Vulvar Buschke-Löwenstein tumor in a HPV 16 infected woman: case report.

The Buschke-Löwenstein tumor is characterized by an exophytic lesion on the perianal region. It is considered benign but there is a high risk of recurrence and degenerative potential. It is commonly associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) especially subtypes 6 and 11, its evolution depends on the host's immunity and the association with other sexually transmitted diseases. Surgical excision is the recommended treatment in most cases. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman with only diabetes history, who had verrucous vulvar lesion associated to HPV subtype 16 treated with large excision.

Office hysteroscopy before first in vitro fertilization. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Implantation failure remains a mystery since decades. This procedure needs a "top quality embryo" and a "normal" uterine cavity. To assess uterine cavity before first in vitro fertilization (IVF), many diagnostic tools could be used. Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard to diagnose and treat intra-uterine anomalies. However, it is not clearly recommanded to offer an office hysteroscopy before first IVF when transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and hysterosalpingography (HSG) were normal. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the role of office hysteroscopy before first IVF when no intra-uterine anomalies are suspected. BASIC PROCEDURES: We conducted a randomized controlled trial including 171 women scheduled for their first IVF. Women were assigned to either Group I: office hysteroscopy before IVF or Group II: immediate IVF. We included women aged less than 40 years, having regular cycles, FSH levels less than10UI/l, antral follicular count ≥12, normal TVUS and HSG. Their body mass index (BMI) ranged from 19 to 30 kg/m2. We excluded patients known having severe endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and oocyte receivers. The primary outcome were livebirth rate and clinical pregnancy rate. MAIN FUNDINGS: Between january 2016 and september 2017, we randomly assigned 171 women to either Group I (n = 84) or Group II (n = 87). Hysteroscopy was done in the mid-follicular phase immediately before IVF. Baseline characteristics and IVF features were comparable between groups except for the IVF protocol. Live birth rate was 23,9% in Group I versus 19,3% in Group II. (p = 0,607). Clinical Pregnancy rate was 32,4% in Group I versus 21,7% in Group II. (p = 0,326). No statistical significance was observed for neither miscarriage rate nor multiple pregnancy rate. Hysteroscopy showed 30% unsuspected intra-uterine anomalies: 11 intra-uterine adhesions, 7 polyps, 7 clinical endometritis and one fibroid print. Therapeutic hysteroscopy was done only for 6 intra-uterine adhesions and 3 polyps. Other anomalies did not require operative hysteroscopy. Visual analog score during hysteroscopy was 4,69 +/-2,892. 5 women (6%) of Group I experienced discomfort during diagnostic hysteroscopy. Only one patient had vagal syncope. No further complications were observed. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: Office hysteroscopy before first IVF seems not improve IVF results. Minimal intra-uterine anomalies not diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography do not seem to reduce IVF results.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) and male infertility: characterization of five new cases, review of the literature, and perspectives.

PURPOSE: To characterize small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in infertile males RESEARCH QUESTION: Are molecular cytogenetic methods still relevant for the identification and characterization of sSMC in the era of next-generation sequencing? METHODS: In this paper, we report five males with oligoasthenozoospermia or azoospermia with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss in partnership in four cases. R-banding karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were performed and showed sSMC in all five cases. Microdissection and reverse-FISH were performed in one case. RESULTS: One sSMC, each, was derived from chromosome 15 and an X-chromosome; two sSMC were derivatives of chromosome 22. The fifth sSMC was a ring chromosome 4 complemented by a deletion of the same region 4p14 to 4p16.1 in one of the normal chromosomes 4. All markers were mosaics except one of sSMC(22). CONCLUSION: Through this study, we emphasize the necessity of a proper combination of high-throughput techniques with conventional cytogenetic and FISH methods. This could provide a personalized diagnostic and accurate results for the patients suffering from infertility or RPL. We also highlight FISH analyses, which are essential tools for detecting sSMC in infertile patients. In fact, despite its entire composition of heterochromatin, sSMC can have effects on spermatogenesis by producing mechanical perturbations during meiosis and increasing meiotic nondisjunction rate. This would contribute to understand the exact chromosomal mechanism disrupting the natural and the assisted reproduction leading to offer a personalized support.