Submerged Vegetation Responses to Climate Variation and Altered Hydrology in a Subtropical Estuary: Interpreting 33 Years of Change.

Links between hydrologic modifications, flow and salinity regimes, and submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) species composition and abundance were assessed with an empirical analysis of 33 years of monitoring data collected at nine sites in Florida's Caloosahatchee River Estuary (CRE). Freshwater inflows to the estuary (30-day means) were often outside the previously recommended envelope of 12.74 to 79.29 m3 s-1. Discharges from Lake Okeechobee through a synthetic hydrologic link were responsible for 43% of the above-envelope flows, but reduced the incidence of below-envelope flows by 30%. A salinity model and salinity stress indices developed for each SAV species indicated that the observed flows generated variable salinity conditions likely to harm both seagrasses and freshwater SAV in the estuary. Regression modeling of SAV abundance generally confirmed the flow and salinity responses expected for each species: Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudinum in the lower estuary were both harmed by high-flow, low-salinity conditions, while Vallisneria americana in the upper estuary was decimated by low-flow, high-salinity conditions. There was a species-specific effect of the seasonal timing of high flows-T. testudinum was more negatively correlated with high flows in the dry season; H. wrightii in the wet season. The regression analyses also highlighted strong, year-to-year autocorrelations in SAV abundance, indicating reduced resilience after severe losses, particularly for V. americana. Large residual variation in some regression models suggested that factors other than salinity (e.g., optical water quality or grazing impacts) may also influence the system dynamics and should be incorporated in continuing research. This analysis suggests that use of artificial water management infrastructure to reduce extreme high and low flows to the Caloosahatchee and other estuaries could help maintain SAV health in light of intensifying climate variability and degraded watershed flow regulation capacity.

Determining the effects of freshwater inflow on benthic macrofauna in the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida.

Florida legislation requires determining and implementing an appropriate range and frequency of freshwater inflows that will sustain a fully functional estuary. Changes in inflow dynamics to the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida have altered salinity regimes that, in turn, have altered the ecological integrity of the estuary. The purpose of this current project is to determine how changes in freshwater inflows affect water quality, and in turn, benthic macrofauna, spatially within the Caloosahatchee Estuary and between multiyear wet and dry periods. Thirty-four benthic species were identified as being indicator species for salinity zones, and the estuary was divided into 4 zones based on differences in community structure within the estuary. Community structure had the highest correlations with water quality parameters that were common indicators of freshwater conditions resulting from inflows. A significant relationship between salinity and diversity occurs both spatially and temporally because of increased numbers of marine species as salinities increase. A salinity-based model was used to estimate inflow during wet and dry periods for each of the macrofauna community zones. The approach used here (identifying bioindicators and community zones with corresponding inflow ranges) is generic and will be useful for developing targets for managing inflow in estuaries worldwide. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:529-539. © 2015 SETAC.

Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy: stenosis and stability.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro human cadaveric study simultaneously quantifying sagittal plane flexibility and spinal canal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To compare biomechanical stability and the change in cross-sectional area during flexion and extension after laminectomy and open-door laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal canal stenosis has been quantified in vitro but has not been quantified in studies of laminectomy or laminoplasty. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens were loaded in physiologic-range flexion and extension using nonconstraining pure moments while recording segmental angles optoelectronically. Custom flexible tubing was placed within the spinal canal, and water was continuously pumped through the tubing while measuring upstream pressure. Spinal canal cross-sectional area correlated to water pressure, allowing continuous monitoring of the smallest cross-sectional area of the canal. Specimens were tested (1) normal, (2) after modeling stenosis by inserting hemispherical wooden beads in the spinal canal at 3 levels, (3) after open-door laminoplasty at 5 levels, and (4) after expanding laminoplasty to laminectomy. RESULTS: Range of motion (ROM) in the normal, stenotic, and laminoplasty conditions did not differ significantly. However, laminectomy increased ROM significantly more than other conditions. ROM after laminectomy was 13% greater than after laminoplasty. After modeling stenosis, the cross-sectional area decreased to 52% +/- 12% of normal. Laminoplasty restored the cross-sectional area to 70% +/- 12% of normal whereas laminectomy restored cross-sectional area to 101% +/- 4% of normal. Among all conditions, areas differed significantly except normal versus laminectomy. CONCLUSION: Laminoplasty leaves the spine in a significantly more stable condition than laminectomy. However, laminoplasty failed to relieve stenosis completely. In this study, stenosis was modeled as about 50% occlusion of the spinal canal. The degree of stenosis should be considered in clinical decisions of whether laminectomy or laminoplasty is more appropriate.

Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro flexibility test comparing biomechanics of cervical corpectomy versus discectomy with and without instrumentation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the additional effort required to perform multilevel discectomies instead of corpectomies is worthwhile biomechanically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both cervical corpectomy and discectomy have been shown to be effective clinically. No previous biomechanical comparison exists. METHODS: Fourteen human cadaveric cervical spines were studied: 1) intact, 2) after discectomy and wedge grafting at C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 (Group 1) or corpectomy and strut grafting of C5 and C6 (Group 2), 3) after attaching a locking metal plate from C4-C7, and 4) after adding posterior locking lateral mass screw/rod instrumentation across C4-C7. Non-constraining, nondestructive torques induced flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (maximum, 1.5 Nm) while angular motion was measured stereophotogrammetrically. RESULTS: Discectomy and grafting did not alter the range of motion (ROM) significantly from normal during any loading mode (P > 0.11). Corpectomy and grafting allowed a significantly greater range of motion than normal during flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation (P < 0.05). Addition of an anterior plate reduced ROM to significantly less than normal during all loading modes in both groups (P < 0.005). Addition of posterior instrumentation further reduced ROM significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in ROM between corpectomy and discectomy groups in any loading mode whether uninstrumented (P > 0.18), anteriorly plated (P > 0.33), or anteriorly and posteriorly instrumented (P > 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Less difference in stability was observed than was predicted between specimens receiving multilevel discectomy versus multilevel corpectomy, regardless of whether specimens were left unplated, plated anteriorly, or fixated with combined anterior/posterior instrumentation.

Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Extrapedicular screws are placed more laterally than intrapedicular screws and pass through the transverse process or rib head before entering the vertebral body. These screws are sometimes placed to salvage failed pedicle screws, but the change in pullout resistance of extrapedicular screws after salvage has not been quantified. PURPOSE: To quantify the pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws compared with intrapedicular screws and the pullout resistance of newly inserted screws compared with extrapedicular screws used as salvage for failed intrapedicular screws. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro paired comparison of screw pullout resistance in isolated thoracic vertebrae. METHODS: Tapered monoaxial pedicle screws were inserted in the left or right pedicle of 11 human cadaveric thoracic vertebrae. An extrapedicular screw was inserted on the contralateral side. Both screws were pulled out axially at 0.5 mm/s using a servohydraulic test frame while applied load was recorded. Then a fresh extrapedicular screw was inserted as a salvage screw on the intrapedicular screw side and pulled out. RESULTS: In uncompromised vertebrae, the pullout strength of extrapedicular screws was 80+/-32% of that of intrapedicular screws (p=.073, repeated-measures one-way analysis of variance/Tukey). Salvage screws restored pullout strength to 65+/-30% of that of intrapedicular screws (p=.003). CONCLUSIONS: Extrapedicular screws provided comparable but slightly lower pullout resistance to intrapedicular screws in uncompromised vertebrae. They are therefore a feasible salvage technique when a compromised pedicle precludes reinsertion of an intrapedicular screw, but the salvage screw is significantly weaker than the original screw.

Traumatic loading of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: The Bryan disc prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) relies on a precise fit between the device and the vertebral endplates to provide immediate stability after cervical arthroplasty. The safety of the cervical arthroplasty in the setting of trauma is unknown. We compare the segmental strength of the normal cervical spine and the cervical spine after single-level arthroplasty. METHODS: Fifteen cadaveric cervical spines with arthroplasty placed at the C5-C6 level were compared with 16 intact cadaveric controls. A pure moment was applied to induce flexion, extension, or axial rotation until the segment failed. RESULTS: The prosthesis provided 63, 45, and 69% of the strength of a normal spine during flexion, extension, and rotation, respectively. There were no cases of prosthesis expulsion. CONCLUSION: After insertion of the Bryan disc, the remaining ligamentous tissues provide adequate acute stability to the spine.

Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Locking posterior instrumentation in the cervical spine can be attached using 1) pedicle screws, 2) lateral mass screws, or 3) laminar hooks. This order of options is in order of decreasing technical difficulty and decreasing depth of fixation, and is thought to be in order of decreasing stability. PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether substantially different biomechanical stability can be achieved in a two-level construct using pedicle screws, lateral mass screws, or laminar hooks. Secondarily, we sought to quantify the differential and additional stability provided by an anterior plate. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical flexibility experiment comparing three different posterior constructs for stabilizing the cervical spine after three-column injury. METHODS: Twenty-one human cadaveric cervical spines were divided into three groups. Group 1 received lateral mass screws at C5 and C6 and pedicle screws at C7; Group 2 received lateral mass screws at C5 and C6 and laminar hooks at C7; Group 3 received pedicle screws at C5, C6, and C7. Specimens were nondestructively tested intact, after a three-column two-level injury, after posterior C5-C7 rod fixation, after two-level discectomy and anterior plating, and after removing posterior fixation. Angular motion was recorded during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Posterior hardware was subsequently failed by dorsal loading. RESULTS: Laminar hooks performed well in resisting flexion and extension but were less effective in resisting lateral bending and axial rotation, allowing greater range of motion (ROM) than screw constructs and allowing a significantly greater percentage of the two-level ROM to occur across the hook level than the screw level (p<.03). Adding an anterior plate significantly improved stability in all three groups. With combined hardware, Group 3 resisted axial rotation significantly worse than the other groups. Posterior instrumentation resisted lateral bending significantly better than anterior plating in all groups (p<.04) and resisted flexion and axial rotation significantly better than anterior plating in most cases. Standard deviation of the ROM was greater with anterior than with posterior fixation. There was no significant difference among groups in resistance to failure (p=.74). CONCLUSIONS: Individual pedicle screws are known to outperform lateral mass screws in terms of pullout resistance, but they offered no apparent advantage in terms of construct stability or failure of whole constructs. Larger standard deviations in anterior fixation imply more variability in the quality of fixation. In most loading modes, laminar hooks provided similar stability to lateral mass screws or pedicle screws; caudal laminar hooks are therefore an acceptable alternative posteriorly. Posterior two-level fixation is less variable and slightly more stable than anterior fixation. Combined instrumentation is significantly more stable than either anterior or posterior alone.

Hangman's fracture: a biomechanical comparison of stabilization techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical flexibility experiment studying 5 sequential conditions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the biomechanical differences among 3 fixation techniques after a simulated hangman's fracture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Type II hangman's fractures are often treated surgically with a C2-C3 anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating. Other techniques include direct fixation with C2 pars interarticularis screws or posterior C2-C3 fixation connecting C2 pars screws to C3 lateral mass screws. METHODS: Seven cadaveric specimens (Oc-C4) were tested intact, after a simulated hangman's fracture, and after each fixation technique. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were induced using nonconstraining torques while recording angular motions stereophotogrammetrically. RESULTS: Direct screw fixation reduced motion an average of 61% +/- 13% during lateral bending and axial rotation compared to the injured state (P < 0.007). However, instability remained during flexion and extension. Posterior C2-C3 rod fixation provided significantly greater rigidity than anterior plate fixation during lateral bending (P < 0.008) and axial rotation (P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Direct fixation of the pars ineffectively limits flexion and extension after a Type II hangman's fracture. If pars screw fixation can be achieved, posterior C2-C3 fixation more effectively stabilizes a hangman's fracture than anterior cervical plating.

Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1-2 transarticular screw-graft fixation.

OBJECT: Two new techniques for atlantoaxial fixation have been recently described. In one technique, C-2 intralaminar screws are connected with C-1 lateral mass screws; in the second, C-1 and C-3 lateral mass screws are interconnected and C-2 is wired sublaminarly. Both techniques include a C1-2 interspinous graft. The authors compared these techniques with the gold-standard, interspinous graft-augmented C1-2 transarticular screw fixation and with a control C1-2 interspinous graft fixation procedure alone. METHODS: In six human cadaveric occiput-C4 specimens, nonconstraining 1.5-Nm pure moments were applied to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation during which three-dimensional angular motion was measured optoelectronically. Each specimen was tested in the normal state, with graft alone (after odontoidectomy), and then in varying order after applying each construct with a rewired graft. All three constructs allowed significantly less angular motion at the C1-2 junction than the wired interspinous graft alone during lateral bending and axial rotation (p < 0.01, paired Student t-test) but not during flexion or extension. Transarticular screw fixation with an interspinous graft allowed less motion at the atlantoaxial junction than the two new constructs in several conditions. Differences were greater between the transarticular screw construct and the intralaminar screw construct than between the transarticular screw construct and the C1-3 lateral mass screw construct. During lateral bending and axial rotation, the C1-3 construct allowed less motion at the atlantoaxial junction than the intralaminar screw construct. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanically, the gold-standard C1-2 transarticular screw fixation outperformed the two new techniques during lateral bending and axial rotation. Wiring C-2 to C1-3 rods provided greater stability than C1-2 laminar screws, but it sacrificed C2-3 mobility. It is unknown whether the small differences observed biomechanically would lead to clinically relevant differences in fusion rates.

Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.

STUDY DESIGN: Human lumbosacral cadaveric specimens were tested in an in vitro biomechanical flexibility experiment using physiologic loads in 5 sequential conditions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the biomechanical differences between anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using cylindrical threaded cages alone or supplemented with an anterior screw-plate or posterior pedicle screws-rods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinically and biomechanically, stand-alone ALIF performs modestly in immobilizing the unstable spine. Pedicle screws improve fixation stiffness significantly, but supplementary anterior instrumentation has not been studied. METHODS: There were 7 specimens tested: (1) intact, (2) after discectomy and facetectomy to induce moderate rotational and translational hypermobility, (3) with 2 parallel ALIF cages, (4) with cages plus a triangular anterior screw-plate, and (5) with cages plus pedicle screws-rods. Pure moments without preload induced flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation; linear shear forces induced anteroposterior translation. Angular and linear motions were measured stereophotogrammetrically, and range of motion (ROM) and stiffness were quantified. RESULTS: Compared to the destabilized spine, interbody cages alone reduced ROM by 77% during flexion, 53% during extension, 60% during lateral bending, 69% during axial rotation, and 71% during anteroposterior shear (P < 0.001, analysis of variance/Fisher least significant difference). Addition of an anterior plate or pedicle screws-rods, respectively, further reduced ROM by 8% or 13% during flexion (P = 0.21), 21% or 28% during extension (P = 0.15), 5% or 25% during lateral bending (P = 0.04), 11% or 18% during axial rotation (P = 0.13), and 18% or 18% during anteroposterior shear (P = 0.17). Compared to stand-alone ALIF, both the anterior screw-plate and pedicle screw-rod fixation reduced vertebral ROM to less than 1.2 degrees of rotation and less than 0.1 mm of translation. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior screw-plate and pedicle screws-rods both substantially reduced ROM and increased stiffness compared to stand-alone interbody cages. There was no significant difference in the amount by which the supplementary fixation devices limited flexion, extension, axial rotation, or anteroposterior shear; pedicle screws-rods better restricted lateral bending.

A biomechanical comparison of three anterior thoracolumbar implants after corpectomy: are two screws better than one?

OBJECT: A flexibility experiment using human cadaveric thoracic spine specimens was performed to determine biomechanical differences among thoracolumbar two-screw plate, single-screw plate, and dual-rod systems. A secondary goal was to investigate differences in the ability of the systems to stabilize the spine after a one- or two-level corpectomy. METHODS: The authors evaluated 21 cadaveric spines implanted with a titanium mesh cage and three types of anterior thoracolumbar supplementary instrumentation after one-level thoracic corpectomies. Pure moments were applied quasistatically while three-dimensional motion was measured optoelectronically. The lax zone, stiff zone, and range of motion (ROM) were measured during flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right axial rotation. Corpectomies were expanded to two levels, and testing was repeated with longer hardware. Biomechanical testing showed that the single-bolt plate system was no different from the dual-rod system with two screws in limiting ROM. The single-bolt plate system performed slightly better than the two-screw plate system. Across the same two levels, there was an average of 19% more motion after a two-level corpectomy than after a one-level corpectomy. In general, however, the difference across the different loading modes was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanically, the single-screw plate system is equivalent to a two-screw dual-rod and a two-screw plate system. All three systems performed similarly in stabilizing the spine after one- or two-level corpectomies.

Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed bioabsorbable anterior cervical plate. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005.

OBJECT: The authors present a biomechanical analysis of a newly designed bioabsorbable anterior cervical plate (ACP) for the treatment of one-level cervical degenerative disc disease. They studied anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in a human cadaveric model, comparing the stability of the cervical spine after placement of the bioabsorbable fusion plate, a bioabsorbable mesh, and a more traditional metallic ACP. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric specimens underwent a C6-7 fibular graft-assisted ACDF placement. A one-level resorbable ACP was then placed and secured with bioabsorbable screws. Flexibility testing was performed on both intact and instrumented specimens using a servohydraulic system to create flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motions. After data analysis, three parameters were calculated: angular range of motion, lax zone, and stiff zone. The results were compared with those obtained in a previous study of a resorbable fusion mesh and with those acquired using metallic fusion ACPs. For all parameters studied, the resorbable plate consistently conferred greater stability than the resorbable mesh. Moreover, it offered comparable stability with that of metallic fusion ACPs. CONCLUSIONS: Bioabsorbable plates provide better stability than resorbable mesh. Although the results of this study do not necessarily indicate that a resorbable plate confers equivalent stability to a metal plate, the resorbable ACP certainly yielded better results than the resorbable mesh. Bioabsorbable fusion ACPs should therefore be considered as alternatives to metal plates when a graft containment device is required.

Biomechanics of stabilization after cervicothoracic compression-flexion injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical laboratory research. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether anterior, posterior, or combined instrumentation provides the best stability for treating a cervicothoracic compression-flexion injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As the junction between the mobile cervical spine and rigid thoracic spine, the cervicothoracic junction poses unique challenges to the success of any fixation system spanning this region. Although posterior instrumentation is the preferred method of fixation in the unstable cervical spine, it is unknown whether this is the case across the unstable cervicothoracic junction. METHODS: Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of cadaveric specimens were studied during application of nondestructive pure moments in a sequence of conditions: (1) intact, (2) after destabilization, (3) with posterior instrumentation from C6-T1 or T2, and (4) with corpectomy/graft and anterior alone or combined anterior/posterior instrumentation. RESULTS: Compared to anterior instrumentation, posterior instrumentation allowed an 89% smaller range of motion (ROM) during lateral bending (P = 0.01) and 64% smaller ROM during axial rotation (P = 0.04). In most loading modes, combined instrumentation outperformed either anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Most biomechanical measurements of stability improved when posterior instrumentation was extended from T1 to T2. Small and usually insignificant reductions in ROM averaging 15% were observed with C7 included in the posterior construct versus C7 excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Combined instrumentation provides a significant improvement in stability over either anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Extension of the posterior instrumentation to include T2 improves stability at T1-T2 as well as rostral levels. Inclusion of C7 in the construct is largely inconsequential biomechanically.

Biomechanical analysis of a resorbable anterior cervical graft containment plate.

STUDY DESIGN: A series of in vitro experiments were performed in human cadaveric cervical spines in the normal condition, after discectomy and graft, and instrumented with MacroPore resorbable anterior plates (MacroPore, San Diego, CA). Flexibility, graft containment, and load-to-failure were studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the stability, strength, and resistance to graft extrusion provided by the resorbable plate after discectomy and grafting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Metallic plates are known to improve stability after discectomy and graft. Resorbable plates have not been evaluated regarding stability offered or ability to contain the graft. METHODS: Specimens were loaded using nonconstraining, nondestructive torques to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. One and 2-level specimens were studied: (1) normal, (2) after discectomy and graft, (3) after resorbable plating with 2 screws per vertebra, and (4) after resorbable plating with 3 screws per vertebra. All specimens were loaded to failure after completing nondestructive tests. Additional 1-level specimens with and without resorbable plate were tested for graft containment using anterior shear force directly on the graft. RESULTS: The 1-level resorbable plate did not limit motion significantly better than grafted but unplated specimens. However, 2-level resorbable plates allowed significantly less motion than grafted but unplated specimens during all loading modes (P < 0.05). Specimens with resorbable plates resisted graft extrusion significantly better than unplated specimens. With 1-level resorbable plates, 2 or 3 screws per vertebra provided equivalent stability; in 2-level plates, 3 screws provided significantly better stability. Comparison to previous 1-level metallic plate data revealed a significant difference in motion only during flexion. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-level resorbable plate does not increase stability compared to grafted but unplated specimens and provides less stability than a metal plate, especially during flexion. However, the resorbable plate substantially improves resistance to graft extrusion. The 2-level resorbable plate significantly reduces motion compared to grafted but unplated specimens. When applying a 2-level plate, 3 screws per vertebra are recommended. In a 1-level plate, 2 or 3 screws per vertebra are equivalent.

Unilateral cervical facet dislocation: biomechanics of fixation.

STUDY DESIGN: Unilateral facet dislocation was created in human cadaveric cervical spines. Specimens were sequentially instrumented with posterior or anterior screws and plates, and studied biomechanically. OBJECTIVE: To determine the biomechanical differences between anterior and posterior fixation for stabilization of a reduced unilateral cervical facet dislocation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although previous studies have compared anterior to posterior instrumentation, no data exist on the biomechanics of either type of stabilization after this particular injury. METHODS: In 6 human cadaveric cervical spine segments, a reproducible unilateral facet dislocation was created and then unlocked (reduced). Nondestructive torques were applied to specimens that were intact, injured-reduced, fixated using posterior nonlocking lateral mass plates, and fixated using a bone graft plus an anterior nonlocking plate. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were measured stereophotogrammetrically. RESULTS: Lateral mass plating was more effective than anterior plating in limiting motion after reduction of a unilateral facet dislocation. Averaged, over all loading directions, lateral mass plates reduced the range of motion to 17% of normal; anterior plates reduced range of motion to 89% of normal. In all loading directions, lateral mass plates performed significantly better than anterior plates (P < 0.05, paired Student t-tests). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and posterior plating effectively stabilized a reduced unilateral facet dislocation. Lateral mass fixation provided better immobilization than anterior graft and plate.

Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparison of nondestructive multidirectional flexibility in groups of specimens receiving two different posterior instrumentation constructs with or without anterior plating. OBJECTIVE: To compare stability after a three-column injury stabilized posteriorly by lateral mass screws-rods at C5-C6 and pedicle screws-rods at C7 ("LLP") or by pedicle screws-rods at C5-C6-C7 ("PPP"), and to compare posterior, anterior, and combined anterior-posterior fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws resist pullout better than lateral mass screws, but little research has compared the stability of pedicle screws to that of lateral mass screws used within constructs. METHODS: Fourteen human cadaveric C4-T1 specimens were tested intact, posteriorly instrumented (7 LLP and 7 PPP), anteriorly instrumented, or with combined (anterior-posterior) instrumentation. Nonconstraining, nondestructive torques induced flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while angular motion was recorded optically. RESULTS: Posterior, anterior, and combined instrumentation each significantly improved stability (P < 0.05). Combined fixation provided significantly better stability than either anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. In no loading mode and in no testing condition was any parameter significantly different between LLP and PPP. Posterior instrumentation provided significantly better stability than anterior instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior plate and posterior screw-rod fixation alone improve stability in a two-level, three-column cervical injury model. Combined fixation further improves stability. There is little discernible difference in immediate postoperative stability between posterior rod constructs combining lateral mass and pedicle screws and those using only pedicle screws.

Biomechanical comparison of C1-2 posterior fixation techniques.

OBJECT: In a nondestructive, repeated-measures in vitro flexibility experiment, the authors compared the acute stability of C1-2 after placement of C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pars interarticularis (LC1-PC2) instrumentation with that of C1-2 transarticular screw fixation. METHODS: The effect of C-1 laminectomy and C1-2 interspinous cable/graft fixation on LC1-PC2 stability was studied. Screw pullout strengths were also compared. Seven human cadaveric occiput-C3 specimens were loaded nondestructively with pure moments while measuring nonconstrained atlantoaxial motion. Specimens were tested with graft alone, LC1-PC2 alone, LC1-PC2 combined with C-1 laminectomy, and graft-augmented LC1-PC2. Interspinous cable/graft fixation significantly enhanced LC1-PC2 stability during extension. After C-1 laminectomy, the LC1-PC2 construct allowed increased motion during flexion and extension. There was no significant difference in lax zone or range of motion between LC1-PC2 fixation and transarticular screw fixation, but graft-assisted transarticular screws yielded a significantly smaller stiff zone during extension. The difference in pullout resistance between C-1 lateral mass screws and C-2 pars interarticularis screws was insignificant. The LC1-PC2 region restricted motion to within the normal range during all loading modes. Atlantal laminectomy reduced LC1-PC2 stability during flexion and extension. CONCLUSIONS: The instrumentation-augmented LC1-PC2 construct performed biomechanically similarly to the C1-2 transarticular screw fixation. The LC1-PC2 construct resisted flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation well. The weakness of the LC1-PC2 fixation in resisting extension can be overcome by adding an interspinous graft to the construct.

Biomechanical evaluation of a bioresorbable odontoid screw.

OBJECT: The authors tested the ability of a resorbable cannulated lag screw composed of a polylactide copolymer to repair Type II odontoid fractures. The resorbable screw was evaluated for its ability to restore strength and stiffness to the fractured odontoid process compared with traditional titanium screws. METHODS: Type II odontoid fractures were created in 14 human cadaveric C-2 vertebrae by applying a posterolaterally directed load and piston displacement was measured. Seven of these specimens were repaired using metal screws and seven were repaired using resorbable screws. Specimens were reinjured using the same mechanism as the initial fracture. Values of ultimate strength and stiffness during failure were statistically compared between metal and resorbable screws and between initial fracture and reinjury. CONCLUSIONS: The stiffness and ultimate strength during initial fracture were significantly greater than those during reinjury in specimens repaired using resorbable screws or titanium screws (p < 0.001). The resorbable and titanium screws both restored 31% of the initial ultimate strength of the intact specimen (p = 0.95). The stiffness of the fractured odontoid process was restored to 15 and 23% of its initial value by repair with resorbable and metal screws, respectively (p = 0.07). The mode of failure in resorbable screws was usually breakage or bending, whereas that in metal screws was consistently cutout of the proximal shaft of the screw through the anterior C-2 vertebral body.

Biomechanical comparison of anterior versus posterior lumbar threaded interbody fusion cages.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical flexibility tests were performed in specimens receiving anterior lumbar interbody fixation or posterior lumbar interbody fixation using dual threaded cages. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in stability between anterior lumbar interbody fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fixation immediately after surgery and after fatigue. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No direct biomechanical comparison of lumbar fixation with threaded anterior lumbar interbody fixation or posterior lumbar interbody fixation cages has been performed previously. METHODS.: Sixteen anterior lumbar interbody fixation specimens and 16 posterior lumbar interbody fixation specimens underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing. Flexibility was assessed during applied flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and anteroposterior shear before and after fixation and fatigue. After testing, specimens were dissected, and the quality of fixation was graded. RESULTS: Variability in angular range of motion after fixation was greater than normal interspecimen variability by 89% after anterior lumbar interbody fixation and by 117% after posterior lumbar interbody fixation. During flexion-extension and lateral bending, posterior lumbar interbody fixation allowed a mean of 60% smaller neutral zones than anterior lumbar interbody fixation (P < 0.05, nonpaired Student t test). During axial rotation, anterior lumbar interbody fixation allowed 15% less range of motion than posterior lumbar interbody fixation unless facets were kept intact with posterior lumbar interbody fixation (6 of 16 specimens), in which case anterior lumbar interbody fixation allowed 41% greater range of motion than posterior lumbar interbody fixation. During anteroposterior shear, both anterior lumbar interbody fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fixation restrained range of motion to within 50% of normal. Anterior lumbar interbody fixation loosened, on average, 130% more with fatigue than posterior lumbar interbody fixation during anteroposterior shear. CONCLUSIONS: Both anterior lumbar interbody fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fixation provided inconsistent stability. Therefore, stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fixation or posterior lumbar interbody fixation may often be ineffective clinically. During all modes of loading except axial rotation, posterior lumbar interbody fixation performed slightly better than anterior lumbar interbody fixation, perhaps due to deeper hole preparation and destruction of anterior stabilizers necessary for anterior lumbar interbody fixation. Avoiding resection of facets during posterior lumbar interbody fixation led to significantly better performance during axial rotation.

In vivo evaluation of bioresorbable polylactide implants for cervical graft containment in an ovine spinal fusion model.

OBJECT: An in vivo study was conducted in an ovine model to investigate the biomechanical changes after the animals underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy followed by fusion in which autologous tricortical graft was used and implantation of cervical plates for which bioresorbable polymer screws and plates were used. The specific aims of the study were to evaluate whether implant failure or screw backout would occur over time and to measure the change in stiffness at the treated level at various postoperative time periods (3, 6, and 12 months). METHODS: A total of 58 x-ray films were evaluated over the 12-month survival period. No screw breakage or displacement was observed in any animal during the temporal radiographic analysis. Radiographically confirmed fusion appeared to be complete at all time periods longer than 6 months. The biomechanical testing demonstrated dramatic reductions in range of motion at the fusion level in the animals allowed to survive for 6 and 12 months, indicating complete fusion after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The bioresorbable polymer cervical graft containment system appears to provide a safe and effective alternative for cervical fusion, and warrants further clinical evaluation for its use in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without postoperative orthosis.