Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Microbiol ; 51(1-2): 1-9, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8828117

ABSTRACT

Quality control (QC) procedures for antigen detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for hog cholera (HC) virus, foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus, and an antibody detection ELISA for FMD virus were established at a regional veterinary laboratory in northern Thailand. A recently developed computer software package, QCEL, was used to facilitate management and analysis of QC data. The program was used to assess test performance by producing Shewhart-CUSUM control charts which monitored control data for unacceptable fluctuations or trends. QCEL-generated control charts and analyses are presented and discussed. The use of a simple integrated computerised system for storage and analysis of QC control data provided the laboratory with the opportunity to achieve increased confidence in the results of tests performed.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Aphthovirus/immunology , Cattle Diseases/immunology , Classical Swine Fever Virus/immunology , Classical Swine Fever/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/immunology , Laboratories/standards , Veterinary Medicine , Animals , Cattle , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Quality Control , Software , Swine
2.
Rev Sci Tech ; 14(3): 567-75, 1995 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8593391

ABSTRACT

The authors describe a questionnaire survey of foot and mouth disease (FMD) and of FMD control by vaccination in sixty villages in northern Thailand. FMD was found to be common, with 90% of the villages surveyed reporting one or more outbreaks in the five years prior to interview, and 28% of villages reporting outbreaks every year. Outbreaks were more common in the wet season (June to September) and most outbreaks lasted for four weeks or less. The common sources of the most recent outbreak were the introduction of infected cattle and buffalo from a public market or surrounding village (25 of 60 cases), and commingling of cattle and buffalo with those of an infected neighbouring village (24/60). FMD was not perceived to be a major animal health problem, and there was substantial variation between villages in the percentage of animals vaccinated. The main reasons for not vaccinating were the fear that vaccination caused abortion, and the fact that animals were difficult to assemble for vaccination. It was concluded that vaccination cover needs to be raised significantly if FMD is to be effectively controlled.


Subject(s)
Buffaloes , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Vaccination/veterinary , Abortion, Veterinary/epidemiology , Abortion, Veterinary/prevention & control , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Thailand/epidemiology
3.
Aust Vet J ; 72(4): 142-4, 1995 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7646379

ABSTRACT

A study was undertaken in northern Thailand to examine the involvement of pigs in outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Data were collected by surveying selected villages, by serological monitoring of pigs and by investigating outbreaks. Fifty-three of 58 villages (91%) surveyed reported that pigs did not develop FMD during the most recent outbreak. The source of 49/60 (82%) outbreaks was attributed to either recent purchases of infected cattle and buffalo or commingling of cattle and buffalo with stock from an infected neighbouring village. One of 60 villages (1.7%) reported that the source was introduced infected pigs. There was no association between the various hypothesised risk factors relating to the management of pigs and the frequency of FMD outbreaks in the survey. The percentage of seropositive pigs during 3 rounds of serological monitoring conducted at 6-monthly intervals in selected villages was 3.5%, 2.6% and 0%, respectively. No clinically affected pigs were observed in 11 outbreak investigations. It was concluded that pigs did not commonly become infected when there were outbreaks of FMD in village cattle and buffalo in northern Thailand. This was probably due to the pig feeding and housing practices employed by villagers that protected pigs from exposure to virus from infected cattle or buffalo, or their products.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Aphthovirus/classification , Aphthovirus/immunology , Aphthovirus/isolation & purification , Cattle , Cross-Sectional Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Serotyping/veterinary , Swine , Thailand/epidemiology
4.
Aust Vet J ; 72(1): 21-4, 1995 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8787521

ABSTRACT

An outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease that spread between two related vaccinated dairy herds was investigated. Although the cattle were of similar vaccination status, in one herd there was high morbidity, whereas in the other there was considerably lower morbidity. The relationship between the vaccine virus and the outbreak virus was expressed as an r value determined by the two-dimensional neutralisation test. Bovine serum homologous to the vaccine virus indicated a close antigenic relationship between the vaccine virus and the outbreak virus (r = 0.61). The source of the outbreak virus was not determined. The investigation suggested a requirement for close contact between stock for foot-and-mouth disease to spread in a tropical environment, in contrast to the capacity of the disease to spread considerable distances by aerosol transmission in temperate climates.


Subject(s)
Aphthovirus/immunology , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/immunology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/virology , Female , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/immunology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Male , Thailand/epidemiology , Treatment Failure
5.
Vet Microbiol ; 18(3-4): 273-83, 1988 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2852874

ABSTRACT

A single dilution blocking ELISA was developed and evaluated for measuring serum antibody to foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Basic parameters of the assay were established and a positive-negative threshold determined from testing 176 specific antibody negative sera from Australian cattle. Sera collected from immunised animals in Thailand were tested by ELISA and virus-neutralisation (VN) tests and the results compared. A positive correlation between ELISA and VN titres was recorded for each of the 3 FMDV serotypes endemic in Thailand, with the overall correlation coefficient being r = 0.8990. A positive correlation for each of the serotypes was also found between ELISA titre and the degree of blocking (percentage inhibition) of each test serum at a dilution of 1:16, with the overall correlation being r = 0.8704. This simplified ELISA was sensitive, specific and gave reproducible results, and had the potential to test quickly and efficiently a considerable number of sera.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Aphthovirus/immunology , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Aphthovirus/isolation & purification , Cattle , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Reference Values , Thailand
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...