Nongenic, bidirectional transcription precedes and may promote developmental DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila.

A large number of DNA segments are excised from the chromosomes of the somatic nucleus during development of Tetrahymena thermophila. How these germline-limited sequences are recognized and excised is still poorly understood. We have found that many of these noncoding DNAs are transcribed during nuclear development. Transcription of the germline-limited M element occurs from both DNA strands and results in heterogeneous transcripts of < 200 b to > 1 kb. Transcripts are most abundant when developing micro- and macronuclei begin their differentiation. Transcription is normally restricted to unrearranged DNA of micronuclei and/or developing nuclei, but germline-limited DNAs can induce their own transcription when placed into somatic macronuclei. Brief actinomycin D treatment of conjugating cells blocked M-element excision, providing evidence that transcription is important for efficient DNA rearrangement. We propose that transcription targets these germline-limited sequences for elimination by altering chromatin to ensure their accessibility to the excision machinery.

Flanking regulatory sequences of the Tetrahymena R deletion element determine the boundaries of DNA rearrangement.

In the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, thousands of DNA segments of variable size are eliminated from the developing somatic macronucleus by specific DNA rearrangements. It is unclear whether rearrangement of the many different DNA elements occurs via a single mechanism or via multiple rearrangement systems. In this study, we characterized in vivo cis-acting sequences required for the rearrangement of the 1.1-kbp R deletion element. We found that rearrangement requires specific sequences flanking each side of the deletion element. The required sequences on the left side appear to span roughly a 70-bp region that is located at least 30 bp from the rearrangement boundary. When we moved the location of the left cis-acting sequences closer to the eliminated region, we observed a rightward shift of the rearrangement boundary such that the newly formed deletion junction retained its original distance from this flanking region. Likewise, when we moved the flanking region as much as 500 bp away from the deletion element, the rearrangement boundary shifted to remain in relative juxtaposition. Clusters of base substitutions made throughout this critical flanking region did not affect rearrangement efficiency or accuracy, which suggests a complex nature for this regulatory sequence. We also found that the right flanking region effectively replaced the essential sequences identified on the left side, and thus, the two flanking regions contain sequences of analogous function despite the lack of obvious sequence identity. These data taken together indicate that the R-element flanking regions contain sequences that position the rearrangement boundaries from a short distance away. Previously, a 10-bp polypurine tract flanking the M-deletion element was demonstrated to act from a distance to determine its rearrangement boundaries. No apparent sequence similarity exists between the M and R elements. The functional similarity between these different cis-acting sequences of the two elements is firm support for a common mechanism controlling Tetrahymena rearrangement.

Non-Mendelian, heritable blocks to DNA rearrangement are induced by loading the somatic nucleus of Tetrahymena thermophila with germ line-limited DNA.

Site-specific DNA deletion occurs at thousands of sites within the genome during macronuclear development of Tetrahymena thermophila. These deletion elements are usually not detected in macronuclear chromosomes. We have interfered with the normal deletion of two of these elements, the adjacent M and R elements, by loading vegetative macronuclei with these elements prior to sexual conjugation. Transformed cell lines containing the exogenous M or R element, carried on high-copy-number vectors containing genes encoding rRNA within parental (old) macronuclei, consistently failed to excise chromosomal copies of the M or R element during formation of new macronuclei. Little or no interference with the deletions of adjacent elements or of unlinked elements was observed. The micronucleus (germ line)-limited region of each element was sufficient to inhibit specific DNA deletion. This interference with DNA deletion usually is manifested as a cytoplasmic dominant trait: deletion elements present in the old macronucleus of one partner of a mating pair were sufficient to inhibit deletion occurring in the other partner. Remarkably, the failure to excise these elements became a non-Mendelian, inheritable trait in the next generation and did not require the high copy number of exogenously introduced elements. The introduction of exogenous deletion elements into parental macronuclei provides us with an epigenetic means to establish a heritable pattern of DNA rearrangement.

Genome downsizing during ciliate development: nuclear division of labor through chromosome restructuring.

The ciliated protozoa divide the labor of germline and somatic genetic functions between two distinct nuclei. The development of the somatic (macro-) nucleus from the germinal (micro-) nucleus occurs during sexual reproduction and involves large-scale, genetic reorganization including site-specific chromosome breakage and DNA deletion. This intriguing process has been extensively studied in Tetrahymena thermophila. Characterization of cis-acting sequences, putative protein factors, and possible reaction intermediates has begun to shed light on the underlying mechanisms of genome rearrangement. This article summarizes the current understanding of this phenomenon and discusses its origin and biological function. We postulate that ciliate nuclear restructuring serves to segregate the two essential functions of chromosomes: the transmission and expression of genetic information.

Sites of RNA polymerase III transcription initiation and Ty3 integration at the U6 gene are positioned by the TATA box.

The function of a TATA element in RNA polymerase (EC 2.7.7.6) III transcription of a naturally TATA-containing U6 snRNA gene and a naturally TATA-less tRNA gene was probed by transcription and Ty3 transposition analyses. Deletion of the TATA box from a U6 minigene did not abolish transcription and Ty3 integration but changed the positions of initiation and insertion. Insertion of the U6 TATA box at three positions upstream of the TATA-less SUP2 tRNA(Tyr) gene resulted in novel transcription initiation and Ty3 integration patterns that depended upon position of the insertion. Nevertheless, the predominant tRNA gene initiation sites were not affected by insertion of the TATA sequence and remained at a fixed distance from the internal box A promoter element. Insertions of the TATA box upstream of a SUP2 box A mutant affected the level of transcription and restricted the use of upstream start sites, but they neither enhanced the use of TATA-dependent initiation sites nor restored expression to the level of the wild-type gene. We conclude that (i) the U6 TATA box is essential in vivo for correct initiation but not for transcription, (ii) a TATA box does not compensate for a weak box A sequence and so cannot perform equivalently, and (iii) the TATA-binding protein, and probably components of transcription factor IIIB, are present on the target at the time of Ty3 integration.

Ty3 GAG3 and POL3 genes encode the components of intracellular particles.

Ty3 is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae retrotransposon that integrates near the transcription initiation sites of polymerase III-transcribed genes. It is distinct from the copialike Ty1 and Ty2 retrotransposons of S. cerevisiae in both the sequences of encoded proteins and gene order. It is a member of the gypsylike family of retrotransposons which resemble animal retroviruses. This study was undertaken to investigate the nucleocapsid particle of a transpositionally active gypsylike retrotransposon. Characterization of extracts from cells in which Ty3 expression was induced showed the presence of Ty3 nucleoprotein complexes, or viruslike particles, that migrated on linear sucrose gradients with a size of 156S. These particles are composed of Ty3 RNA, full-length, linear DNA, and proteins. In this study, antibodies raised against peptides predicted from the Ty3 sequence were used to identify Ty3-encoded proteins. These include the capsid (26 kDa), nucleocapsid (9 kDa), and reverse transcriptase (55 kDa) proteins. Ty3 integrase proteins of 61 and 58 kDa were identified previously (L. J. Hansen and S. B. Sandmeyer, J. Virol. 64:2599-2607, 1990). Reverse transcriptase activity associated with the particles was measured by using exogenous and endogenous primer-templates. Immunofluorescence studies of cells overexpressing Ty3 revealed cytoplasmic clusters of immunoreactive proteins. Transmission electron microscopy showed that Ty3 viruslike particles are about 50 nm in diameter. Thus, despite the unusual position specificity of Ty3 upstream of tRNA-coding regions, aspects of the Ty3 life cycle are fundamentally similar to those of retroviruses.

Ty3 integrates within the region of RNA polymerase III transcription initiation.

Over 190 independent insertions into target plasmids of the retrovirus-like element Ty3 were recovered and mapped. Ty3 was shown to insert upstream of tRNA, 5S, and U6 genes, all of which are transcribed by RNA polymerase III. Integration sites were within 1-4 nucleotides of the position of transcription initiation, even for one mutant gene where the polymerase III initiation site was shifted to a completely new context. Mutagenesis of a SUP2 tRNA gene target showed that integration required functional promoter elements but that it did not correlate in a simple way with target transcription. This is the first report directly linking a discrete genomic function with preferential insertion of a retrotransposon.

Transfer RNA genes are genomic targets for de Novo transposition of the yeast retrotransposon Ty3.

Insertions of the yeast element Ty3 resulting from induced retrotransposition were characterized in order to identify the genomic targets of transposition. The DNA sequences of the junctions between Ty3 and flanking DNA were determined for two insertions of an unmarked element. Each insertion was at position -17 from the 5' end of a tRNA-coding sequence. Ninety-one independent insertions of a marked Ty3 element were studied by Southern blot analysis. Pairs of independent insertions into seven genomic loci accounted for 14 of these insertions. The DNA sequence flanking the insertion site was determined for at least one member of each pair of integrated elements. In each case, insertion was at position -16 or -17 relative to the 5' end of one of seven different tRNA genes. This proportion of genomic loci used twice for Ty3 integration is consistent with that predicted by a Poisson distribution for a number of genomic targets roughly equivalent to the estimated number of yeast tRNA genes. In addition, insertions upstream of the same tRNA gene in one case were at different positions, but in all cases were in the same orientation. Thus, genomic insertions of Ty3 in a particular orientation are apparently specified by the target, while the actual position of the insertion relative to the tRNA-coding sequence can vary slightly.

Integration specificity of retrotransposons and retroviruses.

Analysis of in vivo integration patterns has provided no data to support the notion that retroelement integration is random. Rather, the diversity of insertion patterns of retroelements suggests numerous ways in which genomic DNA is identified for preferential targeting. These range from specific to general and include sequence content, removal of chromatin proteins, nuclear localization, distinctive topology, and association with particular trans-acting factors. Many are similar to mechanisms already demonstrated to affect activities of previously described recombinases. Moreover, such proposed targeting mechanisms could act directly or indirectly to influence integration site selection. A variety of observations are consistent with the preferential use of open chromatin for retroelement insertion. The site-specific retroelements insert into transcribed regions. In vitro studies with retroviruses and Ty1 have shown that naked DNA can function, at least under some conditions, as a target. The association of integration sites of retroviruses and regions in which DNase I hypersensitive sites exist and the preferential integration of Ty1 at the 5' ends of some genes might suggest that regions which do not have phased nucleosomes are targets for integration. Is targeting to transcriptionally active regions essentially passive, because they are not densely associated with chromatin proteins, or is targeting active in the sense of being a more specific process? Specific targets could be generated from DNA or protein motifs. Nucleosome-free regions are associated with a variety of nonnucleosome proteins, including topoisomerases, nuclear matrix proteins, transcription factors, or replication proteins. These then are candidates for proteins which target integration directly, by associating with the transposition complex or, indirectly, by inducing changes in the DNA. Polymerase III-transcribed genes, which are relatively defined targets of integration for some retrotransposon systems, probably exemplify several of these mechanisms. Promoter sequences may be directly involved in targeting some elements and positioning of the transcription complex may fix the integration sites of others. The most common sequence feature of characterized in vivo insertion sites is that they are AT-rich. This may reflect specificity of the IN protein, particularly the gypsylike elements, increased nicking of DNA, which is relatively weakly base-paired, as appears to be the case for the FLP recombinase (130), or simply the AT content of accessible regions in chromatin. Some of these questions will be resolved by the characterization of in vitro integration sites that have been recovered by physical means, rather than by biological assay. The insertion patterns of a number of retroposons suggest that retroelements can insert with a high degree of sequence specificity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Ty3, a yeast retrotransposon associated with tRNA genes, has homology to animal retroviruses.

Ty3, a retrotransposon of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is found within 20 base pairs (bp) of the 5' ends of different tRNA genes. Determination of the complete nucleotide sequence of one Ty3 retrotransposon (Ty3-2) shows that the element is composed of an internal domain 4,748 bp long flanked by long terminal repeats of the 340-bp sigma element. Three open reading frames (ORFs) longer than 100 codons are present in the sense strand. The first ORF, TYA3, encodes a protein with a motif found in the nucleic acid-binding protein of retroviruses. The second ORF, TYB3, has homology to retroviral pol genes. The deduced amino acid sequence of the reverse transcriptase domain shows the greatest similarity to Drosophila retrotransposon 17.6, with 43% identical residues. The inferred order of functional domains within TYB3--protease, reverse transcriptase, and endonuclease--resembles the order in Drosophila element 17.6 and in animal retroviruses but is different from that found in yeast elements Ty1 and Ty2. A second Ty3 element (Ty3-1) from a standard laboratory strain was overexpressed and shown to transpose.