ABSTRACT
One of the significant drawbacks of using zirconium dioxide as a framework for prosthodontic structures is its propensity for breakage. Paradoxically, the higher the optical performance of zirconium dioxide, the more its mechanical durability tends to decrease and vice versa. A detailed analysis of the technological process has uncovered divergent opinions and significant disparities in recommendations concerning the fabrication of zirconium dioxide prosthodontic constructs. There are different recommendations regarding the need for abrasive blasting and regeneration firing. Consequently, conducting an in-depth experimental study on this matter and implementing the resulting findings will significantly contribute to addressing the challenges of prosthodontic rehabilitation for patients utilizing zirconium dioxide.
