ABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Chemical Warfare Agents/adverse effects , Chlorine/administration & dosage , Chlorine/adverse effects , Respiratory Function Tests , Cross-Sectional Studies , Administration, Inhalation , Biomarkers , Healthy Volunteers , Inhalation Exposure , Leukocyte Count , Pilot Projects , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of leukotrienes (LTs) in the pathophysiology of isocyanate-induced asthma is not well known. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the type of airway inflammation induced by exposure to isocyanates and to investigate whether exposure to isocyanates induced an increase in LT receptor cysteinyl leukotriene ((CysLT)(1), CysLT(2) and leukotriene B(4) receptor (BLT(1))) expression, as well as a release of LT (LTC(4) and leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4))) and IL-8 in both asthmatics with isocyanate-induced asthma and healthy subjects. METHODS: We investigated eight subjects with isocyanate-induced asthma and eight healthy subjects. Both groups underwent specific inhalation challenges to isocyanates in the laboratory. Induced sputum was collected before and after exposure to isocyanates. CysLT(1), CysLT(2) and BLT(1) expression was assessed by flow cytometry, whereas LTC(4), LTB(4) and IL-8 were measured in the sputum supernatants by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Exposure to isocyanates induced an increase in sputum neutrophils only in subjects with occupational asthma. There was a significant increase in CysLT(1) and BLT(1) receptor expression, as well as a release of LTB(4) and IL-8 after exposure to isocyanates compared with the baseline, only in subjects with isocyanate-induced asthma, whereas there was no increase in LTC(4). Exposure to isocyanates did not induce any change in LT receptor expression nor in the levels of LTC(4), LTB(4) and IL-8, in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The neutrophilia observed after exposure to isocyanates is likely to be related to the release of LTB(4), probably enhanced by the increased expression of BLT(1) on neutrophils as well as by the release of IL-8. The significance of the increase of CysLT1 receptor expression on neutrophils is unknown and needs further investigation.
Subject(s)
Asthma/chemically induced , Isocyanates/toxicity , Leukotrienes/physiology , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Adult , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchial Provocation Tests/methods , Cysteine/blood , Cysteine/metabolism , Female , Humans , Interleukin-8 , Leukotrienes/blood , Leukotrienes/metabolism , Macrophages/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/metabolism , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Receptors, Leukotriene B4 , Receptors, Purinergic P2/blood , Receptors, Purinergic P2/metabolism , Sputum/cytology , Sputum/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Exposure to occupational agents can induce eosinophilic inflammation in subjects with occupational asthma (OA). It might also induce nonspecific changes in airway inflammation in subjects without OA. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the changes in airway inflammation induced by exposure to occupational agents in subjects with and without OA and to determine which changes in sputum eosinophil numbers and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine should be regarded as clinically significant for predicting a 20% fall in FEV(1). METHODS: We performed specific inhalation challenges (SICs) in 3 groups of subjects: subjects reporting a history consistent with OA with a positive SIC response (n = 17); subjects reporting a history consistent with OA with a negative SIC response (n = 14); and asthmatic subjects without any history of OA (n = 10). Induced sputum and methacholine challenges were performed at the end of the control day and again at the end of the last day of exposure; the last day of exposure was always performed in the laboratory. RESULTS: There was an increase in median sputum eosinophil and neutrophil numbers in subjects with positive SIC responses. Cell counts remained unchanged after exposure in asthmatic subjects without OA. A combination of a greater than 0.26 10(6)/mL increase in sputum eosinophil numbers and a decrease in the concentration of methacholine inducing a 20% fall in FEV(1) of at least 1.8-fold compared with baseline values predicted a 20% fall in FEV(1) in 96% (95% CI, 70%-99%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Exposure to occupational agents per se does not induce airway inflammation. Changes in both sputum eosinophil counts and methacholine responsiveness are satisfactory predictors of a significant bronchial responsiveness to occupational agents.
