Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Vet Med ; 119(1-2): 21-30, 2015 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25684037

ABSTRACT

Newcastle disease (ND) is an endemic disease in village chickens in Ethiopia with substantial economic importance. The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of a blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA, Svanova Biotech), indirect ELISA (iELISA, Laboratoire Service International) and haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test for ND virus (NDV) antibody detection were evaluated in a Bayesian framework in the absence of a gold standard test, on sera collected from unvaccinated chickens kept under the village production system in household flocks and at markets in two woredas (i.e. districts) of the Eastern Shewa zone, Ethiopia. The outcomes of the iELISA test differed dramatically from those of the two other tests with 92% of the samples testing positive as compared with less than 15% for bELISA and HI. iELISA results were also inconsistent with previous estimations of Newcastle serological prevalence. The information provided by the iELISA test was thus considered as highly unreliable, probably due to an extremely low specificity, and thus not considered in the Bayesian models aiming at estimating serological prevalence and test performance parameters. Bayesian modelling of HI and bELISA test results suggested that bELISA had both the highest Se (86.6%; 95% posterior credible interval (PCI): 61.8%; 98.5%), and the highest Sp (98.3%; 95% PCI: 97.2%; 99.5%), while HI had a Se of 80.2% (95% PCI: 59.1%; 94.3%), and a Sp of 96.1% (95% PCI: 95.1%; 97.4%). Model selection and the range of the posterior distribution of the correlation between bELISA and HI test outcomes for truly seropositive animals (median at 0.461; PCI: -0.055; 0.894) suggested a tendency for bELISA and HI to detect the same truly positive animals and to fail to detect the same truly positive animals. The use of bELISA in screening and surveillance for NDV antibodies is indicated given its high Se and Sp, in addition to its ease of automation to handle large numbers of samples compared to HI. The latter can be used as confirmatory test where an ELISA test with moderate or low specificity is used although the likely positive dependence with bELISA implies that HI and bELISA provide similar information on truly positive animals. Evaluation of commercial ELISAs is indicated before their wider use in village chicken populations to avoid erroneous inferences.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Chickens , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests/veterinary , Newcastle Disease/epidemiology , Newcastle disease virus/immunology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Bayes Theorem , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Newcastle Disease/immunology , Newcastle Disease/virology , Poultry Diseases/immunology , Poultry Diseases/virology , Prevalence , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Poult Sci ; 91(4): 862-9, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22399725

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to estimate the seroprevalence of Newcastle disease (ND), Pasteurella multocida (PM) infection, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) infection, and infectious bursal disease (IBD) and to assess the level of concurrent seropositivity during the dry and wet seasons of the year 2010. In total, 234 and 216 sera were collected during the dry and wet seasons, respectively, from unvaccinated backyard chickens at 4 live poultry markets in 2 woredas (districts) of Eastern Shewa zone, Ethiopia, and were tested using commercial ELISA kits. The overall seroprevalence of ND, PM, MG, and IBD was 5.9, 66.2, 57.7, and 91.9%, respectively, during the dry season, and 6.0, 63.4, 78.7, and 96.3%, respectively, during the wet season. The seroprevalence of MG was higher (P < 0.001) during the wet season than during the dry season and higher (P = 0.002) in Adami-Tulu-Jido-Kombolcha woreda (74%) than in Ada'a woreda (60%). Area and season had no significant effect on the seroprevalence of ND, IBD, and PM, indicating the widespread presence of those pathogens throughout the year in the study area. Of all the chickens tested, 85.6% had antibodies concurrently to more than one of the pathogens investigated. Birds were concurrently seropositive to more diseases during the wet season (median = 3) than during the dry season (median = 2; P = 0.002). As serology is not able to distinguish between strains, further studies are warranted to better understand the circulating strains, their interactions, and their economic effect on backyard poultry production in Ethiopia.


Subject(s)
Birnaviridae Infections/veterinary , Chickens , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Newcastle Disease/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Birnaviridae Infections/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Infectious bursal disease virus/isolation & purification , Mycoplasma/isolation & purification , Mycoplasma Infections/epidemiology , Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Newcastle disease virus/isolation & purification , Pasteurella Infections/epidemiology , Pasteurella Infections/veterinary , Pasteurella multocida/isolation & purification , Seasons , Seroepidemiologic Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...