Collateral circulation assessment within the 4.5 h time window in patients with and without DWI/FLAIR MRI mismatch.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the association between collateral status and DWI-FLAIR mismatch in patients with acute ischemic stroke within the 4.5 h time-window. METHODS: We analysed DWI, FLAIR, and PWI data in patients within 4.5 h after symptom onset from the I-KNOW European database. Collateral flow maps were graded by analyzing contrast 'staining' extent over the early, mid and late perfusion phases. ADC values, DWI lesion volume, and normalised perfusion parameters (CBV,Tmax) within DWI lesions were determined. Visibility of parenchymal hyperintensivty on FLAIR was evaluated ("FLAIR positive"), and DWI-FLAIR mismatch was assessed. Spontaneously reperfused regions were defined as voxels with Tmax <6 s within the DWI lesion. Final infarct size was assessed on day-30 FLAIR images. RESULTS: Of the 168 patients included in I-KNOW database, 87 were eligible for this study. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was present in 69 patients. There was no difference between poor and good collaterals status according to age, sex, baseline NIHSS score, time to MRI and DWI lesion volume. Collateral status was significantly better in the FLAIR positive group (p = .001). Patients with poor collaterals had significantly increased Tmax (p = .005). Baseline DWI lesion volume and final lesion volume were significantly smaller in patients with good collateral status (p < .001 and 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with early FLAIR lesion visibility have a better collateral status. This finding has implications for the management of stroke patients with unknown time-of-onset, and more widely should be considered in the current context of extending the therapeutic window.

Does b1000-b0 Mismatch Challenge Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch in Stroke?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to explore whether the mismatch in lesion visibility between b1000 and b0 images is an alternative to mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging as a surrogate marker of stroke age. METHODS: We analyzed patients from the European multicenter I-KNOW database. Independent readers assessed the visibility of ischemic lesions of the anterior circulation on b0 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images. The signal-intensity ratio for b0 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images was also measured from the segmented stroke lesion volume on b1000 images. RESULTS: This study included 112 patients (68 men; mean age, 67.4 years) with stroke onset within (n=85) or longer than (n=27) 4.5 hours. b1000-b0 mismatch identified patients within 4.5 hours of stroke onset with moderate sensitivity (72.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5-82.4) and specificity (70.4%; 95% CI, 53.2-87.6), high positive predictive value (88.6%; 95% CI, 81.1-96.0), and low negative predictive value (45.2%; 95% CI, 30.2-60.3). Global comparison of b1000-b0 mismatch with diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging mismatch (considered the imaging gold standard) indicated high sensitivity (85.9%; 95% CI, 78.2-93.6), specificity (91.2%; 95% CI, 76.3-98.1), and positive predictive value (96.7%; 95% CI, 88.0-99.1) and moderate negative predictive value (73.8%; 95% CI, 60.5-87.1) of this new approach. b0 signal-intensity ratio (r=0.251; 95% CI, 0.069-0.417; P=0.008) was significantly although weakly correlated with delay between stroke onset and magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: b1000-b0 mismatch may identify patients with ischemic stroke of the within 4.5 hours of onset with high positive predictive value, perhaps constituting an alternative imaging tissue clock.