Basic processes and clinical applications of mental imagery in worry: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesise existing research on the phenomenology of mental imagery among high worriers compared to healthy individuals, and to characterise the nature and effectiveness of existing imagery-related interventions in treatment of worry. METHODS: PsycInfo, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Medline, Medline Epub, and PubMed were searched for studies examining the relationship between worry/GAD and mental imagery, or interventions using imagery in treatment of worry/GAD. We assessed study quality and used qualitative narrative synthesis to comprehensively map study results. RESULTS: The search yielded 2589 abstracts that were assessed for eligibility independently by two authors. From this, 183 full texts were screened and 50 qualitatively synthesised. Twenty-seven reported an association between worry/GAD and an aspect of mental imagery. Here, overactive negative and worry imagery, and diminished positive future imagining, were associated with worry/GAD. Twenty-three studies reported an intervention. This literature suggested mixed findings regarding efficacy, including for imaginal exposure as an independent technique for GAD. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support dysfunctional negative imagining and diminished positive prospective imagery in GAD. General imagining abilities remain intact, which is promising for efforts to utilise imagery in treatment. Further research is warranted to develop innovative clinical applications of imagery in treatment of GAD.

How technology can enhance treatment: A scoping review of clinical interventions for anxiety and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Researchers are increasingly investigating how technology could be used to improve the efficacy of treatment for anxiety and obsessive-compulsive (OC) spectrum disorders. A broad range of technologies, disorders and therapeutic processes have been examined in the literature. This review summarizes the evidence for using technology in clinical interventions for anxiety and OC-spectrum disorders and highlights research gaps that should be addressed to improve the evidence base. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted based on systematic searches of three databases. Broadly, the criteria included interventions that had integrated technology into clinical contexts to enhance treatment for anxiety and OC-spectrum disorders. All records were double-screened by two reviewers, and data were extracted on the characteristics of interventions, symptom outcomes, and implementation factors. RESULTS: Searches returned 2,475 studies, of which 117 were eligible for inclusion in this review. Although almost all studies reported pre-post-symptom reductions, only one quarter of the controlled studies demonstrated additive effect of technology-based interventions in between-group analyses. We noted a trend in underreporting implementation factors. CONCLUSIONS: Technology-based interventions can improve the efficacy of treatment for anxiety and OC-spectrum disorders, but there are challenges to achieving this goal. Based on a review of the included studies, we provide four specific recommendations to improve the quality and likelihood of success of future research projects. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Technology-based adjuvants are unlikely to improve the efficacy of treatment for anxiety or OC-spectrum disorders based on their novelty or convenience alone. A subset of studies gives hope that specific innovations can improve treatment when targeting a therapeutic process that has been problematic. Clinicians seeking to improve the efficacy of their treatment should first define client-specific therapeutic factors (e.g., homework compliance) that could be leveraged, then apply a specific innovation to address this factor.

Excessive reassurance seeking versus compulsive checking in OCD: Comparing implicit motivators and mechanisms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Excessive reassurance seeking (ERS) in OCD increases following scenarios with high threat and personal responsibility, but the mechanism via which ERS addresses these concerns is unclear. We investigated whether reassurance following OCD-related threats facilitated temporary threat re-appraisal and/or transferred responsibility to others. We also examined the 'checking by proxy' theory of OCD ERS by comparing the functional mechanisms of reassurance and checking behaviour. METHODS: Community participants (N = 398) were recruited through MTurk and randomised to one of four conditions: ambiguous object-derived (checking) information, ambiguous person-derived (reassurance) information, unambiguous object-derived information and unambiguous person-derived information. Participants read scenarios that conveyed a risk of harm or contamination before imagining receiving reassurance or checking information as per their condition. Ratings of personal and external responsibility, threat likelihood and uncertainty were made before and after receiving the information. RESULTS: In support of a checking by proxy hypothesis of ERS, participants in the unambiguous information conditions reported decreased uncertainty, decreased estimated threat likelihood and increased responsibility of others, regardless of whether they imagined checking or receiving reassurance. Those in the ambiguous conditions reported no changes in threat estimation or responsibility beliefs. OCD symptom level moderated responses to ambiguity: unlike low OCD, high OCD participants did not respond differentially to ambiguous versus unambiguous reassurance. LIMITATIONS: The study was performed online due to Covid-19 restrictions and utilised non-clinical participants. CONCLUSIONS: Like checking, reassurance facilitates short-term threat re-appraisal and diffuses responsibility following obsessive threats. Differentiated responses to reassurance ambiguity disappear as OC symptoms increase.