ABSTRACT
Background: The association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and an increased risk of bronchiectasis, as well as contributing factors, remains unclear. Additionally, whether bronchiectasis increases disease burden in IBD remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to: 1) assess whether IBD increases the risk of incident bronchiectasis; 2) compare the risk of bronchiectasis between individuals with Crohn's disease (CD) and those with ulcerative colitis (UC); 3) identify risk factors for bronchiectasis in individuals with IBD; and 4) examine the disease burden in individuals with IBD and bronchiectasis versus those without. Methods: We conducted a population-based matched cohort study involving adults aged ≥20â years with IBD, using data acquired from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database between 2002 and 2012. Results: During the mean follow-up of 9.6â years, the incidence rate of bronchiectasis was 419.63 out of 100 000 person-years (PY) and 309.65 out of 100 000 PY in the IBD and matched cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.39), respectively. UC was associated with increased bronchiectasis risk (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.69), but CD was not. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that age, male sex, medical aid, underweight status, COPD and diabetes mellitus were associated with an increased risk of bronchiectasis in the IBD cohort (p<0.05). The mortality, emergency department visit and hospitalisation rates were significantly higher for individuals with IBD and bronchiectasis compared with those without bronchiectasis (p<0.05). Conclusion: IBD is associated with increased risk of bronchiectasis, which results in a greater disease burden in individuals with IBD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term post-discontinuation outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-αi) which was then discontinued. METHODS: Sixty Korean patients with RA who participated in a 5-year GO-BEFORE and GO-FORWARD extension trials were included in this retrospective study. Golimumab was deliberately discontinued after the extension study (baseline). Patients were then followed by their rheumatologists. We reviewed their medical records for 2 years (max 28 months) following golimumab discontinuation. Patients were divided into a maintained benefit (MB) group and a loss-of-benefit (LB) group based on treatment pattern after golimumab discontinuation. The LB group included patients whose conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s) were stepped-up or added/switched (SC) and those who restarted biologic therapy (RB). RESULTS: The mean age of patients at baseline was 56.5 years and 55 (91.7%) were females. At the end of follow-up, 23 (38.3%) patients remained in the MB group. In the LB group, 75.7% and 24.3% were assigned into SC and RB subgroups, respectively. Fifty percent of patients lost MB after 23.3 months. Demographics and clinical variables at baseline were comparable between MB and LB groups except for age, C-reactive protein level, and corticosteroid use. Restarting biologic therapy was associated with swollen joint count (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.55) and disease duration (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Treatment strategies after discontinuing TNF-αi are needed to better maintain disease control and quality of life of patients with RA.
