Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Development ; 151(3)2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345109

ABSTRACT

The field of developmental biology has declined in prominence in recent decades, with off-shoots from the field becoming more fashionable and highly funded. This has created inequity in discovery and opportunity, partly due to the perception that the field is antiquated or not cutting edge. A 'think tank' of scientists from multiple developmental biology-related disciplines came together to define specific challenges in the field that may have inhibited innovation, and to provide tangible solutions to some of the issues facing developmental biology. The community suggestions include a call to the community to help 'rebrand' the field, alongside proposals for additional funding apparatuses, frameworks for interdisciplinary innovative collaborations, pedagogical access, improved science communication, increased diversity and inclusion, and equity of resources to provide maximal impact to the community.


Subject(s)
Developmental Biology
2.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1287459, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361931

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Limitations in early detection and treatment barriers contribute to the lack of substantial success in the treatment of this challenging-to-treat malignancy. Desmoplasia is the hallmark of PDAC microenvironment that creates a physical and immunologic barrier. Stromal support cells and immunomodulatory cells face aberrant signaling by pancreatic cancer cells that shifts the complex balance of proper repair mechanisms into a state of dysregulation. The product of this dysregulation is the desmoplastic environment that encases the malignant cells leading to a dense, hypoxic environment that promotes further tumorigenesis, provides innate systemic resistance, and suppresses anti-tumor immune invasion. This desmoplastic environment combined with the immunoregulatory events that allow it to persist serve as the primary focus of this review. The physical barrier and immune counterbalance in the tumor microenvironment (TME) make PDAC an immunologically cold tumor. To convert PDAC into an immunologically hot tumor, tumor microenvironment could be considered alongside the tumor cells. We discuss the complex network of microenvironment molecular and cellular composition and explore how they can be targeted to overcome immuno-therapeutic challenges.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Tumor Microenvironment , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Signal Transduction , Immunomodulation
3.
Transl Oncol ; 15(1): 101262, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768100

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cancer (PaC) is resistant to immune checkpoint therapy, but the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. In this study, we have established four orthotopic PaC murine models with different PaC cell lines by intra-pancreatic inoculation. Therapeutic examinations demonstrate that only tumors induced with Panc02-H7 cells respond to αPD-1 antibody treatment, leading to significantly reduced tumor growth and increased survival in the recipient mice. Transcriptomic profiling at a single-cell resolution characterizes the molecular activity of different cells within tumors. Comparative analysis and validated experiments demonstrate that αPD-1-sensitive and -resistant tumors differently shape the immune landscape in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and markedly altering effector CD8+ T cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in their number, frequency, and gene profile. More exhausted effector CD8+ T cells and increased M2-like TAMs with a reduced capacity of antigen presentation are detected in resistant Panc02-formed tumors versus responsive Panc02-H7-formed tumors. Together, our data highlight the correlation of tumor-induced imbalance of macrophages with the fate of tumor-resident effector CD8+ T cells and PaC response to αPD-1 immunotherapy. TAMs as a critical regulator of tumor immunity and immunotherapy contribute to PaC resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.

4.
Commun Biol ; 4(1): 374, 2021 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742110

ABSTRACT

Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with tumor resistance to radiation therapy. Cell-cell interactions in the tumor microenvironment (TME) profoundly influence therapy outcomes. However, the nature of these interactions and their role in Ras tumor radioresistance remain unclear. Here we use Drosophila oncogenic Ras tissues and human Ras cancer cell radiation models to address these questions. We discover that cellular response to genotoxic stress cooperates with oncogenic Ras to activate JAK/STAT non-cell autonomously in the TME. Specifically, p53 is heterogeneously activated in Ras tumor tissues in response to irradiation. This mosaicism allows high p53-expressing Ras clones to stimulate JAK/STAT cytokines, which activate JAK/STAT in the nearby low p53-expressing surviving Ras clones, leading to robust tumor re-establishment. Blocking any part of this cell-cell communication loop re-sensitizes Ras tumor cells to irradiation. These findings suggest that coupling STAT inhibitors to radiotherapy might improve clinical outcomes for Ras cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Genes, ras , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Radiation Tolerance , STAT Transcription Factors/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , A549 Cells , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cytokines/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/radiation effects , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Janus Kinases/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Male , Mice, Nude , Mice, Transgenic , Paracrine Communication , Radiation Tolerance/genetics , STAT Transcription Factors/genetics , Signal Transduction , Tumor Burden/radiation effects , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
5.
Dev Biol ; 469: 37-45, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022230

ABSTRACT

How organisms control organ size is not fully understood. We found that Syd/JIP3 is required for proper wing size in Drosophila. JIP3 mutations are associated with organ size defects in mammals. The underlying mechanisms are not well understood. We discovered that Syd/JIP3 inhibition results in a downregulation of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (Diap1) in the Drosophila wing. Correspondingly, Syd/JIP3 deficient tissues exhibit ectopic cell death and yield smaller wings. Syd/JIP3 inhibition generated similar effects in mammalian cells, indicating a conserved mechanism. We found that Yorkie/YAP stimulates Syd/JIP3 in Drosophila and mammalian cells. Notably, Syd/JIP3 is required for the full effect of Yorkie-mediated tissue growth. Thus Syd/JIP3 regulation of Diap1 functions downstream of Yorkie/YAP to control growth. This study provides mechanistic insights into the recent and perplexing link between JIP3 mutations and organ size defects in mammals, including in humans where de novo JIP3 variants are associated with microcephaly.


Subject(s)
Carrier Proteins/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/physiology , Wings, Animal/growth & development , Animals , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/anatomy & histology , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Organ Size , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Wings, Animal/anatomy & histology , YAP-Signaling Proteins
6.
Nat Commun ; 8: 14688, 2017 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28281543

ABSTRACT

Multiple signalling events interact in cancer cells. Oncogenic Ras cooperates with Egfr, which cannot be explained by the canonical signalling paradigm. In turn, Egfr cooperates with Hedgehog signalling. How oncogenic Ras elicits and integrates Egfr and Hedgehog signals to drive overgrowth remains unclear. Using a Drosophila tumour model, we show that Egfr cooperates with oncogenic Ras via Arf6, which functions as a novel regulator of Hh signalling. Oncogenic Ras induces the expression of Egfr ligands. Egfr then signals through Arf6, which regulates Hh transport to promote Hh signalling. Blocking any step of this signalling cascade inhibits Hh signalling and correspondingly suppresses the growth of both, fly and human cancer cells harbouring oncogenic Ras mutations. These findings highlight a non-canonical Egfr signalling mechanism, centered on Arf6 as a novel regulator of Hh signalling. This explains both, the puzzling requirement of Egfr in oncogenic Ras-mediated overgrowth and the cooperation between Egfr and Hedgehog.


Subject(s)
ADP-Ribosylation Factors/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Hedgehog Proteins/genetics , IMP Dehydrogenase/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Receptors, Invertebrate Peptide/genetics , ADP-Ribosylation Factor 6 , ADP-Ribosylation Factors/metabolism , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Models, Animal , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/pathology , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Genes, Reporter , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Hedgehog Proteins/metabolism , Humans , IMP Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Imaginal Discs/metabolism , Imaginal Discs/pathology , Larva/genetics , Larva/metabolism , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Receptors, Invertebrate Peptide/metabolism , Signal Transduction
8.
Neuron ; 84(6): 1226-39, 2014 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25521378

ABSTRACT

Exome sequencing analysis of over 2,000 children with complex malformations of cortical development identified five independent (four homozygous and one compound heterozygous) deleterious mutations in KATNB1, encoding the regulatory subunit of the microtubule-severing enzyme Katanin. Mitotic spindle formation is defective in patient-derived fibroblasts, a consequence of disrupted interactions of mutant KATNB1 with KATNA1, the catalytic subunit of Katanin, and other microtubule-associated proteins. Loss of KATNB1 orthologs in zebrafish (katnb1) and flies (kat80) results in microcephaly, recapitulating the human phenotype. In the developing Drosophila optic lobe, kat80 loss specifically affects the asymmetrically dividing neuroblasts, which display supernumerary centrosomes and spindle abnormalities during mitosis, leading to cell cycle progression delays and reduced cell numbers. Furthermore, kat80 depletion results in dendritic arborization defects in sensory and motor neurons, affecting neural architecture. Taken together, we provide insight into the mechanisms by which KATNB1 mutations cause human cerebral cortical malformations, demonstrating its fundamental role during brain development.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics , Brain/abnormalities , Brain/pathology , Microcephaly/genetics , Neural Stem Cells/pathology , Neurogenesis/genetics , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/abnormalities , Animals , Brain/growth & development , Cell Count , Cell Division/genetics , Dendrites/genetics , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Humans , Katanin , Mice , Microcephaly/pathology , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Spindle Apparatus/genetics , Zebrafish
9.
Development ; 141(24): 4729-39, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411211

ABSTRACT

Oncogenic mutations in Ras deregulate cell death and proliferation to cause cancer in a significant number of patients. Although normal Ras signaling during development has been well elucidated in multiple organisms, it is less clear how oncogenic Ras exerts its effects. Furthermore, cancers with oncogenic Ras mutations are aggressive and generally resistant to targeted therapies or chemotherapy. We identified the exocytosis component Sec15 as a synthetic suppressor of oncogenic Ras in an in vivo Drosophila mosaic screen. We found that oncogenic Ras elevates exocytosis and promotes the export of the pro-apoptotic ligand Eiger (Drosophila TNF). This blocks tumor cell death and stimulates overgrowth by activating the JNK-JAK-STAT non-autonomous proliferation signal from the neighboring wild-type cells. Inhibition of Eiger/TNF exocytosis or interfering with the JNK-JAK-STAT non-autonomous proliferation signaling at various steps suppresses oncogenic Ras-mediated overgrowth. Our findings highlight important cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic roles of exocytosis during oncogenic growth and provide a new class of synthetic suppressors for targeted therapy approaches.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/growth & development , Exocytosis/physiology , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , ras Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Blotting, Western , Cell Proliferation/physiology , DNA Primers/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Immunoprecipitation , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Signal Transduction/physiology
10.
Dev Biol ; 330(2): 399-405, 2009 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19374896

ABSTRACT

Asymmetric cell division is a mechanism for generating cell diversity as well as maintaining stem cell homeostasis in both Drosophila and mammals. In Drosophila, larval neuroblasts are stem cell-like progenitors that divide asymmetrically to generate neurons of the adult brain. Mitotic neuroblasts localize atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) to their apical cortex. Cortical aPKC excludes cortical localization of Miranda and its cargo proteins Prospero and Brain tumor, resulting in their partitioning into the differentiating, smaller ganglion mother cell (GMC) where they are required for neuronal differentiation. In addition to aPKC, the kinases Aurora-A and Polo also regulate neuroblast self-renewal, but the phosphatases involved in neuroblast self-renewal have not been identified. Here we report that aPKC is in a protein complex in vivo with Twins, a Drosophila B-type protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) subunit, and that Twins and the catalytic subunit of PP2A, called Microtubule star (Mts), are detected in larval neuroblasts. Both Twins and Mts are required to exclude aPKC from the basal neuroblast cortex: twins mutant brains, twins mutant single neuroblast mutant clones, or mts dominant negative single neuroblast clones all show ectopic basal cortical localization of aPKC. Consistent with ectopic basal aPKC is the appearance of supernumerary neuroblasts in twins mutant brains or twins mutant clones. We conclude that Twins/PP2A is required to maintain aPKC at the apical cortex of mitotic neuroblasts, keeping it out of the differentiating GMC, and thereby maintaining neuroblast homeostasis.


Subject(s)
Cell Polarity , Protein Kinase C/metabolism , Protein Phosphatase 2/metabolism , Animals , Catalytic Domain , Drosophila/embryology , Immunoprecipitation
11.
Development ; 135(16): 2739-46, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18614576

ABSTRACT

The atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is required for cell polarization of many cell types, and is upregulated in several human tumors. Despite its importance in cell polarity and growth control, relatively little is known about how aPKC activity is regulated. Here, we use a biochemical approach to identify Dynamin-associated protein 160 (Dap160; related to mammalian intersectin) as an aPKC-interacting protein in Drosophila. We show that Dap160 directly interacts with aPKC, stimulates aPKC activity in vitro and colocalizes with aPKC at the apical cortex of embryonic neuroblasts. In dap160 mutants, aPKC is delocalized from the neuroblast apical cortex and has reduced activity, based on its inability to displace known target proteins from the basal cortex. Both dap160 and aPKC mutants have fewer proliferating neuroblasts and a prolonged neuroblast cell cycle. We conclude that Dap160 positively regulates aPKC activity and localization to promote neuroblast cell polarity and cell cycle progression.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila/embryology , Neurons/physiology , Protein Kinase C/metabolism , Stem Cells/physiology , Vesicular Transport Proteins/physiology , Animals , Cell Cycle/physiology , Cell Polarity/physiology , Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Enzyme Activation , Larva , Mutation , Protein Binding , Protein Kinase C/genetics , Vesicular Transport Proteins/genetics
12.
J Cell Sci ; 120(Pt 18): 3200-6, 2007 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17726059

ABSTRACT

Cdc42 recruits Par-6-aPKC to establish cell polarity from worms to mammals. Although Cdc42 is reported to have no function in Drosophila neuroblasts, a model for cell polarity and asymmetric cell division, we show that Cdc42 colocalizes with Par-6-aPKC at the apical cortex in a Bazooka-dependent manner, and is required for Par-6-aPKC localization. Loss of Cdc42 disrupts neuroblast polarity: cdc42 mutant neuroblasts have cytoplasmic Par-6-aPKC, and this phenotype is mimicked by neuroblast-specific expression of a dominant-negative Cdc42 protein or a Par-6 protein that lacks Cdc42-binding ability. Conversely, expression of constitutively active Cdc42 leads to ectopic Par-6-aPKC localization and corresponding cell polarity defects. Bazooka remains apically enriched in cdc42 mutants. Robust Cdc42 localization requires Par-6, indicating the presence of feedback in this pathway. In addition to regulating Par-6-aPKC localization, Cdc42 increases aPKC activity by relieving Par-6 inhibition. We conclude that Cdc42 regulates aPKC localization and activity downstream of Bazooka, thereby directing neuroblast cell polarity and asymmetric cell division.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Cell Polarity/physiology , Central Nervous System/embryology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Protein Kinase C/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Animals , Cell Division/physiology , Central Nervous System/cytology , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster , GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics , Genes, Dominant , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Mutation , Organ Specificity/physiology , Protein Binding/physiology , Protein Kinase C/genetics , Protein Transport/physiology , Stem Cells/cytology , cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein/genetics
13.
J Cell Sci ; 117(Pt 25): 6061-70, 2004 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15536119

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila tumor suppressor protein Scribble is required for epithelial polarity, neuroblast polarity, neuroblast spindle asymmetry and limiting cell proliferation. It is a member of the newly described LAP protein family, containing 16 leucine rich repeats (LRRs), four PDZ domains and an extensive carboxyl-terminal (CT) domain. LRR and PDZ domains mediate protein-protein interactions, but little is know about their function within LAP family proteins. We have determined the role of the LRR, PDZ and CT domains for Scribble localization in neuroblasts and epithelia, and for Scribble function in neuroblasts. We found that the LRR and PDZ domains are both required for proper targeting of Scribble to septate junctions in epithelia; that the LRR domain is necessary and sufficient for cortical localization in mitotic neuroblasts, and that the PDZ2 domain is required for efficient cortical and apical localization of Scribble in neuroblasts. In addition, we show that the LRR domain is sufficient to target Miranda protein to the neuroblast cortex, but that LRR+PDZ will exclude Miranda from the cortex. Our results highlight the importance of both LRR and PDZ domains for the proper localization and function of Scribble in neuroblasts.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/chemistry , Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Animals , Blotting, Western , Body Patterning , Cell Cycle Proteins/chemistry , Cell Proliferation , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/cytology , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelium/metabolism , Gene Deletion , Genotype , Histones/chemistry , Immunohistochemistry , Leucine/chemistry , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Mitosis , Neurons/metabolism , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Spindle Apparatus/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...