Treatment of Dissecting Vertebral Pseudoaneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Dissecting vertebral artery pseudoaneurysms represent a unique clinical challenge with careful appreciation for location of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Limited data is available in terms of outcomes regarding the various treatment modalities. Methods: 11 patients with dissecting pseudoaneurysms were identified from 2013-2021. Pseudoaneurysm size and morphology, clinical presentation, and treatment approach was collected. Success of treatment was recorded based on post-operative imaging as well as documented overall patient outcomes. Three primary treatment modalities emerged: coil embolization, stent assisted coiling, and flow diversion. Results: Of the 11 patients, 5 were female and 6 were male with an age from 36 to 69.7. 7 had ruptured pseudoaneurysms at time of treatment. Size of pseudoaneurysm ranged from 3 to 6 mm. 8 were on the right and 3 were on the left vertebral artery. 8 were proximal to PICA and 3 were distal. Co-dominance of vertebral filling was seen in 5 patients, 5 with dominance through right vertebral artery, and 1 with dominance through left vertebral artery. Variability existed in treatment approaches with 4 patients undergoing coil occlusion, 5 patients undergoing flow diversion stenting, and 2 patients undergoing flow diversion stenting with jailed coiling. 1 patient had enlargement of pseudoaneurysm while inpatient and required a second flow diversion device. 1 patient had two flow diversion devices placed initially at time of treatment due to morphology of PA. 6 patients had repeat angiograms between 6 to 9 months with complete occlusion. 3 had CTA or MRA with complete occlusion for those that had flow diversion, they were transitioned from aspirin and clopidogrel to aspirin monotherapy after first repeat angiogram. 6 patients required shunt placement for hydrocephalus. 1 patient died prior to discharge due to sepsis. 2 patients died post discharge: 1 with myocardial infarction and the 2nd due to urosepsis.Dissecting vertebral pseudoaneurysm has high morbidity and mortality if rupture occurs. Location of PICA origin influences treatment approach. Patients with poor Hunt/Hess scores upon arrival had increased risk for systemic infection and mortality.

Venous Outflow for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Overview and Treatment Implications.

Introduction: Recent evidence has demonstrated a close relationship between the cerebral venous and lymphatic systems. Venous congestion has been implicated in a host of neurologic disorders, with relevance for vascular etiologies. Objective: The authors aim to review the literature as it pertains to brain arteriovenous malformations' (BAVMs) venous hemodynamics and glymphatic pathways, as well as the implications of BAVM treatment. Results: BAVMs offer a unique challenge, with sudden alteration in flow dynamics leading to increased hemorrhage risk and difficult challenges post-treatment. Conclusion: Recent progress in the understanding of CNS fluid dynamics and glymphatic pathways have revealed important implications for BAVM pathology and treatment. As imaging techniques and treatment modalities advance, there is a need to further investigate this relationship as it relates to therapeutic options and post-treatment sequalae.

Pipeline-assisted coiling versus pipeline in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow-diversion therapy (FDT) for large and complex intracranial aneurysms is effective and considered superior to primary coil embolization. Data evaluating common treatment with both FDT and coiling continues to emerge, but information on outcomes remains scarce. This study aims to examine further the efficiency and outcomes correlated with joint FDT using pipeline embolization device (PED) and coiling compared to PED-alone in treating intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comparative review and analysis of aneurysm treatment with PED in 416 subjects were conducted. Joint modality, PED, and coiling were compared to PED-alone for aneurysm occlusion, recurrence, retreatment, thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events, and functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale. Data on patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, clinical and angiographic follow up, were also collected. Both univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression modeling using mixed-effects were performed. RESULTS: Total of 437 aneurysms were treated using PED of which 74 were managed with both PED and coiling. Average patient-age was 56 years, the majority were men (85%), an average aneurysm size was 9 mm, and the majority were saccular aneurysms (84%). Larger aneurysm size was associated with a poor outcome in patients with unruptured aneurysms (OR = 1.06). Adjusted regression analyses revealed no differences between treatment groups in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events, aneurysm occlusion rate, residual flow on follow up angiography, or functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with joint PED and coiling was safe with no increase in complications when compared to PED alone. Aneurysm occlusion rates and functional outcome with PED and coiling stays comparable to treatment with PED-alone.

Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Recurrent Previously Stented Cerebral Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the management of recurrent previously stented cerebral aneurysms is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of recurrent, previously stented aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with previously stented recurrent aneurysms who later underwent Pipeline Embolization Device placement (group 1) were retrospectively identified and compared with 63 patients who had treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device with no prior stent placement (group 2). Occlusion at the latest follow-up angiogram, recurrence and retreatment rates, clinical outcome, complications, and morbidity and mortality observed after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device were analyzed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The mean time from stent placement to recurrence was 25 months. Pipeline Embolization Device treatment resulted in complete aneurysm occlusion in 55.6% of patients in group 1 versus 80.4% of patients in group 2 (P = .036). The retreatment rate in group 1 was 11.1% versus 7.1% in group 2 (P = .62). The rate of good clinical outcome at the latest follow-up in group 1 was 81% versus 93.2% in group 2 (P = .1). Complications were observed in 14.3% of patients in group 1 and 9.5% of patients in group 2 (P = .684). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the management of previously stented aneurysms is less effective than the use of this device in nonstented aneurysms. Prior stent placement can worsen the safety and efficacy profile of this device.

A single pipeline embolization device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Pipeline Embolization Device has emerged as an important treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. The number of devices needed to treat an aneurysm is uncertain and is the subject of vigorous debate. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of complications, aneurysm occlusion, and outcome in patients treated with a single-versus-multiple Pipeline Embolization Devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight patients were treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device at our institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a single-device group (n = 126) and a multiple-device group (n = 52). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to baseline characteristics except for age and aneurysm size (higher with multiple Pipeline Embolization Devices). Complications occurred more frequently with multiple (15%) versus a single device (5%, P = .03). In multivariate analysis, the use of multiple devices independently predicted complications. A similar proportion of patients achieved adequate aneurysm obliteration at follow-up in the single-device (84%) and the multiple-device groups (87%, P = .8). In multivariate analysis, age and follow-up time predicted obliteration. At follow-up, a significantly higher proportion of patients treated with a single device (97%) achieved a favorable outcome compared with those treated with multiple devices (89%, P = .03). In multivariate analysis, there was a strong trend for the use of a single device to predict favorable outcomes (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a single Pipeline Embolization Device provides similar occlusion rates with less complications and better overall outcomes. These findings suggest that a single Pipeline Embolization Device is sufficient for treatment of most intracranial aneurysms.

Coiling of large and giant aneurysms: complications and long-term results of 334 cases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Large and giant intracranial aneurysms are increasingly treated with endovascular techniques. The goal of this study was to retrospectively analyze the complications and long-term results of coiling in large and giant aneurysms (≥ 10 mm) and identify predictors of outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 334 large or giant aneurysms (≥ 10 mm) were coiled in our institution between 2004 and 2011. Medical charts and imaging studies were reviewed to determine baseline characteristics, procedural complications, and clinical/angiographic outcomes. Aneurysm size was 15 mm on average. Two hundred twenty-five aneurysms were treated with conventional coiling; 88, with stent-assisted coiling; 14, with parent vessel occlusion; and 7, with balloon-assisted coiling. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 10.5% of patients, with 1 death (0.3%). Aneurysm location and ruptured aneurysms predicted complications. Angiographic follow-up was available for 84% of patients at 25.4 months on average. Recanalization and retreatment rates were 39% and 33%, respectively. Larger aneurysm size, increasing follow-up time, conventional coiling, and aneurysm location predicted both recurrence and retreatment. The annual rebleeding rate was 1.9%. Larger aneurysm size, increasing follow-up time, and aneurysm location predicted new or recurrent hemorrhage. Favorable outcomes occurred in 92% of patients. Larger aneurysm size, poor Hunt and Hess grades, and new or recurrent hemorrhage predicted poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Coiling of large and giant aneurysms has a reasonable safety profile with good clinical outcomes, but aneurysm reopening remains very common. Stent-assisted coiling has lower recurrence, retreatment, and new or recurrent hemorrhage rates with no additional morbidity compared with conventional coiling. Aneurysm size was a major determinant of recanalization, retreatment, new or recurrent hemorrhage, and poor outcome.

Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases.

Five patients were found to have spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of their Pipeline Embolization Devices on follow-up angiography. The device migrated proximally in 4 patients and distally in 1 patient. One patient had a subarachnoid hemorrhage and died as a result of migration of the Pipeline Embolization Device, and another patient presented with complete MCA occlusion and was left severely disabled. Mismatch in arterial diameter between inflow and outflow vessels was a constant finding. Migration of the Pipeline Embolization Device was managed conservatively, with additional placement of the device, or with parent vessel occlusion. Obtaining complete expansion of the embolization device by using a longer device, increasing vessel coverage, using adjunctive aneurysm coiling, and avoiding dragging and stretching of the device are important preventive measures. Neurointerventionalists should be aware of this potentially fatal complication and take all necessary preventive measures.

Stent-assisted coiling versus balloon remodeling of wide-neck aneurysms: comparison of angiographic outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling are 2 well-established techniques for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. A direct comparative analysis of angiographic outcomes with the 2 techniques has not been available. We compare the angiographic outcomes of wide-neck aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling versus balloon-assisted coiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 101 consecutive patients treated at our institution, 69 with stent-assisted coiling and 32 with balloon-assisted coiling. Two multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of aneurysm obliteration and predictors of progressive aneurysm thrombosis at follow-up. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable with respect to all baseline characteristics with the exception of a higher proportion of ruptured aneurysms in the balloon-assisted coiling group (65.6%) than in the stent-assisted coiling group (11.5%, P < .001). Procedural complications did not differ between the stent-assisted coiling group (6%) and the balloon-assisted coiling group (9%, P = .5). The rates of complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond score 1) at the most recent follow-up were significantly higher for the stent-assisted coiling group (75.4%) compared with the balloon-assisted coiling group (50%, P = .01). Progressive occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms was noted in 76.6% of aneurysms in the stent-assisted coiling group versus 42.8% in the balloon-assisted coiling group (P = .02). Retreatment rates were significantly lower with stent-assisted coiling (4.3%) versus balloon-assisted coiling (15.6%, P = .05). In multivariate analysis, stented aneurysms independently predicted both complete aneurysm obliteration and progression of occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-assisted coiling may yield lower rates of retreatment and higher rates of aneurysm obliteration and progression of occlusion at follow-up than balloon-assisted coiling with a similar morbidity rate.

Endovascular treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms with oculomotor nerve palsy: clinical outcomes and predictors of nerve recovery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ONP is a well-known presentation of PcomA aneurysms. Reports on recovery of ONP with endovascular coiling have been limited to small case series. We assessed the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy in a series of PcomA aneurysms with ONP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 37 patients with ONP who underwent endovascular treatment in our institution between 2005 and 2011. Published studies were also reviewed to determine the overall rate of ONP recovery with endovascular therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (51.4%) presented with complete ONP, and 18 (48.6%), with partial ONP. Conventional coiling was performed in 31 (83.8%) patients; stent-assisted coiling, in 4 (10.8%); and balloon remodeling, in 2 (5.4%). There was 1 (2.7%) procedural complication (a transient thromboembolic event). Twenty-seven (73%) patients were treated within 3 days from symptom onset. At the last available clinical follow-up, ONP resolution was complete in 14 (37.8%) patients and partial in 19 (51.4%). Only 4 (10.8%) patients showed no signs of nerve recovery. In multivariate analysis, partial ONP and longer follow-up durations were predictors of complete nerve recovery. Treatment timing, type of endovascular embolization, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and initial degree of aneurysm occlusion were not predictors of nerve recovery. Of 169 patients reported in the literature (including ours), ONP resolved completely in 73 (43.2%) patients and partially in 73 (43.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy is a safe and highly efficient alternative to surgical clipping for PcomA aneurysms with ONP.

Superior hypophyseal artery aneurysms have the lowest recurrence rate with endovascular therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Given the challenges posed by surgical clipping, endovascular techniques have been increasingly used to treat SHA aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular techniques in the treatment of SHA aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical charts and initial and follow-up angiograms were reviewed retrospectively for all patients treated with endovascular procedures at our institution between January 2006 and February 2011. RESULTS: We identified 87 patients with SHA aneurysms who were treated with endovascular techniques. Of these patients, 79 were women and only 8 were men (90.8% female predominance). Thirty-five patients were treated with coil embolization; 45, with stent-assisted coiling; 4, with balloon-assisted coil embolization; and 3, with a flow-diversion technique. Minor complications occurred in 2 patients (2.2%). None of the patients had a major complication. The mortality and permanent morbidity rates related to the procedure were 0%. Imaging follow-up was available for 89.4% of patients (DSA in 65, MRA in 11 patients) at a mean time point of 10.4 months (range, 6-60 months). Of the 76 patients with available follow-up, 3 patients had a recurrence (3.9%) and only 1 required further intervention (1.3%). Stent-assisted coiling was associated with lower recurrence rates than simple coil embolization. CONCLUSIONS: SHA aneurysms have the lowest recurrence rate with endovascular treatment compared with aneurysms in other locations by using historical data. Because of its safety and efficacy, endovascular therapy should be considered the procedure of choice for the treatment of SHA aneurysms.