In parietal pain, significantly lower VAS scores were observed in Group C from 4 to 24 h and in Group D from 2 to 12 h. In shoulder tip pain, significantly lower VAS scores were observed in Group B from 4 to 48 h and in Group D from 2 to 12 h. The fentanyl use and the frequency to push the button of the PCA were the highest in Group A and the lowest in Group D at every time point. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that peritrocal infiltration of ropivacaine significantly decreases parietal pain and intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine significantly decreases the visceral and shoulder tip pain. Their effects are additive with respect to the total pain.

Severe intraoperative hyponatremia associated with the absorption of irrigation fluid during hysteroscopic myomectomy: a case report.

A case of severe hyponatremia with accompanying pulmonary edema and cardiovascular instability during a hysteroscopic myomectomy with general anesthesia is presented. The patient's sodium value decreased to 87 mmol/L. She was managed with aggressive maneuvers, including an infusion of 3% hypertonic saline. The patient's serum sodium increased to 113 mmol/L at the end of the operation, and it was increased up to 138 mmol/L at 48 hours. The patient recovered completely without neurologic sequelae.

Less perilaryngeal gas leakage with SLIPA™ than with LMA-ProSeal™ in paralyzed patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA™) with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA-ProSeal™) in mechanically ventilated paralyzed patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. METHODS: One hundred and one patients were allocated randomly to SLIPA (n = 50) or to LMA-ProSeal (n = 51) treatment groups. After induction of general anesthesia and insertion of the assigned supralaryngeal airway (SLA) device, we made note of the occurrence of any gastric insufflation and perilaryngeal leakage. We then evaluated the anatomical fit of the SLA device using a fibreoptic bronchoscope, and we assessed the airway sealing pressure and respiratory mechanics with change in head position and during peritoneal insufflation. After surgery, we evaluated the severity of postoperative sore throat and the presence of blood or regurgitated fluid on the SLA device. RESULTS: The insertion success rate, gastric insufflation, perilaryngeal leakage, anatomical fit, airway sealing pressure, respiratory mechanics, severity of sore throat, and incidence of blood and regurgitated fluid on the device were similar between the two groups. The incidence of perilaryngeal leakage with changes in the patient's head position was lower with the SLIPA group than with the LMA-ProSeal group (3/50 vs 11/51, respectively; P = 0.026). During peritoneal insufflation, perilaryngeal leakage did not occur with the SLIPA but occurred in four cases with the LMA-ProSeal (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Both the SLIPA and the LMA-ProSeal can be used effectively and without severe complications in paralyzed patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. However, the SLIPA offers the advantage of less perilaryngeal gas leakage than the LMA-ProSeal with change in head position and during insufflation of the peritoneal cavity. This trial is registered with ANZCTR (ACTRN12609000914268).

The effects of changing from isoflurane to desflurane on the recovery profile during the latter part of anesthesia.

It is not known whether changing from isoflurane to desflurane during the latter part of anesthesia shows early emergence and recovery in long surgery. We therefore evaluated the effects of changing isoflurane to desflurane on emergence and recovery. Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive isoflurane (Group I) or desflurane (Group D) or to change from isoflurane to desflurane anesthesia (Group X). At the point when there was an hour until the operation would end, isoflurane was replaced with 1 MAC of desflurane in Group X, and isoflurane and desflurane were maintained at 1 MAC in Groups I and D. When the operation ended, we compared the emergence and recovery characteristics among the 3 groups. Compared with Group I, Group X showed faster emergence and recovery. Group X and Group D showed similar emergence and recovery. In conclusion, changing isoflurane to desflurane during the latter part of anesthesia improves emergence and recovery.

The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal during general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal (PLMA) during general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a SLIPA group (n = 30). Ease of use, first insertion success rate, hemodynamic responses to insertion, ventilatory efficiency and positioning confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy were assessed. Lung mechanics data were collected with side stream spirometry at 10 minutes after insertion. We also compared the incidence of blood stain, incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and other complications. RESULTS: First attempt success rates were 93.3% and 73.3%, and mean insertion time was 7.3 sec and 10.5 sec in PLMA and SLIPA. There was a significant rise in all of hemodynamic response from the pre-insertion value at one minute following insertion of SLIPA. But, insertion of PLMA was no significant rise in hemodynamic response. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean maximum sealing pressure, gas leakage, lung mechanics data, gastric distension, postoperative sore throat and other complication between the two groups. Blood stain were noted on the surface of the device in 40% (n = 12) in the SLIPA vs. 6.7% (n = 2) in the PLMA. CONCLUSIONS: The SLIPA is a useful alternative to the PLMA and have comparable efficacy and complication rates. If we acquire the skill to use, SLIPA may be considered as primary SGA devices during surgery under general anesthesia.

Spontaneous pneumothorax during laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy -A case report-.

Pneumothorax associated with a pneumoperitonium in laparoscopic surgery is rare but can cause life-threatening complications. A 62-year-old man was scheduled for a laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy under general anesthesia. Approximately 70 minutes after insufflating carbon dioxide into the intraabdominal cavity at a pressure of 12 mmHg, the peak inspiratory pressure increased, while the oxygen saturation decreased. The pneumothorax of the left lung was evident on the intraoperative chest radiograph. The pneumothorax improved after inserting a catheter into the affected area. The cause of the pneumothorax was unknown but an anatomical defect is believed responsible. This report shows that pneumothorax developed under an intraabdominal pressure in the conventional safety range. Careful monitoring and immediate treatment is necessary to prevent the condition from worsening.

Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in a patient with MELAS syndrome -A case report-.

A 23-year-old woman with MELAS (mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes) underwent a laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy. MELAS syndrome is a multisystemic disease caused by mitochondrial dysfunction. General anesthesia has several potential hazards to patients with MELAS syndrome, such as malignant hyperthermia, hypothermia, and metabolic acidosis. In this case, anesthesia was performed with propofol, remifentanil TCI, and atracurium without any surgical or anesthetic complications. We discuss the anesthetic effects of MELAS syndrome.

A comparative study on the efficacy and cardiovascular response generated by macintosh and pentax-AWS video laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation methods.

BACKGROUND: The Pentax-AWS is a newly developed rigid video laryngoscope. In comparison to the Macintosh laryngoscope, it offers a significantly improved laryngeal view and facilitates endotracheal intubation. The present study was performed to compare the general efficiency and the cardiovascular responses generated by Macintosh and Pentax-AWS systems during endotracheal intubation. METHODS: This study included 120 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class 1 or 2 requiring tracheal intubation for elective surgery. All patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Pentax-AWS (group P) and Macintosh (group M). Induction of anesthesia was performed using fentanyl, thiopental and succinylcholine intravenously. Systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, MBP, DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded just prior to induction, 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in SBP, MBP, DBP and HR between both groups. However, group P showed a higher POGO (Percentage of Glottic Opening) score than group M during endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of Pentax-AWS in endotracheal intubation did not increase hemodynamic changes compared to the use of Macintosh laryngoscope. Furthermore, Pentax-AWS offered an improved laryngeal view during endotracheal intubation.