Prevalence of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy in the Community of Madrid (Spain), estimation with a capture-recapture method.

BACKGROUND: Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) typically presents in young adults as bilateral painless subacute visual loss. Prevalence data are scarce. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of different ascertainment sources used in population-based rare diseases registries to detect cases, and to explore the impact of a capture-recapture method in the estimation of the prevalence of LHON in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (ACM) in 2022. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional population-based study. Potential LHON cases were detected by automatic capture from the healthcare information sources usually explored for the Regional Registry for Rare Diseases (SIERMA). Ophthalmologists provided data from their clinical registry. Positive predictive values (PPV) and sensitivity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Global and by sex prevalences were calculated with confimed cases and with those estimated by the capture-recapture method. RESULTS: A total of 102 potential LHON cases were captured from healthcare information sources, 25 of them (24.5%) finally were confirmed after revision, with an overall PPV of 24.5% (95%CI 17.2-33.7). By source, the electronic clinical records of primary care had the highest PPV (51.2, 95%CI 36.7-65.4). The ophthalmologists clinical registry provided 22 cases, 12 of them not detected in the automatic capture sources. The clinical registry reached a sensitivity of 59.5% (95%CI 43.5-73.6) and the combination of automatic capture sources reached a 67.6% (95%CI: 51.5-80.4). The total confirmed cases were 37, with a mean age of 48.9 years, and a men: women ratio of 2.4:1. Genetic information was recovered in 27 cases, with the m.3460 mutation being the most frequent (12 cases). The global prevalence was 0.55 cases/100,000 inhabitants (95%CI 0.40-0.75), and with the capture-recapture method reached 0.79 cases/100,000 (95%CI 0.60-1.03), a 43.6% higher, 1.15 cases/100,000 (95%CI 0.83-1.58) in men and 0.43 cases/100,000 (95%CI 0.26-0.70) in women. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of LHON estimated in the ACM was lower than in other European countries. Population-based registries of rare diseases require the incorporation of confirmed cases provided by clinicians to asure the best completeness of data. The use of more specific coding for rare diseases in healthcare information systems would facilitate the detection of cases. Further epidemiologic studies are needed to assess potential factors that may influence the penetrance of LHON.

Utilisation of primary healthcare services by Sjögren's syndrome patients in the Community of Madrid and associated factors: a population-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the utilisation of primary health care (PHC) services and factors associated with its use by patients diagnosed with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). METHODS: Population-based cross-sectional cohort of SS patients in Madrid, Spain (SIERMA). Sociodemographic, diagnostic, clinical and PHC service utilisation variables were studied by bivariate analyses and regression models. RESULTS: A total of 4,778 SS patients were included, 65.2% classified as primary SS (pSS), while 34.8% associated with another autoimmune disease (associated SS). Mean age was 64.3 years, and 92.8% of the patients were women. A total of 87.5% used PHC services, with a mean of 19.8 consultations/year. The general practitioner was the most visited health professional, with a mean of 10.9 consultations/year, followed by the nurse, with a mean of 5.7. Characteristics associated with a greater use of PHC services in SS patients were associated SS, higher adjusted morbidity groups (AMG) risk level and older age. Additional factors included symptoms such as dry mouth, fatigue, dry vagina and joint and muscle pain; comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, solid malignant neoplasms, coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and treatments such as sterile saline solution, corticosteroids, opioids and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Most SS patients used PHC services during the study period, and the mean number of consultations was remarkably high. Utilisation was mainly associated with AMG risk level, ageing, glandular and extra-glandular symptoms, substantial comorbidities and various treatments. An optimised design of PHC policies will facilitate early diagnosis, improved management and better quality of life for SS patients.

Prevalence and comorbidities of Sjogren's syndrome patients in the Community of Madrid: A population-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence, sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities of Sjogren's syndrome (SS) patients in the Community of Madrid. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional cohort of SS patients was derived from the information system for rare diseases in the Community of Madrid (SIERMA) and confirmed by a physician. The prevalence per 10,000 inhabitants among people aged ≥18years in June 2015 was calculated. Sociodemographic data and accompanying disorders were recorded. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 4,778 SS patients were confirmed in SIERMA; 92.8% were female, with a mean age of 64.3 (standard deviation=15.4) years. A total of 3,116 (65.2%) patients were classified as primary SS (pSS), and 1,662 (34.8%) as secondary SS (sSS). The prevalence of SS among people aged ≥18 years was 8.4/10,000 (95%Confidence interval [CI]=8.2-8.7). The prevalence of pSS was 5.5/10,000 (95%CI=5.3-5.7), and that of sSS was 2.8/10,000 (95%CI=2.7-2.9), with rheumatoid arthritis (20.3%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (8.5%) being the most prevalent associated autoimmune diseases. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (40.8%), lipid disorders (32.7%), osteoarthritis (27.7%) and depression (21.1%). The most prescribed medications were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (31.9%), topical ophthalmic therapies (31.2%) and corticosteroids (28.0%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SS in the Community of Madrid was similar to the overall prevalence worldwide observed in previous studies. SS was more frequent in women in their sixth decade. Two out of every three SS cases were pSS, while one-third were associated predominantly with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

[Surveillance of rare diseases in Spain: Spanish Registry of Rare Diseases (ReeR).] / Vigilancia de las enfermedades raras en España: el Registro Estatal de Enfermedades Raras (ReeR).

Traditionally, epidemiological surveillance has focused on infectious diseases, but the concept of Public Health surveillance, introduced in Spain with the Law 33/2011, is broader and includes chronic diseases. Health strategies for these diseases need epidemiological information to improve understanding of socio-health needs and to facilitate the efficient management of resources. The European Union defines rare diseases (RD) as those that, being life-threatening or chronically debilitating, have a prevalence of less than 5 cases per 10,000 inhabitants. The RD Strategy of the National Health System, approved in 2009 and updated in 2014, recommends the development of regional registries of rare diseases (RAER), in addition to a national registry. The REpIER and Spain-RDR projects of the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII) promoted the creation and regulation of 94% of the RAER. After more than 10 years of initiatives and work to improve the knowledge of RD's epidemiology in Spain, it was possible to implement the Spanish Registry of Rare Diseases (ReeR) in 2015, becoming one of the first population surveillance systems for chronic diseases of state scope. The ReeR procedures manual is the result of consensus between the RAER, the Ministry of Health, the ISCIII and the patient associations. The participatory methodology used for the implementation and launching of ReeR is considered an added value. The information system implemented will allow improving knowledge about the prevalence and distribution of RD in Spain.

Tradicionalmente la vigilancia epidemiológica se ha centrado en enfermedades transmisibles, pero el concepto de vigilancia en Salud Pública, incorporado en España con la Ley 33/2011, es más amplio e incluye las enfermedades crónicas. Las estrategias de salud para estas enfermedades necesitan disponer de información epidemiológica para mejorar el conocimiento de las necesidades sociosanitarias y facilitar la gestión eficiente de recursos. La Unión Europea define las enfermedades raras (ER) como aquellas que, con peligro de muerte o invalidez crónica, presentan una prevalencia inferior a 5 casos por cada 10.000 habitantes. La Estrategia en ER del Sistema Nacional de Salud, aprobada en 2009 y actualizada en 2014, recomienda desarrollar registros autonómicos de enfermedades raras (RAER) y uno estatal. Los proyectos REpIER y Spain-RDR del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) impulsaron la creación y regulación del 94% de los RAER; y tras más de 10 años de iniciativas y trabajos para mejorar el conocimiento de la epidemiología de las ER en España, se logró implementar el Registro Estatal de Enfermedades Raras (ReeR) en 2015, convirtiéndose en uno de los primeros sistemas de vigilancia poblacional de enfermedades crónicas de ámbito estatal. El manual de procedimientos del ReeR es el resultado del consenso entre los RAER, Ministerio de Sanidad, ISCIII y asociaciones de pacientes. La metodología participativa empleada para la implementación y puesta en funcionamiento del ReeR es considerada un valor añadido. El sistema de información implementado va a permitir mejorar el conocimiento sobre la prevalencia y distribución de las ER en España.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovenous cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation for incompetent saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness, safety, and quality of care afforded by cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) vs existing options in treating great saphenous vein incompetence. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review; used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework; assessed the quality of randomized clinical trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool; and performed a meta-analysis on the available comparative measurements. RESULTS: Three comparative studies, two randomized controlled trials and one observational study comprising 1057 participants, were included for effectiveness assessment purposes. The safety assessment also included 10 case series. Available evidence allowed comparison of CA with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) but not with other treatments. The comparative effectiveness analysis showed that whereas all three treatments reduced disease severity, none was significantly better than any other in terms of effectiveness. In terms of safety, however, CA devices gave rise to fewer adverse events and less severity at 12 months of follow-up than did EVLA or RFA. Other important advantages of CA over EVLA or RFA were linked to quality of care; patients reported less pain during intervention with CA than with RFA or EVLA devices and registered shorter intervention and recovery times. Furthermore, tumescent anesthesia and compression bandages were not necessary, making this technique more comfortable for the patients than endothermal techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EVLA and RFA, CA treatments yield comparable effectiveness outcomes and lead to less frequent and fewer mild adverse events, without difference in major adverse events. Furthermore, CA devices have advantages in terms of quality of care indicators, such as pain during intervention, treatment and recovery times, lower use of anesthesia, and zero use of compression bandages after treatment.

[Detection of adverse events using trigger tools in 2hospital units in Spain]. / Detección de eventos adversos mediante trigger tools en 2unidades de hospitalización de un hospital terciario en España.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AE) related to health care are frequent due to the nature of this activity, and for this reason, it is necessary to develop methods to detect them and prevent their recurrence. One of these methods uses what are called trigger tools, which are markers that allow AE to be identified retrospectively for subsequent analysis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of a trigger tools system to detect AE related to patient safety in Internal Medicine and General Surgery units of a tertiary referral hospital. As secondary objectives, measurements were made of the rate of AE, its prevalence in admissions, as well as a description of the different types of AE, and to evaluate the time spent using this tool. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of patients admitted to the units of Internal Medicine and General Surgery and discharged during 2016. Inclusion criteria were hospital stay over 24h and the presence of a complete clinical record of the studied acute episode. Patients admitted to short-stay units were excluded. A verification questionnaire was designed to registry key study variables and associated AE. RESULTS: The study included 118 patients from Internal Medicine and 115 from General Surgery. The presence of at least one trigger was detected in 86 (72.9%) Internal Medicine and 56 (48.7%) General Surgery patients. Of these, 13 (15.1%) were associated with the presence of an AE in Internal Medicine and 34 (60.7%) in General Surgery. The trigger tool system failed to detect 7 AE, 4 of them in Internal Medicine. The median of triggers identified in each patient was 1.5 (IQR p25-p75: 1-2.5) in Internal Medicine and 2 (IQR p25-p75: 1-4) in General Surgery. In total, 262 positive triggers were detected, of which 157 corresponded to Internal Medicine, most of them related to early emergency re-admission after discharge. Most of the identified AEs required re-hospitalisation or extending the length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Trigger tools systems are useful for the detection and characterisation of AE, which helps to analyse and implement improvement measures.