Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 52(2): 279-285, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31628565

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the residual cancer rate after cystoprostatectomy (CPT) in patients with a history of radiation therapy for prostate cancer and the postoperative complication rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving 21 patients who had a CPT over 7 years and who had a history of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. To compare results, two additional groups were created: a group of patients without a history of radiotherapy in whom a CPT was performed, and a group without a history of radiotherapy and in whom was accidentally discovered a prostate cancer after CPT on histology specimens. RESULTS: The median age at the time of radiotherapy was 69 years. The median age at the time of cystoprostatectomy was 78 years. The median PSA at the time of the intervention was 0.6 ng/ml in the group with a history of radiotherapy. The residual cancer rate was 24%. No patients had criteria for biological recurrence. There were no additional surgical complications in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.2). The rate of cutaneous ureterostomy was higher (p = 0.0006) due to increased surgical difficulties (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: The residual cancer rate was 24% after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. PSA alone does not appear to be sufficient to detect the persistence of residual prostate cancer after radiotherapy. There were no more surgical complications after prostate radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy , Neoplasm, Residual , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiotherapy , Aged , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Cystectomy/methods , Humans , Male , Needs Assessment , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual/blood , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Neoplasm, Residual/surgery , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Ureterostomy/methods , Ureterostomy/statistics & numerical data
2.
Urology ; 133: 129-134, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31381896

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction. Vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy is a real challenge for reconstructive surgery when facing several endoscopic management failures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a case series of robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction for anastomotic stricture failing endoscopic management. The procedure was performed with an extraperitoneal approach. The fibrotic anastomotic region was resected and a new vesicourethral running suture was performed with well-vascularized tissue. Bladder catheter was removed after 7 days. RESULTS: Six procedures were performed from April 2013 to May 2018 at our department. One patient had a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our department; the 5 others were referred from other institutions after receiving open prostatectomies. Three patients had salvage radiation therapy before reconstruction. Mean age was of 73.8 years (68-82). There was no peroperative complication. Mean operative time was of 108 minutes (60-180)], with a mean estimated blood loss of 130 mL (50-300). After surgery, 3 patients presented recurrences managed endoscopically without recurrence after 3, 5, and 11 months. Three patients presented incontinence treated with artificial sphincter implantation. One patient had no residual symptom after 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction is a safe procedure. It is an option to consider when facing recurring anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy. It is an alternative to the perineal approach and an option before urinary diversion. Patients should be informed of the risks of incontinence and recurrence before surgery especially if they had radiation therapy.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prostatectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urethra/surgery , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomosis, Surgical , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Peritoneum , Retrospective Studies
3.
Urol Ann ; 8(4): 430-433, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28057986

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate a simple and fast technique to ensure negative surgical margins on partial nephrectomies, while correlating margin statuses with the final pathology report. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) with T1-T2 renal tumors from January 2010 to the end of December 2015. Before tumor removal, intraoperative ultrasound (US) localization was performed. After tumor removal and before performing hemostasis of the kidney, the specimens were placed in a saline solution and a US was performed to evaluate if the tumor's capsule were intact, and then compared to the final pathology results. RESULTS: In 177 PN(s) (147 open procedures and 30 laparoscopic procedures) were performed on 147 patients. Arterial clamping was done for 32 patients and the mean warm ischemia time was 19 ± 6 min. The mean US examination time was 41 ± 7 s. The US analysis of surgical margins was negative in 172 cases, positive in four, and in only one case it was not possible to conclude. The final pathology results revealed one false positive surgical margin and one false negative surgical margin, while all other margins were in concert with US results. The mean tumor size was 3.53 ± 1.43 cm, and the mean surgical margin was 2.8 ± 1.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative US control of resection margins in PN is a simple, efficient, and effective method for ensuring negative surgical margins with a small increase in warm ischemia time and can be conducted by the operating urologist.

4.
Ann Transplant ; 19: 569-75, 2014 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25374252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical difficulties of renal transplantation related to prostate cancer (PC) treatment and the results of renal transplantation after radical prostatectomy are currently poorly known, as well as oncological follow-up before and after renal transplantation. MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including all patients diagnosed with PC before renal transplantation in our department. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included between August 2003 and December 2013. The mean age at diagnosis of PC was 61.7 years (range 51.4-71.1). PSA mean level at diagnosis was 8.5 ng/ml (range 4.8-20). Fourteen had a retro-pubic and 5 a laparoscopic prostatectomy. Three patients underwent radiotherapy for positive surgical margins or extra-capsular extension. Fourteen patients were transplanted. The mean time lapse between prostatectomy and kidney transplantation was 32.8 months (range 14-71). Seven recipients (50%) were transplanted less than 24 months after prostatectomy. Post-transplantation surgical complications were not significantly related to dissection difficulties (p=0.2). No recurrence of PC was observed after renal transplantation, with a mean follow-up of 38 months (range 6-77.9). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer discovered before renal transplantation should be treated by radical prostatectomy to assess recurrence risk. If the PC is at low risk of recurrence, it seems possible to shorten the 2-year period of oncologic follow-up before transplantation called for in current recommendations.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...