The Black Lives Matter Movement: A Call to Action for Couple and Family Therapists.

The frequent police killings during the COVID-19 pandemic forced a reckoning among Americans from all backgrounds and propelled the Black Lives Matter movement into a global force. This manuscript addresses major issues to aid practitioners in the effective treatment of African Americans via the lens of Critical Race Theory and the Bioecological Model. We place the impacts of racism on Black families in historical context and outline the sources of Black family resilience. We critique structural racism embedded in all aspects of psychology and allied fields. We provide an overview of racial socialization and related issues affecting the parenting decisions in Black families, as well as a detailed overview of impacts of structural racism on couple dynamics. Recommendations are made for engaging racial issues in therapy, providing emotional support and validation to couples and families experiencing discrimination and racial trauma, and using Black cultural strengths as therapeutic resources.

Las frecuentes muertes a manos de la policía durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 obligaron a los estadounidenses de todos los orígenes a hacer una evaluación e impulsaron el movimiento Black Lives Matter hasta convertirlo en una fuerza mundial. Este manuscrito aborda las cuestiones principales con el fin de ayudar a los profesionales en el tratamiento eficaz de los afroestadounidenses desde la perspectiva de la teoría crítica de la raza y el modelo bioecológico. Ubicamos los efectos del racismo en las familias negras en un contexto histórico y describimos las fuentes de resiliencia de estas familias. Analizamos el racismo estructural incorporado en todos los aspectos de la psicología y en áreas afines. Ofrecemos un resumen de la socialización racial y de cuestiones relacionadas que afectan las decisiones de crianza en las familias negras, así como un panorama detallado de los efectos del racismo estructural en la dinámica de pareja. Se dan recomendaciones para integrar las cuestiones raciales en la terapia, brindar apoyo emocional y validación a parejas y familias que sufren discriminación y trauma racial, y usar las ventajas culturales de las personas de color como recursos terapéuticos.

African American Couples in the 21st Century: Using Integrative Systemic Therapy (IST) to Translate Science into Practice.

The complexity of the African American community in the United States continues to evolve. The growing number of professional African Americans who grew up in the postcivil rights era combined with the persistent reminders of inequity paints a complex backdrop for understanding African American relationships. The majority of our knowledge about African American couples disproportionately comes from nonclinical social science fields such as sociology and demography. Unfortunately, the scholarly literature on how to work with African American couples is relatively scant. This paper seeks to add to this limited literature by providing clinicians and scholars with a proposed set of issues to consider when conceptualizing and treating African American couples. In particular, the complexity and nuance needed to work with African American couples are best done by using an integrative model. Thus, this paper will discuss how the Integrative Systemic Therapy (IST) model is particularly well suited for working with African American couples. This paper will summarize the science on African American marriages with a focus on salient factors such as gender, SES, and trust, which will then be translated into clinical practice by utilizing a case example. The case example will be of a middle-class couple in order to delineate the challenges and the growing heterogeneity of African Americans. The article will conclude with a commentary on the evolving heterogeneity of African Americans, which sheds light on how an integrative perspective is important for disentangling and embracing the growing complexity of African American couples.

La complejidad de la comunidad afroamericana de los Estados Unidos continúa evolucionando. El número cada vez mayor de afroamericanos profesionales que crecieron en la era posterior a los derechos civiles combinado con los recordatorios constantes de inequidad pinta un telón de fondo complejo para comprender las relaciones afroamericanas. La mayoría de nuestro conocimiento acerca de las parejas afroamericanas proviene desproporcionadamente de ámbitos de las ciencias sociales no clínicas, como la sociología y la demografía. Desafortunadamente, la bibliografía científica sobre cómo trabajar con parejas afroamericanas es relativamente escasa. Este artículo tiene como finalidad incrementar esta bibliografía limitada proporcionando a los clínicos y a los académicos un conjunto de asuntos propuestos para tener en cuenta al conceptualizar y tratar a las parejas afroamericanas. En particular, la complejidad y los matices necesarios para trabajar con las parejas afroamericanas se logran mejor usando un modelo integrativo. Por lo tanto, en este artículo se debatirá cómo el modelo de terapia sistémica integrativa (TSI) (Pinsof et al., 2017) se adapta perfectamente para trabajar con parejas afroamericanas. En este artículo se resumirá la ciencia sobre los matrimonios afroamericanos haciendo hincapié en factores prominentes, como el género, el nivel socioeconómico y la confianza, que luego se trasladarán a la práctica clínica utilizando un caso ilustrativo. El caso ilustrativo será de una pareja de clase media a fin de describir los desafíos y la heterogeneidad creciente de los afroamericanos. El artículo concluye con un comentario sobre la creciente heterogeneidad de los afroamericanos, donde se aclara cómo una perspectiva integrativa es importante para desenmarañar y aceptar la complejidad creciente de las parejas afroamericanas.

Confirming, Validating, and Norming the Factor Structure of Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change Initial and Intersession.

UNLABELLED: Progress or feedback research tracks and feeds back client progress data throughout the course of psychotherapy. In the effort to empirically ground psychotherapeutic practice, feedback research is both a complement and alternative to empirically supported manualized treatments. Evidence suggests that tracking and feeding back progress data with individual or nonsystemic feedback systems improves outcomes in individual and couple therapy. The research reported in this article pertains to the STIC(®) (Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change)-the first client-report feedback system designed to empirically assess and track change within client systems from multisystemic and multidimensional perspectives in individual, couple, and family therapy. Clients complete the STIC Initial before the first session and the shorter STIC Intersession before every subsequent session. This study tested and its results supported the hypothesized factor structure of the six scales that comprise both STIC forms in a clinical outpatient sample and in a normal, random representative sample of the U.S. POPULATION: This study also tested the STIC's concurrent validity and found that its 6 scales and 40 of its 41 subscales differentiated the clinical and normal samples. Lastly, the study derived clinical cut-offs for each scale and subscale to determine whether and how much a client's score falls in the normal or clinical range. Beyond supporting the factorial and concurrent validity of both STIC forms, this research supported the reliabilities of the six scales (Omegahierarchical ) as well as the reliabilities of most subscales (alpha and rate-rerate). This article delineates clinical implications and directions for future research.

Research on the treatment of couple distress.

This article reviews the research on couple therapy over the last decade. The research shows that couple therapy positively impacts 70% of couples receiving treatment. The effectiveness rates of couple therapy are comparable to the effectiveness rates of individual therapies and vastly superior to control groups not receiving treatment. The relationship between couple distress and individual disorders such as depression and anxiety has become well established over the past decade. Research also indicates that couple therapy clearly has an important role in the treatment of many disorders. Findings over the decade have been especially promising for integrative behavioral couples therapy and emotion-focused therapy, which are two evidence-based treatments for couples. Research has also begun to identify moderators and mediators of change in couple therapy. Finally, a new and exciting line of research has focused on delineating the principles of change in couple therapy that transcends approach.

Assessing male batterers with the Personality Assessment Inventory.

In this study, we sought to provide empirical data on the utility of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991) for the assessment of male batterers. The sample consisted of 93 men who were court mandated to treatment. In the study, we were able to replicate 2 of 3 clusters (borderline/dysphoric and nonelevated) commonly found in the literature on male batterers; however, we only partially replicated the 3rd cluster (antisocial/narcissistic). This new finding may reflect a difference in the assessment instrument used to assess male batterers (i.e., PAI). In this study, we also investigated a previously understudied subgroup of batterers, specifically, men who engage in positive impression management. In this study, we conclude that the PAI is a potentially useful instrument in assessing male batterers and provide suggestions for future research.

Adolescent personality: a five-factor model construct validation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate convergent and discriminant validity of the five-factor model of adolescent personality in a school setting using three different raters (methods): self-ratings, peer ratings, and teacher ratings. The authors investigated validity through a multitrait-multimethod matrix and a confirmatory factor analysis correlated trait, uncorrelated method model. With the exception of Emotional Stability, each analysis demonstrated similar patterns and together provided support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the five-factor model structure of adolescent personality. However, among the three raters, self-ratings of personality provided a comparatively weaker method for assessing adolescent personality. The influences of agreement between self and other raters are discussed in relation to contrast, perceiver, and target effects; expert observer effects; the degree of acquaintanceship; and the effect of the social context.