Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 29(1): e58-e66, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of patients treated with coagulation disorders, and more specifically with anticoagulant therapy, has increased worldwide in recent years due to increased life expectancy in developed countries. The protocols for managing this type of patient in oral surgery has varied over recent years, especially after the appearance of new direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The assessment of risk of bleeding in this type of patient when undergoing a surgical procedure continues to be a controversial issue for patients, dentists and general practitioners. The objective of this document is to offer recommendations, based on evidence, for decision making for patients with coagulopathies who require dental surgical intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on the indications of the "Preparation of Clinical Practice guidelines in the National Health System. Methodological manual", we gathered a group of experts who agreed on 15 PICO questions based on managing patients with coagulation disorders in dental surgical procedures, such as fitting of implants or dental extractions. RESULTS: The 15 PICO questions were answered based on the available evidence, being limited in most cases due to the lack of a control group. Two of the PICO questions were answered by the experts with a grade C recommendation, while the rest were answered with grade D. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review highlight the need to undertake well designed clinical trials with control groups and with a representative sample size.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , Oral Surgical Procedures , Surgery, Oral , Humans , Blood Coagulation Disorders/complications , Blood Coagulation Disorders/chemically induced , Anticoagulants
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 50(10): 1271-1279, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602650

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in T1/T2-N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A systematic review of the literature on SLNB until March 2019 was conducted. The review was organized according to the PRISMA protocol, considering the following PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) question: What is the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in OSCC? 'P' was patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma T1/2-N0; 'I' was SLNB; 'C' was neck treated with elective neck dissection and haematoxylin-eosin histopathology; 'O' was sensitivity and specificity. A meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed on the selected studies. The sensitivity of SLNB was up to 88% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72-96%) and specificity was up to 99% (95% CI 96-100%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00). In the four studies where immunohistochemistry was performed, both the sensitivity and specificity were higher than in the studies without immunohistochemistry: 93% (95% CI 88-97%) and 98% (95% CI 96-100%), respectively. In conclusion, SLNB is an effective technique for treating patients with some types of stage T1/2-N0 OSCC. Some parameters such as immunohistochemistry could determine the level of diagnostic accuracy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
3.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 25(4): e508-e515, 2020 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388523

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study is to examine the quality of the information available for patients online with regards to the apicoectomy surgical procedure, both on general and critically selected websites. The hypothesis is that general websites has less quality than other that have been pre-selected. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search for the English term "apicoectomy" was performed online. The first 100 websites that appeared in both Google and Yahoo were analysed. Seven validated instruments were used for these two dimensions: quality (DISCERN, JAMA and EQIP), and readability (FRES, Fog Scale, FKRGL and SMOG). RESULTS: A total of 21 websites (10.5%) were selected. The readability of the websites in both groups was difficult or very difficult. With regards to the quality of the websites, the DISCERN instrument indicated an average value of 2.28 [2.14-2.39] for all of the websites, therefore indicating very low quality with serious defects; however, in the selected websites, the average quality was 3.16 [2.84-3.48], indicating potential, but not serious defects (p<0.001). There were statistically significant differences for the FRES values (p = 0.030), with a greater readability in the selected group of websites. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that it is very important for the population to become aware of and learn how to use certain exclusion criteria when selecting medical consultation websites, as in doing so, they will be able to obtain a higher quality of information from these websites.


Subject(s)
Comprehension , Consumer Health Information , Humans , Internet , Referral and Consultation
4.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 25(3): e318-e325, 2020 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relation between periodontal disease and systemic pathologies is still not widespread among general practitioners. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether or not periodontal radiological diagnosis can aid the detection of blood alterations associated with acquired systemic diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross sectional study. All of the participants underwent a panoramic radiograph and a complete blood test. Morphological bone loss was considered as positive in those patients who showed radiographically more than 1 tooth with bone loss greater than or equal to the middle third of the root. The statistical analysis was performed by comparing the variables using the ANOVA or U-Mann-Whitney tests for independent samples with normal conditions. The correlation coefficient was analysed using the Pearson test. RESULTS: 239 patients were included in our study (96 men and 143 women) with an average age of 64.40 years. 59.04% of the patients were determined as morphological bone loss positive and had on average 4 teeth less than negative patients (p <0.0001). Also the average platelet levels in positive patients were lower (p = 0.024) and mean levels of HBA1c (p = 0.009) were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Morphological bone loss parameter can be useful both for dentists and general practitioners to refer, subsequently, to periodontal specialist.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Alveolar Process , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin , Hematologic Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...