ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes among women with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) who declined induction and chose outpatient expectant management compared with those admitted for induction. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of term women with singleton, vertex-presenting fetuses who presented with PROM between July 2016 and June 2017 and were eligible for outpatient expectant management (n = 166). The primary outcomes were time from PROM to delivery and time from admission to delivery. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were also compared between groups. Multivariable linear regressions were used to assess time differences between groups, adjusting for known maternal and pregnancy characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with admitted patients, women managed expectantly at home had significantly longer PROM to delivery intervals (median 29.2 vs. 17 hours, p < 0.001), but were more likely to deliver within 24 hours of admission (95.1 vs. 82.9%, p = 0.004). In the adjusted analysis, PROM to delivery was 7 hours longer (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-10.0) and admission to delivery was 5.3 hours shorter (95% CI: 2.8-7.7) in the outpatient expectant management cohort. There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Outpatient management of term PROM is associated with longer PROM to delivery intervals, but shorter admission to delivery intervals.
Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/therapy , Labor, Induced , Adult , Cesarean Section , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Linear Models , Multivariate Analysis , Outpatients , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Watchful WaitingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to determine if admission-to-delivery times vary between term nulliparous women with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) who initially receive oxytocin compared with buccal misoprostol for labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort of 130 term, nulliparous women with PROM and cervical dilation of ≤2 cm who underwent induction of labor with intravenous oxytocin or buccal misoprostol. The primary outcome was time from admission to delivery. Linear regressions with log transformation were used to estimate the effect of induction agent on time to delivery. RESULTS: Women receiving oxytocin had faster admission-to-delivery times than women receiving misoprostol (16.9 vs. 19.9 hours, p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the groups. In the adjusted model, women who received misoprostol had a 22% longer time from admission to delivery (95% CI 5.0-42.0%) compared with women receiving oxytocin. CONCLUSION: In term nulliparous patients with PROM, intravenous oxytocin is associated with faster admission-to-delivery times than buccal misoprostol.
Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/therapy , Labor, Induced/methods , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Female , Humans , Labor, Obstetric , Linear Models , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
All cellular proteins are derived from preexisting ones by natural selection. Because of the random nature of this process, many potentially useful protein structures never arose or were discarded during evolution. Here, we used a single round of genetic selection in mouse cells to isolate chemically simple, biologically active transmembrane proteins that do not contain any amino acid sequences from preexisting proteins. We screened a retroviral library expressing hundreds of thousands of proteins consisting of hydrophobic amino acids in random order to isolate four 29-aa proteins that induced focus formation in mouse and human fibroblasts and tumors in mice. These proteins share no amino acid sequences with known cellular or viral proteins, and the simplest of them contains only seven different amino acids. They transformed cells by forming a stable complex with the platelet-derived growth factor ß receptor transmembrane domain and causing ligand-independent receptor activation. We term this approach de novo selection and suggest that it can be used to generate structures and activities not observed in nature, create prototypes for novel research reagents and therapeutics, and provide insight into cell biology, transmembrane protein-protein interactions, and possibly virus evolution and the origin of life.
