Premedication before laryngoscopy in neonates: Evidence-based statement from the French society of neonatology (SFN).

Context: Laryngoscopy is frequently required in neonatal intensive care. Awake laryngoscopy has deleterious effects but practice remains heterogeneous regarding premedication use. The goal of this statement was to provide evidence-based good practice guidance for clinicians regarding premedication before tracheal intubation, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and laryngeal mask insertion in neonates. Methods: A group of experts brought together by the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) addressed 4 fields related to premedication before upper airway access in neonates: (1) tracheal intubation; (2) less invasive surfactant administration; (3) laryngeal mask insertion; (4) use of atropine for the 3 previous procedures. Evidence was gathered and assessed on predefined questions related to these fields. Consensual statements were issued using the GRADE methodology. Results: Among the 15 formalized good practice statements, 2 were strong recommendations to do (Grade 1+) or not to do (Grade 1-), and 4 were discretionary recommendations to do (Grade 2+). For 9 good practice statements, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert opinion. For tracheal intubation premedication was considered mandatory except for life-threatening situations (Grade 1+). Recommended premedications were a combination of opioid + muscle blocker (Grade 2+) or propofol in the absence of hemodynamic compromise or hypotension (Grade 2+) while the use of a sole opioid was discouraged (Grade 1-). Statements regarding other molecules before tracheal intubation were expert opinions. For LISA premedication was recommended (Grade 2+) with the use of propofol (Grade 2+). Statements regarding other molecules before LISA were expert opinions. For laryngeal mask insertion and atropine use, no specific data was found and expert opinions were provided. Conclusion: This statement should help clinical decision regarding premedication before neonatal upper airway access and favor standardization of practices.

Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB in France. METHODS: We analysed UOHB from the prospective AIE cohort from 25 prehospital emergency medical services in France. The primary outcome was the change in body temperature from arrival at scene to arrival at hospital. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 1854 UOHB were recorded, of whom 520 were analysed. We found that using incubator care was the most effective rewarming method (+ 0.8 °C during transport), followed by the combination of plastic bag, skin-to-skin and cap (+ 0.2 °C). The associations plastic bag + cap and skin-to-skin + cap did not allow the newborn to be warmed up but rather to maintain initial temperature (+ 0.0 °C). The results of the multivariate model were consistent with these observations, with better rewarming with the use of an incubator. We also identified circumstances of increased risk of hypothermia according to classification and regression tree, like premature birth (< 37 weeks of gestation) and/or low outside temperature (< 8.4 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Using an incubator was the most effective rewarming method during pre-hospital management of UOHB in our French prospective cohort. Based on our model, in cases of term less than 37 weeks of gestation or between 37 and 40 weeks with a low outside temperature or initial hypothermia, using such a method would be preferred.

Out-of-maternity deliveries in France: A nationwide population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: In France, many maternity hospitals have been closed as a result of hospital restructuring in an effort to reduce costs through economies of scale. These closures have naturally increased the distance between home and the closest maternity ward for women throughout the country. However, studies have shown a positive correlation between this increase in distance and the incidence of unplanned out-of-maternity deliveries (OMD). This study was conducted to estimate the frequency of OMD in France, to identify the main risk factors and to assess their impact on maternal mortality and neonatal morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based observational retrospective study using data from 2012 to 2014 obtained from the French hospital discharge database. We included 2,256,797 deliveries and 1,999,453 singleton newborns in mainland France, among which, 6,733 (3.0‰) were OMD. The adverse outcomes were maternal mortality in hospital or during transport, stillbirth, neonatal mortality, neonatal hospitalizations, and newborn hypothermia and polycythemia. The socio-residential environment was also included in the regression analysis. Maternal and newborn adverse outcomes associated with OMD were analyzed with Generalized Estimating Equations regressions. RESULTS: The distance to the nearest maternity unit was the main factor for OMD. OMD were associated with maternal death (aRR 6.5 [1.6-26.3]) and all of the neonatal adverse outcomes: stillbirth (3.3 [2.8-3.8]), neonatal death (1.9 [1.2-3.1]), neonatal hospitalization (1.2 [1.1-1.3]), newborn hypothermia (5.9 [5.2-6.6]) and newborn polycythemia (4.8 [3.5-6.4]). DISCUSSION: In France, OMD increased over the study period. OMD were associated with all the adverse outcomes studied for mothers and newborns. Caregivers, including emergency teams, need to be better prepared for the management these at-risk cases. Furthermore, the increase in adverse outcomes, and the additional generated costs, should be considered carefully by the relevant authorities before any decisions are made to close or merge existing maternity units.

Premedication practices for tracheal intubation in neonates transported by French medical transport teams: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubations have not yet been described for neonatal transport teams. Our objective is to describe the use of sedation/analgesia (SA) for tracheal intubations and to assess its tolerance in neonates transported by medical transport teams in France. SETTING: This prospective observational study was part of the EPIPPAIN 2 project and collected around-the-clock data on SA practices in neonates intubated by all five paediatric medical transport teams of the Paris region during a 2-month period. Intubations were classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent. Sedation level and conditions of intubation were assessed with the Tonus, Reactivity, Awareness and Conditions of intubation to Help in Endotracheal intubation Assessment (TRACHEA score). The scores range from 0 to 10 representing an increasing ladder from adequate to inadequate sedation, and from excellent to very poor conditions of intubation. PARTICIPANTS: 40 neonates intubated in 28 different centres. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 34.9 (3.9) weeks, and 62.5% were intubated in the delivery room. 30/40 (75%) of intubations were performed with the use of SA. In 18/30 (60.0%) intubations performed with SA, the drug regimen was the association of sufentanil and midazolam. Atropine was given in 19/40 intubations. From the 16, 21 and 3 intubations classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent, respectively, 8 (50%), 19 (90.5%) and 3 (100%) were performed with SA premedication. 79.3% of intubations performed with SA had TRACHEA scores of 3 or less. 22/40 (55%) infants had at least one of the following adverse events: muscle rigidity, bradycardia below 100/min, desaturation below 80% and nose or pharynx-larynx bleeding. 7/24 (29.2%) of those who had only one attempt presented at least one of these adverse events compared with 15/16 (93.8%) of those who needed two or more attempts (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: SA premedication is largely feasible for tracheal intubations performed in neonates transported by medical transport teams including intubations judged as emergent or semiemergent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01346813; Results.

Pain Assessment in Children Younger Than 8 Years in Out-of-Hospital Emergency Medicine: Reliability and Validity of EVENDOL Score.

OBJECTIVE: Pain in children is underestimated and undertreated in out-of-hospital emergency medicine. In this setting, caregivers need a reliable pain scale, but none has been validated. A single observational pain scale for all children younger than 8 years, EVENDOL, has been validated in emergency pediatric units. We study the feasibility of EVENDOL score in an out-of-hospital emergency setting. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included all conscious children younger than 8 years transported by a mobile intensive care unit between October 2008 and May 2010. The emergency physician and nurse independently assessed the child's pain using first a numeric rating scale (score 0-10), then the 5-item EVENDOL scale (verbal/vocal expression, facial expression, movements, postures, and relationship with entourage) (score 0-3/item) at 3 time points (at rest, during examination, and after analgesia). We studied the scale's internal validity, interrater reliability, discriminant ability (influence of fever and anxiety), and face validity. RESULTS: Of the 422 included children, 82 and 62 (29%-39%) were in pain according to the emergency physician and nurses (numeric rating scale >3/10). All EVENDOL scale attributes were satisfied at all 3 time points, for all population subsets. Values for the first assessment (entire study population) were as follows: internal validity (0.78-0.89), interrater reliability (r = 0.63-0.76, weighted κ = 0.49-0.65), construct validity, and discriminant ability (r = 0.6-0.7). Fever did not impact on EVENDOL score. Anxiety level and pain were correlated. Completion time was fast (mean, 2.3-3.4 minutes). Face validity was good. CONCLUSION: EVENDOL is a quick, easy-to-use, discriminant instrument to assess pain in young children in out-of-hospital emergency settings.

Correction: Passive hypothermia (≥35 - <36°C) during transport of newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170100.].

Guidelines for care of the newborn baby at birth knowledge by prehospital emergency physicians.

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, the International Liaison Committee On Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines for care of the newborn baby immediately after birth were published. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a questionnaire that was distributed to a sample of 44 prehospital emergency physicians (April 2014), we assessed knowledge of these guidelines, in particular specificities for newborns as compared to adults. Twenty-five questions, starting with a birth with no problems to one resulting in neonatal distress, were used to profile the practice of the surveyed physicians. RESULTS: Among the solicited physicians, 30 responded to the questionnaire (68%). Priority was given to efficient respiratory resuscitation during the first minutes of extrauterine life and the difficulties of newborn respiratory adaptation are well-known, but their implementation remains imperfectly understood. The assessment showed very mixed results, partly explained by the low frequency of newborn scenarios experienced by the practitioners who responded to the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: To move from guidelines to their practical implementation is always delicate, with room for improvement such as continuing education, knowledge assessment and practice in the context of a quality approach. Well accepted, this evaluation process could be renewed upon publication of the next guidelines on this subject, thus contributing to their knowledge.

Outcomes of Preterm Neonates Transferred Between Tertiary Perinatal Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To verify if preterm neonates transferred between tertiary referral centers have worse outcomes than matched untransferred infants. DESIGN: Cohort study with a historically matched control group. SETTING: Two tertiary-level neonatal ICUs. PATIENTS: Seventy-five neonates per group. INTERVENTIONS: Transfer between tertiary-level neonatal ICUs carried out by a fully equipped transportation team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured in-hospital mortality, frequency of intraventricular hemorrhage greater than 2nd grade, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis greater than or equal to grade 2, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, composite outcomes (in-hospital mortality/bronchopulmonary dysplasia, in-hospital mortality/intraventricular hemorrhage > 2nd grade, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia/periventricular leukomalacia/intraventricular hemorrhage > 2nd grade), length of neonatal ICU stay, weight at discharge, and time spent on ventilatory support. Seventy-five similar (except for antenatal steroids administration) neonates were enrolled in each cohort. Cohorts did not differ in mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage greater than 2nd grade, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis greater than or equal to grade 2, any composite outcomes, neonatal ICU stay, weight at discharge, and duration of respiratory support. Results were unchanged adjusting for antenatal steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal transfer between tertiary-level centers does not impact on clinical outcomes, if performed under optimal conditions.

Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm neonates in Europe: results from the MOSAIC cohort.

BACKGROUND: A considerable local variability in the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has been recorded previously. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present study were to describe regional differences in the rate of BPD in very preterm neonates from a European population-based cohort and to further delineate risk factors. METHODS: 4,185 survivors to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age of 4,984 live-born infants born at 24+0-31+6 weeks' gestation in 2003 (the MOSAIC cohort) in 10 European regions were enrolled using predefined structured questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall median gestational age of preterms without BPD was 30 weeks (range 23-31), median birth weight 1,320 g (range 490-3,150) compared with 27 weeks (23-31) and 900 g (370-2,460) in those with BPD. The region-specific crude rate of BPD ranged from 10.2% (Italian region) to 24.8% (UK Northern region). Maternal hypertension, immaturity, male gender, small for gestational age, Apgar <7 and region of care were associated with an increased incidence of BPD on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: A wide variability of BPD between European regions may be explained by different local practices; the strongest association however was with degree of immaturity.

Differences in rates and short-term outcome of live births before 32 weeks of gestation in Europe in 2003: results from the MOSAIC cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Advances in perinatal medicine increased survival after very preterm birth in all countries, but comparative population-based data on these births are not readily available. This analysis contrasts the rates and short-term outcome of live births before 32 weeks of gestation in 10 European regions. METHODS: The Models of Organizing Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births (MOSAIC) study collected prospective data on all very preterm births in 10 European regions covering 494,463 total live births in 2003. The analysis sample was live births between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation without lethal congenital anomalies (N = 4908). Outcomes were rates of preterm birth, in-hospital mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage grades III and IV or cystic periventricular leukomalacia and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Mortality and morbidity rates were standardized for gestational age and gender. RESULTS: Live births between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation were 9.9 per 1000 total live births with a range from 7.6 to 13.0 in the MOSAIC regions. Standardized mortality was doubled in high versus low mortality regions (18%-20% vs 7%-9%) and differed for infants < or = 28 weeks of gestation as well as 28 to 31 weeks of gestation. Morbidity among survivors also varied (intraventricular hemorrhage/periventricular leukomalacia ranged from 2.6% to < or = 10% and bronchopulmonary dysplasia from 10.5% to 21.5%) but differed from mortality rankings. A total of 85.2 very preterm infants per 10,000 total live births were discharged from the hospital alive with a range from 64.1 to 117.1; the range was 10 to 31 per 10,000 live births for infants discharged with a diagnosis of neurologic or respiratory morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Very preterm mortality and morbidity differed between European regions, raising questions about variability in treatment provided to these infants. Comparative follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of these differences on rates of cerebral palsy and other disabilities associated with preterm birth.

Risk factors for not delivering in a level III unit before 32 weeks of gestation: results from a population-based study in Paris and surrounding districts in 2003.

Delivery of very preterm babies in maternity units with on-site neonatal intensive care (level III units) is associated with lower mortality and morbidity. This analysis explores risk factors for not delivering in a level III unit, using data from a population-based study of very preterm births in Paris and surrounding districts in 2003. The sample for analysis included resident women with a fetus alive at the onset of labour between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation (n = 641). Characteristics of women delivering in and those not in level III units were compared using logistic regression. Further analysis was carried out for the subgroup of women not already scheduled to deliver in a level III unit. Twenty-nine per cent of women did not deliver in level III units; in the subgroup scheduled to deliver in level I or II units, 43% were not transferred. Women were less likely to deliver in a level III unit if they had a singleton pregnancy, a gestation of <26 weeks or at 31 weeks, experienced antenatal haemorrhaging, lived in socially deprived neighbourhoods or at a greater distance from the nearest level III. Women scheduled to deliver in a maternity unit with a special care nursery were also less likely to deliver in a level III unit. In contrast, preterm rupture of membranes and fetal growth restriction increased the likelihood of a level III delivery. These results underline the importance of controlling for clinical characteristics when analysing perinatal outcome by place of delivery and show how socioeconomic factors, known to impact on the risk of having a preterm birth, can also affect access to appropriate care.