Italian translation and validation of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8).

PURPOSE: To translate and validate an Italian version of the CLDEQ-8 (CLDEQ-8_IT). METHODS: The study was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, a cross-cultural adaptation of CLDEQ-8 to Italian was performed by forward and backward translation in sequence. In the second phase, a multi-centre study was conducted for the validation of the questionnaire. Validity CLDEQ-8_IT was evaluated against three gestalt questions: overall opinion of soft contact lenses (CLs), global self-assessments of eye sensitivity and eye dryness. Reliability was evaluated by test-retest assessment in a subgroup of subjects. Finally, the psychometric properties of CLDEQ-8_IT were explored by Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty soft CL wearers, fluent Italian speakers (73 males and 167 females), between 18 and 70 years of age were enrolled. A significant correlation was found between CLDEQ-8_IT and each of the three Gestalt questions. The cutoff score of 12 points demonstrated the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in differentiating wearers grading their CLs as "Excellent/Very good" from those reporting their overall opinion as "Good/Fair/Poor". The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between test and retest was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92). Finally, infit and outfit statistics using Rasch analysis for the 8 items were in a good range, however Principal Components Analysis revealed a certain degree of multi-dimensionality of the instrument. Also, item 8 analysis could be computed after merging the last two response categories. CONCLUSION: The CLDEQ-8_IT showed very good validity and reliability in measuring symptoms of CL wearers, comparable to the original English language version. A cut-off of 12 was confirmed as yielding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in detecting CL wearers who could benefit from clinical management of their CL-related symptoms. Collapsing of the response options 5 and 6 in the last item of questionnaire could optimise its functioning.

Factors influencing the 8-item contact lens dry eye questionnaire score and comparison of translations in Japanese soft contact lens wearers.

PURPOSE: To determine (1) the factors associated with a high degree of self-reported symptoms with Japanese translations of the 8-Item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (J-CLDEQ-8) in a cross-section of soft contact lens (SCL) wearers in Japan and (2) whether the difference in translation of the CLDEQ-8 affects the scores between validated and non-validated versions of the Japanese translation. METHODS: Habitual SCL wearers completed the validated J-CLDEQ-8 and a previous non-validated version. Demographics and SCL history questions were queried when they presented for routine eye care in nine geographically distinct clinics across Japan. The following risk factors for high J-CLDEQ-8 scores (≥11) were tested: sex, age, SCL replacement (daily disposable vs. bi-weekly and monthly reusable), years of SCL wear, and self-reported use of rewetting drops. The scores of the validated and non-validated questionnaires were compared. RESULTS: Significant patient-related risk factors for high J-CLDEQ-8 scores were female sex, use of reusable SCLs, longer years of SCL wear, and use of rewetting drops. Scores for six out of eight questions in the validated J-CLDEQ-8 were significantly higher than those of the non-validated version, resulting in a significant difference in the average total score between the two questionnaires (validated J-CLDEQ-8: 10.5 ± 5.9 vs non-validated J-CLDEQ-8: 9.5 ± 5.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex, use of reusable SCLs, longer years of SCL wear, and use of rewetting drops were significant risk factors for high J-CLDEQ-8 scores in a cross-sectional clinical population of Japanese SCL wearers. Symptoms with SCL are not predicted by age and must therefore be queried at follow-up visits for all SCL wearers. Differences in the two translations affected the ability of the questionnaire to identify individuals with high symptoms associated with SCL wear.

CLEAR - Contact lens complications.

Contact lens-related complications are common, affecting around one third of wearers, although most are mild and easily managed. Contact lenses have well-defined anatomical and physiological effects on the ocular surface and can result in other consequences due to the presence of a biologically active material. A contact lens interacts with the tear film, ocular surface, skin, endogenous and environmental microorganisms, components of care solutions and other antigens which may result in disease specific to contact lens wear, such as metabolic or hypersensitivity disorders. Contact lens wear may also modify the epidemiology or pathophysiology of recognised conditions, such as papillary conjunctivitis or microbial keratitis. Wearers may also present with intercurrent disease, meaning concomitant or pre-existing conditions unrelated to contact lens wear, such as allergic eye disease or blepharitis, which may complicate the diagnosis and management of contact lens-related disease. Complications can be grouped into corneal infection (microbial keratitis), corneal inflammation (sterile keratitis), metabolic conditions (epithelial: microcysts, vacuoles, bullae, tight lens syndrome, epithelial oedema; stromal: superficial and deep neovascularisation, stromal oedema [striae/folds], endothelial: blebs, polymegethism/ pleomorphism), mechanical (corneal abrasion, corneal erosion, lens binding, warpage/refractive error changes; superior epithelial arcuate lesion, mucin balls, conjunctival epithelial flaps, ptosis, discomfort), toxic and allergic disorders (papillary conjunctivitis, solution-induced corneal staining, incomplete neutralisation of peroxide, Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency), tear resurfacing disorders/dry eye (contact lens-induced dry eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction, lid wiper epitheliopathy, lid parallel conjunctival folds, inferior closure stain, 3 and 9 o'clock stain, dellen, dimple veil) or contact lens discomfort. This report summarises the best available evidence for the classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, management and prevention of contact lens-related complications in addition to presenting strategies for optimising contact lens wear.

American Academy of Optometry Microbial Keratitis Think Tank.

SIGNIFICANCE: Think Tank 2019 affirmed that the rate of infection associated with contact lenses has not changed in several decades. Also, there is a trend toward more serious infections associated with Acanthamoeba and fungi. The growing use of contact lenses in children demands our attention with surveillance and case-control studies. PURPOSE: The American Academy of Optometry (AAO) gathered researchers and key opinion leaders from around the world to discuss contact lens-associated microbial keratitis at the 2019 AAO Annual Meeting. METHODS: Experts presented within four sessions. Session 1 covered the epidemiology of microbial keratitis, pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the role of lens care systems and storage cases in corneal disease. Session 2 covered nonbacterial forms of keratitis in contact lens wearers. Session 3 covered future needs, challenges, and research questions in relation to microbial keratitis in youth and myopia control, microbiome, antimicrobial surfaces, and genetic susceptibility. Session 4 covered compliance and communication imperatives. RESULTS: The absolute rate of microbial keratitis has remained very consistent for three decades despite new technologies, and extended wear significantly increases the risk. Improved oxygen delivery afforded by silicone hydrogel lenses has not impacted the rates, and although the introduction of daily disposable lenses has minimized the risk of severe disease, there is no consistent evidence that they have altered the overall rate of microbial keratitis. Overnight orthokeratology lenses may increase the risk of microbial keratitis, especially secondary to Acanthamoeba, in children. Compliance remains a concern and a significant risk factor for disease. New insights into host microbiome and genetic susceptibility may uncover new theories. More studies such as case-control designs suited for rare diseases and registries are needed. CONCLUSIONS: The first annual AAO Think Tank acknowledged that the risk of microbial keratitis has not decreased over decades, despite innovation. Important questions and research directions remain.

Adverse event rates in the retrospective cohort study of safety of paediatric soft contact lens wear: the ReCSS study.

PURPOSE: To ascertain the safety of soft contact lens (SCL) wear in children through a retrospective chart review including real-world clinical practice settings. METHODS: The study reviewed clinical charts from 963 children: 782 patients in 7 US eye care clinics and 181 subjects from 2 international randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Subjects were first fitted while 8-12 years old with various SCL designs, prescriptions and replacement schedules, and observed through to age 16. Clinical records from visits with potential adverse events (AEs) were electronically scanned and reviewed to consensus by an Adjudication Panel. RESULTS: The study encompassed 2713 years-of-wear and 4611 contact lens visits. The cohort was 46% male, 60% were first fitted with daily disposable SCLs, the average age at first fitting was 10.5 years old, with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.5 years-of-wear of follow-up observed. There were 122 potential ocular AEs observed from 118/963 (12.2%) subjects; the annualised rate of non-infectious inflammatory AEs was 0.66%/year (95% CI 0.39-1.05) and 0.48%/year (0.25-0.82) for contact lens papillary conjunctivitis. After adjudication, two presumed or probable microbial keratitis (MK) cases were identified, a rate of 7.4/10 000 years-of-wear (95% CI 1.8-29.6). Both were in teenage boys and one resulted in a small scar without loss of visual acuity. CONCLUSION: This study estimated the MK rate and the rate of other inflammatory AEs in a cohort of SCL wearers from 8 through to 16 years of age. Both rates are comparable to established rates among adults wearing SCLs.

Thirty years of 'quiet eye' with etafilcon A contact lenses.

Frequent replacement contact lenses made from the etafilcon A hydrogel lens material were introduced onto the market over 30 years ago, and etafilcon A remains the most widely used hydrogel lens material today. Although the prescribing of silicone hydrogel lenses is increasing, millions of lens wearers globally have been wearing hydrogel lenses for many years and exhibit a physiologically-stable 'quiet eye', with a low profile of adverse events. Hydrogel lenses are demonstrated to maintain a low inflammatory response and infection risk profile during daily wear, which in the case of etafilcon A, may be related to its low modulus, and the naturally-protective, anti-microbial, non-denatured lysozyme absorbed into the lens from the tear fluid. Although improved corneal physiology from decreased hypoxia with silicone hydrogel lenses is well accepted, equivalent levels of corneal oxygenation are maintained during daily wear of low to medium powered hydrogel lenses, which do not impede the daily corneal de-swelling process, and do not induce clinically significant changes in ocular health. Therefore, hydrogel lenses remain an important alternative for daily wear in modern contact lens practice.

Translation and validation of the 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) among Japanese soft contact lens wearers: The J-CLDEQ-8.

PURPOSE: To translate and validate a Japanese version of the 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) among a multicenter sample of Japanese-speaking soft contact lens (SCL) wearers in Japan. METHODS: The study comprised two phases, 1) forward and backward translation of the CLDEQ-8 into Japanese, 2) cross-sectional validation of Japanese CLDEQ-8 (J-CLDEQ-8) among Japanese spherical disposable SCL wearers (daily disposable, 2 week, or monthly disposable) against their Overall Opinion of SCLs, and 3) repeatability testing in a subset of subjects. RESULTS: 300 subjects (118 males and 182 females) completed the J-CLDEQ-8 and anchoring Gestalt SCL questions. The J-CLDEQ-8 had a strong significant linear relationship to Overall Opinion of SCLs and the Self-Assessment of Eye Dryness. The Gestalt Eye Sensitivity question did not translate well in Japanese and the relationship between it and the J-CLDEQ-8 was not linear. A cutoff score of <11 points with the J-CLDEQ-8 related best to patients who reported "Excellent" or "Very Good" Overall Opinion of their SCLs, differing slightly from the North American CLDEQ-8 cutoff of <12 points. This <11 points cutoff yielded accuracy of 0.66, and a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.66, very similar to the values for the original CLDEQ-8. CONCLUSIONS: The J-CLDEQ-8 was capable of differentiating SCL wearers with different Overall Opinions of their SCLs, comparable to the original CLDEQ-8 in English.

Review and analysis of grading scales for ocular surface staining.

Vital dye staining has been used for over a century to assess the severity of ocular surface disease. However, despite common usage, a universally accepted "gold standard" grading scale does not exist for corneal and conjunctival staining, which can impact the ability to diagnose and monitor ocular surface conditions such as dry eye. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other international regulatory agencies rely on ocular surface staining as a primary endpoint for new drug approvals, so that absence of a "gold standard" scale may affect approval of new drug treatments. To begin to address this problem, we review existing, published grading scales in an integrated fashion, highlighting their differences and similarities to emphasize common themes and the methods and elements that are important in creating a standardized scale. Our goal is to aid the field in moving towards an accepted standardized grading scale for ocular surface staining that can be applied in clinic and research settings for a variety of ocular conditions.

The Case for Using Hydrogen Peroxide Contact Lens Care Solutions: A Review.

Despite their established disinfection and safety benefits, the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) lens care systems among today's wearers of reusable contact lenses remains low in comparison with multipurpose solution (MPS) use. Multipurpose solution systems, however, present several potential drawbacks that may impact patient outcomes, including the use of chemical preservatives for disinfection, biocompatibility issues, and challenges with respect to lens care compliance. Given their unique composition and mechanism of action, one-step H2O2 systems offer the opportunity to avoid many of the challenges associated with MPS use. This article reviews the evolution of H2O2 lens care systems and examines the current scientific and clinical evidence regarding the relative ease of use, lens and tissue compatibility, disinfection efficacy, and ocular surface safety of H2O2 systems. Evaluation of the available data indicates that in comparison with MPS, one-step H2O2 systems tend to promote more favorable compliance, efficacy, comfort, and ocular surface outcomes for a wide range of contact lens-wearing patients. Based on the current published evidence, the authors recommend that eye care practitioners consider making one-step H2O2 systems their first-line contact lens care recommendation for most wearers of reusable lenses.

Comparison of white and blue light assessment of the upper and lower palpebral conjunctiva.

PURPOSE: To compare upper and lower eyelids in terms of palpebral redness, and roughness under two lighting conditions, and assess the extent of association between redness and roughness. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at The Netherlands Contact Lens Congress (2016). The palpebral conjunctivae of the right, upper and lower eyelids of 250 subjects were assessed using a slit-lamp biomicroscope. White light was used to assess palpebral redness and roughness. Roughness was also assessed using cobalt blue light and fluorescein. A 5-point grading scale was used to grade the conditions. The average and maximum grades of 5 zones for the upper, and 3 zones for the lower eyelid were used in the non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: A significantly higher grading in palpebral roughness was found using fluorescein with blue light, compared to using white light, for both upper and lower eyelids (p < 0.001). Upper eyelids appeared significantly rougher than lower eyelids with white and blue light (p < 0.001). Correlations between redness and roughness for upper and lower eyelids were low to moderate (p = <0.001). CONCLUSION: Palpebral roughness was scored more highly with blue, than white light, therefore these methods should not be used interchangeably. Also, roughness was more apparent in the upper eyelid, therefore eyelids should be assessed separately. Palpebral redness and roughness should be considered independent variables due to the low to moderate correlation between them. It is therefore recommended to first assess both eyelids first for redness using white light, followed by examination with fluorescein and blue light to assess roughness.

Multicenter Testing of a Risk Assessment Survey for Soft Contact Lens Wearers With Adverse Events: A Contact Lens Assessment in Youth Study.

PURPOSE: To test the ability of responses to the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS) to differentiate behaviors among participants with serious and significant (S&S) contact lens-related corneal inflammatory events, those with other events (non-S&S), and healthy controls matched for age, gender, and soft contact lens (SCL) wear frequency. METHODS: The CLRS was self-administered electronically to SCL wearers presenting for acute clinical care at 11 clinical sites. Each participant completed the CLRS before their examination. The clinician, masked to CLRS responses, submitted a diagnosis for each participant that was used to classify the event as S&S or non-S&S. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare responses. RESULTS: Comparison of responses from 96 participants with S&S, 68 with non-S&S, and 207 controls showed that patients with S&S were more likely (always or fairly often) to report overnight wear versus patients with non-S&S (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-18.7) and versus controls (aOR, 5.8; CI, 2.2-15.2). Patients with S&S were more likely to purchase SCLs on the internet versus non-S&S (aOR, 4.9; CI, 1.6-15.1) and versus controls (aOR, 2.8; CI, 1.4-5.9). The use of two-week replacement lenses compared with daily disposables was significantly higher among patients with S&S than those with non-S&S (aOR, 4.3; CI, 1.5-12.0). Patients with S&S were less likely to regularly discard leftover solution compared with controls (aOR, 2.5; CI, 1.1-5.6). CONCLUSIONS: The CLRS is a clinical survey tool that can be used to identify risky behaviors and exposures directly associated with an increased risk of S&S events.

TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report.

The role of the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) II Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee was 1) to identify tests used to diagnose and monitor dry eye disease (DED), 2) to identify those most appropriate to fulfil the definition of DED and its sub-classifications, 3) to propose the most appropriate order and technique to conduct these tests in a clinical setting, and 4) to provide a differential diagnosis for DED and distinguish conditions where DED is a comorbidity. Prior to diagnosis, it is important to exclude conditions that can mimic DED with the aid of triaging questions. Symptom screening with the DEQ-5 or OSDI confirms that a patient might have DED and triggers the conduct of diagnostic tests of (ideally non-invasive) breakup time, osmolarity and ocular surface staining with fluorescein and lissamine green (observing the cornea, conjunctiva and eyelid margin). Meibomian gland dysfunction, lipid thickness/dynamics and tear volume assessment and their severity allow sub-classification of DED (as predominantly evaporative or aqueous deficient) which informs the management of DED. Videos of these diagnostic and sub-classification techniques are available on the TFOS website. It is envisaged that the identification of the key tests to diagnose and monitor DED and its sub-classifications will inform future epidemiological studies and management clinical trials, improving comparability, and enabling identification of the sub-classification of DED in which different management strategies are most efficacious.

Water Exposure is a Common Risk Behavior Among Soft and Gas-Permeable Contact Lens Wearers.

PURPOSE: To understand soft contact lens (SCL) and gas-permeable (GP) lens wearers' behaviors and knowledge regarding exposure of lenses to water. METHODS: The Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS) and health behavior questions were completed online by a convenience sample of 1056 SCL and 85 GP lens wearers aged 20 to 76 years. Participants were asked about exposing their lenses to water and their understanding of risks associated with these behaviors. Chi-square analyses examined relationships between patient behaviors and perceptions. RESULTS: GP lens wearers were more likely than SCL wearers to ever rinse or store lenses in water (rinsing: 91% GP, 31% SCL, P < 0.001; storing: 33% GP, 15% SCL P < 0.001). Among SCL wearers, men were more likely to store (24% vs. 13%, P = 0.003) or rinse (41% vs. 29%, P = 0.012) their lenses in water. Showering while wearing lenses was more common in SCL wearers (86%) than GP lens wearers (67%) (P < 0.0001). Swimming while wearing lenses was reported by 62% of SCL wearers and 48% of GP lens wearers (P = 0.027). Wearers who rinsed (SCL; P < 0.0001, GP; P = 0.11) or stored lenses in water (SCL; P < 0.0001, GP P = 0.007) reported that this behavior had little or no effect on their infection risk, compared with those who did not. Both SCL (P < 0.0001) and GP lens wearers (P < 0.0001) perceived that distilled water was safer than tap water for storing or rinsing lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previously published evidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis' association with water exposure, most SCL, and nearly all GP lens wearers, regularly expose their lenses to water, with many unaware of the risk.

Patient-Reported Wearing Experience From Hydrogel Daily Disposable Wearers Older Than 40 Years From the TEMPO Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the patient-reported wearing experience over time among wearers of hydrogel daily disposable (HydDD) contact lenses (CLs) in the TruEye and Moist Performance Overview (TEMPO) Registry (NCT01467557). METHODS: Registered wearers older than 40 years who were recently fit with 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST HydDDs completed self-administered questionnaires four times during a year-long Registry. Overall opinion of CLs, replacement schedules, Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8), and compliance were queried. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and signed rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 86 subjects (24% men, age 50.2±7.1 years) completed the Registry. Approximately 76% were new to daily disposable lenses, and 8% were neophytes. Overall opinion of CLs improved significantly after refitting with HydDDs (baseline 57% excellent/very good vs. 69%-79% at follow-ups, P<0.05 all vs. baseline). Changing to HydDDs maintained average and comfortable wear time (P>0.05), and it did significantly improve CLDEQ-8 scores at all follow-ups (baseline, 11.2±7.3 vs. 2 weeks, 7.8±5.8, P<0.0001; 4 months, 8.6±6.5, P=0.0006; 12 months, 9.3±6.5, P=0.01). Self-assessment of compliance was excellent/very good for 80% at baseline, and improved to 92% to 98% at follow-ups (P<0.0001). More than 90% never slept in their HydDDs, although compliance to daily replacement diminished from 2-week to 4-month surveys (93% vs. 84%, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: After refitting with HydDDs, older wearers reported significantly higher overall opinions of their lenses, better CLDEQ-8 symptom scores, and most were compliant with proper daily disposable lens use. Diminishing daily replacement rates from 2 weeks to 4 months indicate a need to reinforce that recommendation. Wearers of HydDD CLs older than 40 years experienced many benefits from refitting with these daily disposable lenses.

Characterizing Contact Lens-Related Corneal Infiltrates: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To document the time course and resolution of contact lens-related corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) comparing slit-lamp images with anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images. METHODS: Six silicone hydrogel (SiHy) soft contact lens (SCL) wearers presenting with newly diagnosed symptomatic CIEs were monitored with slit-lamp images, detailed drawings, and AS-OCT until the resolution of the CIE. A final follow-up visit was completed 4 weeks after CIE resolution to determine whether scar formation was present. Positive controls were 2 SiHy SCL wearers with established (inactive) corneal scars, and negative controls were 2 SiHy SCL wearers with clear corneas. High- and low-contrast logMAR visual acuities were measured, and subjective symptom questionnaires were completed at all visits. RESULTS: Clinical signs, vision, and symptoms improved in tandem with the resolution of the CIEs as measured by imaging methods. Calibrated measures of infiltrate width from a slit-lamp biomicroscope appear to be similar to calibrated images from AS-OCT. CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies are needed to develop standardized procedures, AS-OCT can be a useful tool to characterize the development, progression, and resolution of corneal infiltrates as an objective measure of resolution and scar formation.

Is purchasing lenses from the prescriber associated with better habits among soft contact lens wearers?

PURPOSE: To compare the habits of United States (US) soft contact lens (SCL) wearers who bought SCLs from their eye care practitioner (ECP), on the internet/telephone, or at retail (not where they were examined) to test the effect of proximity to the prescriber on SCL wear and care practices. METHODS: Adult SCL wearers completed an adapted Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS) online that queried items related to risk factors for SCL-related complications. Responses from subjects who purchased at the ECP, via the internet/telephone, or at a retail store were compared (Chi-Square). RESULTS: Purchase sources were: ECP 646 (67%, 44±12 yrs, 17% male), Retail 104 (11%, 45±13 yrs, 28% male), and Internet/telephone 218 (23%, 45±12 yrs, 18% male); age (p=0.51), gender (p=0.021). Internet purchasers had fewer annual eye exams (79% ECP, 83% retail, 66% internet/telephone, p=0.007), purchased more hydrogel SCLs (34% ECP, 29% retail, 45% internet/telephone, p=0.0034), and paid for SCLs with insurance less often (39% ECP, 29% retail, 19% internet/telephone, p<0.0001). Other behaviors were similar across groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, the purchase location of SCL wearers had limited impact on known risk factors for SCL-related complications. Internet purchasers reported less frequent eye exams and were more likely to be wearing hydrogel SCLs. Closer access to the ECP through in-office SCL purchase did not improve SCL habits or reduce the prevalence of risk behaviors.

Soft Contact Lens-Related Symptoms in North America and the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To characterize and compare the prevalence of soft contact lens-related (SCL) dryness symptoms in large populations of SCL wearers in North America (NAm) and the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: SCL wearers from NAm (n = 1443) and UK (n = 932) sites completed self-administered questionnaires on SCL symptoms and wearing experiences. A categorization for contact lens-related dry eye (CL-DE) was applied that combined Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ) items on dryness frequency and intensity at the end of the day (CL-DE+ = constantly/frequently/sometimes plus intensity = 3-5, and CL-DE- = never/rarely plus intensity = 0-1, Marginal = all other ratings). Data were analyzed across regions and categories, with p-values <0.05 significant. RESULTS: Compared to UK wearers, those in NAm wore fewer toric and multifocal designs, and reported significantly longer average and comfortable wearing times (p < 0.001) but similar levels of general and end-of-day comfort. The prevalence of CL-DE+ differed between the UK and NAm: CL-DE+: 31 vs. 39%, Marginal CL-DE: 13 vs. 14%, and CL-DE-: 56 vs. 47%, p = 0.0001. Although daily disposable (DD) lenses were worn more commonly in the UK than NAm (33 vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), their use did not impact the overall prevalence of dryness symptoms. Between regions, NAm wearers reported significantly more frequent and intense end-of-day discomfort and dryness (p < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to use treatments for CL-related symptoms yet experienced a lower degree of relief. CONCLUSIONS: SCL wearers in NAm reported longer hours of wear with significantly more symptoms of dryness and discomfort. NAm wearers used dryness treatments more often, but experienced less relief than UK wearers. In both regions, the CL-DE categorization was useful to predict poorer comfort, shorter comfortable wearing time, and increased use of treatments. These results highlight the need to benchmark SCL performance locally or regionally to understand and focus on the challenges to the lens wearing experience.