[The French mesothelioma network from 1998 to 2013]. / Mésothéliome: les dispositifs en place en France « le réseau mésothéliome ¼ 1998-2013.

Mesothelioma is a rare disease less than 0.3% of cancers in France, very aggressive and resistant to the majority of conventional therapies. Asbestos exposure is nearly the only recognized cause of mesothelioma in men observed in 80% of case. In 1990, the projections based on mortality predicted a raise of incidence in mesothelioma for the next three decades. Nowadays, the diagnosis of this cancer is based on pathology, but the histological presentation frequently heterogeneous, is responsible for numerous pitfalls and major problems of early detection toward effective therapy. Facing such a diagnostic, epidemiological and medico-legal context, a national and international multidisciplinary network has been progressively set up in order to answer to epidemiological survey, translational or academic research questions. Moreover, in response to the action of the French Cancer Program (action 23.1) a network of pathologists was organized for expert pathological second opinion using a standardized procedure of certification for mesothelioma diagnosis. We describe the network organization and show the results during this last 15years period of time from 1998-2013. These results show the major impact on patient's management, and confirm the interest of this second opinion to provide accuracy of epidemiological data, quality of medico-legal acknowledgement and accuracy of clinical diagnostic for the benefit of patients. We also show the impact of these collaborative efforts for creating a high quality clinicobiological, epidemiological and therapeutic data collection for improvement of the knowledge of this dramatic disease.

Occupational and non-occupational attributable risk of asbestos exposure for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of pleural mesothelioma cases that can be attributed to asbestos exposure in France including non-occupational exposure. METHODS: A population-based case-control study including 437 incident cases and 874 controls was conducted from 1998 to 2002. Occupational and non-occupational asbestos exposure was assessed retrospectively by two expert hygienists. ORs of pleural mesothelioma for asbestos-exposed subjects compared to non-exposed subjects, and population-attributable risk (ARp) of asbestos exposure were estimated using a conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A clear dose-response relationship was observed between occupational asbestos exposure and pleural mesothelioma (OR=4.0 (99% CI 1.9 to 8.3) for men exposed at less than 0.1 f/mL-year vs. 67.0 (99% CI 25.6 to 175.1) for men exposed at more than 10 f/mL-year). The occupational asbestos ARp was 83.1% (99% CI 74.5% to 91.7%) for men and 41.7% (99% CI 25.3% to 58.0%) for women. A higher risk of pleural mesothelioma was observed in subjects non-occupationally exposed to asbestos compared to those never exposed. The non-occupational asbestos ARp for these subjects was 20.0% (99% CI -33.5% to 73.5%) in men and 38.7% (99% CI 8.4% to 69.0%) in women. When considering all kinds of asbestos exposure, ARp was 87.3% (99% CI 78.9% to 95.7%) for men and 64.8% (99% CI 45.4% to 84.3%) for women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the overall ARp in women is largely driven by non-occupational asbestos exposure arguing for the strong impact of such exposure in pleural mesothelioma occurrence. Considering the difficulty in assessing domestic or environmental asbestos exposure, this could explain the observed difference in ARp between men and women.

[The determinants of under-reporting occupational diseases. The case of mesothelioma]. / Les déterminants de la sous-déclaration des maladies professionnelles. Le cas du mésothéliome.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread press coverage of the harm caused by the asbestos, 40% of mesothelioma patients still do not file claims for compensation as an occupational disease. We aimed at studying elements that influence the administrative procedure of compensation, in particular social classes and instruction level. METHODS: This was a statistical analysis of data from the French national survey program of mesothelioma designed to understand social determinants of reporting occupational illness. Data from a give administrative district were then submitted to a qualitative study using in-depth interviews of patients with suspected mesothelioma. Discourse analysis was then applied to the corpus of information collected. Content analysis grouped the data into themes. RESULTS: The statistical analyses tended to show that the higher the educational level, the less often patients filed claims for their occupational disease. Manual workers asked for compensation for their disease more often than executives. The interviews conducted with suspected mesothelioma patients suggest several factors explaining these findings. The process of reporting an occupational disease is often initiated by the primary care physician who informs the patient about the possible link with a previous occupation, explains the procedure and motivate the patient whose main preoccupation is to fight against the illness, and less so to become recognized as a victim. In this context, the physician plays a fundamental role, independently of the patient's social status. CONCLUSION: Those results throw new light on the complexity of the administrative procedure for reporting occupational diseases in France and highlights possible causes of underdeclaration reporting. Physician awarness of these causes might improve identification of links between occupation and disease and the transmission of adapted information to all concerned patients in order to fight more effectively against the disparities resulting from underreporting.

Computed tomography findings in urban transportation workers with low cumulative asbestos exposure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of computed tomography (CT) scan pleural and interstitial changes in a population of urban transportation workers with low cumulative exposure to asbestos, and to measure inter-reader agreement. DESIGN: A total of 269 male volunteers (mean age 54.0 +/- 2.3 years, mean estimated cumulative exposure index 1.7 +/- 2.3 fibres/ml-years), underwent a CT scan which was read independently by three experienced readers, with further consensus reading in case of pleural or parenchymal abnormalities. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by means of Kappa statistic. RESULTS: On consensus reading, four subjects had interstitial opacities, three had diffuse pleural thickening and 26 (9.7%) had pleural plaques that were unilateral in 65% of cases and < or =2 mm thick in 54% of cases. No correlation was observed between pleural plaques and latency, duration of exposure or cumulative exposure. The inter-reader agreement for the detection of pleural abnormalities was fair. CONCLUSION: In this relatively young population with low cumulative exposure to asbestos, the prevalence of pleural abnormalities was low. These abnormalities were very limited in thickness and extent, leading to marked inter-reader variability and making it difficult to assess their relationship to asbestos exposure.

The French National Mesothelioma Surveillance Program.

OBJECTIVES: The French National Mesothelioma Surveillance Program (NMSP) was established in 1998 by the National Institute for Health Surveillance (InVS). Its objectives are to estimate the trends in mesothelioma incidence and the proportion attributable to occupational asbestos exposure, to help improve its pathology diagnosis, to assess its compensation as an occupational disease, and to contribute to research. METHODS: The NMSP records incident pleural tumours in 21 French districts that cover a population of approximately 16 million people (a quarter of the French population). A standardised procedure of pathological and clinical diagnosis ascertainment is used. Lifetime exposure to asbestos and to other factors (man made mineral fibres, ionising radiation, SV40 virus) is reconstructed, and a case-control study was also conducted. The proportion of mesothelioma compensated as an occupational disease was assessed. RESULTS: Depending on the hypothesis, the estimated number of incident cases in 1998 ranged from 660 to 761 (women: 127 to 146; men: 533 to 615). Among men, the industries with the highest risks of mesothelioma are construction and ship repair, asbestos industry, and manufacture of metal construction materials; the occupations at highest risk are plumbers, pipe-fitters, and sheet-metal workers. The attributable risk fraction for occupational asbestos exposure in men was 83.2% (95% CI 76.8 to 89.6). The initial pathologist's diagnosis was confirmed in 67% of cases, ruled out in 13%, and left uncertain in the others; for half of the latter, the clinical findings supported a mesothelioma diagnosis. In all, 62% applied for designation of an occupational disease, and 91% of these were receiving workers' compensation. CONCLUSIONS: The NMSP is a large scale epidemiological surveillance system with several original aspects, providing important information to improve the knowledge of malignant pleural mesothelioma, such as monitoring the evolution of its incidence, of high risk occupations and economic sectors, and improving pathology techniques.

Pleural mesothelioma: a descriptive analysis based on a case-control study and mortality data in Ile de France, 1987-1990.

Incidence rates of pleural mesothelioma in Ile de France were examined for the period 1987-1990, on the basis of information collected in a case-control study. This study was designed to include all new cases of pleural mesothelioma occurring in the region. On the other hand, mortality rates from pleural malignancies in the same region were examined on the basis of death certificates recorded by INSERM for the same period. A large difference was found between the two types of data. Average annual incidence rates were 7.5 per million among men and 1.6 per million among women. Average annual mortality rates due to primary pleural malignancies were 25.2 per million in males and 8.9 per million in females. This study confirms discordances between incidence and mortality data for pleural malignancies already reported in several countries. However, contrasting with some previous reports, the annual mortality rate from pleural malignancies was higher than the incidence rate of mesothelioma in this study. This emphasizes the usefulness of a specific investigation to explain such discordances, prior to comparison of data from one country to another.

Pleural mesothelioma and exposure to asbestos: evaluation from work histories and analysis of asbestos bodies in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or lung tissue in 131 patients.

Exposure to asbestos was evaluated in 131 patients with pleural malignant mesothelioma in the Paris area between 1986 and 1992 using data from a detailed specific questionnaire and light microscopy analysis of the retention of asbestos bodies in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or lung tissue. Probable or definite exposure to significant levels of asbestos dust was identified in only 48 (36.6%) subjects, and significant asbestos body counts (above 1 asbestos body/ml in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or 1000 asbestos bodies/g of dry lung tissue) were found in only 45 (34.3%) subjects. Overall 50 subjects had experienced exposure to only low levels of asbestos or no exposure at all and showed no significant retention of asbestos bodies in the biological sample analysed. Previous studies have shown that light microscopy may be useful in the identification of subjects with previous exposure to asbestos. In this study, apart from cases with obvious exposure to asbestos, a large group of subjects seemed to have a history of exposure or lung retention of asbestos bodies suggestive of very low levels of cumulative exposure, similar to those described in the general population.