Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI: What Neuro-Oncology Clinicians Need To Know.

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a relatively novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with an image contrast designed for in vivo measurement of certain endogenous molecules with protons that are exchangeable with water protons, such as amide proton transfer commonly used for neuro-oncology applications. Recent technological advances have made it feasible to implement CEST on clinical grade scanners within practical acquisition times, creating new opportunities to integrate CEST in clinical workflow. In addition, the majority of CEST applications used in neuro-oncology are performed without the use gadolinium-based contrast agents which are another appealing feature of this technique. This review is written for clinicians involved in neuro-oncologic care (nonphysicists) as the target audience explaining what they need to know as CEST makes its way into practice. The purpose of this article is to (1) review the basic physics and technical principles of CEST MRI, and (2) review the practical applications of CEST in neuro-oncology.

Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis.

Background and Purpose: To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradiation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective matched cohort of 22 wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and 22 mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients were matched by sex, extent of resection, and corpus callosum involvement. The recurrent gross tumor volume was compared to the original gross tumor volume and clinical target volume contours from radiotherapy planning. Failure patterns were quantified by the incidence and volume of the recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, and positional differences of the recurrent gross tumor volume centroid from the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume. Results: The gross tumor volume was smaller for wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase patients compared to the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase cohort (mean ± SD: 46.5 ± 26.0 cm3 vs 72.2 ± 45.4 cm3, P = .026). The recurrent gross tumor volume was 10.7 ± 26.9 cm3 and 46.9 ± 55.0 cm3 smaller than the gross tumor volume for the same groups (P = .018). The recurrent gross tumor volume extended outside the gross tumor volume in 22 (100%) and 15 (68%) (P= .009) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively; however, the volume of recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume was not significantly different (12.4 ± 16.1 cm3 vs 8.4 ± 14.2 cm3, P = .443). The recurrent gross tumor volume centroid was within 5.7 mm of the closest gross tumor volume edge for 21 (95%) and 22 (100%) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively. Conclusion: The recurrent gross tumor volume extended beyond the gross tumor volume less often in mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients possibly implying a differential response to chemoradiotherapy and suggesting isocitrate dehydrogenase status might be used to personalize radiotherapy. The results require validation in prospective randomized trials.

The Initial Step Towards Establishing a Quantitative, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Framework for Response Assessment of Spinal Metastases After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: There are no established threshold values regarding the degree of growth on imaging when assessing response of spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). OBJECTIVE: To determine a magnetic resonance imaging-based minimum detectable difference (MDD) in gross tumor volume (GTV) and its association with 1-yr radiation site-specific (RSS) progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: GTVs at baseline and first 2 post-SBRT scans (Post1 and Post2, respectively) for 142 spinal segments were contoured, and percentage volume change between scans calculated. One-year RSS PFS was acquired from medical records. The MDD was determined. The MDD was compared against optimal thresholds of GTV changes associated with 1-yr RSS PFS using Youden's J index, and receiver operating characteristic curves between timepoints compared to determine which timeframe had the best association. RESULTS: A total of 17 of the 142 segments demonstrated progression. The MDD was 10.9%. Baseline-Post2 demonstrated the best performance (area under the curve [AUC] 0.90). Only Baseline-Post2 had an optimal threshold > MDD at 14.7%. Due to large distribution of GTVs, volumes were split into tertiles. Small tumors (GTV < 2 cc) had optimal thresholds of 42.0%, 71.3%, and 37.2% at Baseline-Post1 (AUC 0.81), Baseline-Post2 (AUC 0.89), and Post1-Post2 (AUC 0.77), respectively. Medium tumors (2 ≤ GTV ≤ 8.3 cc) all demonstrated optimal thresholds < MDD, with AUCs ranging from 0.65 to 0.84. Large tumors (GTV > 8.3 cc) had 2 timepoints where optimal thresholds > MDD: Baseline-Post2 (13.3%; AUC 0.97) and Post1-Post2 (11.8%; AUC 0.66). Baseline-Post2 had the best association with RSS PFS for all tertiles. CONCLUSION: Given a MDD of 10.9%, for small GTVs, larger (>37%) changes were required before local failure could be determined, compared to 11% to 13% for medium/large tumors.

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling of diffusion MRI during chemoradiation predicts therapeutic response in IDH wildtype glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of early progression in glioblastoma may provide an opportunity to personalize treatment. Simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI offers quantitative estimates of diffusion and perfusion metrics. We investigated whether these metrics, during chemoradiation, could predict treatment outcome. METHODS: 38 patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma undergoing 6-week/30-fraction chemoradiation had standardized post-operative MRIs at baseline (radiation planning), and at the 10th and 20th fractions. Non-overlapping T1-enhancing (T1C) and non-enhancing T2-FLAIR hyperintense regions were independently segmented. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCT1C, ADCT2-FLAIR) and perfusion fraction (fT1C, fT2-FLAIR) maps were generated with simplified IVIM modelling. Parameters associated with progression before or after 6.9 months (early vs late progression, respectively), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were investigated. RESULTS: Higher ADCT2-FLAIR at baseline [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.15, p = 0.025], lower fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.04-4.27, p = 0.018), and lack of increase in ADCT2-FLAIR at fraction 20 compared to baseline (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.22, p = 0.02) were associated with early progression. Combining ADCT2-FLAIR at baseline, fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10, ECOG and MGMT promoter methylation status significantly improved AUC to 90.3% compared to a model with only ECOG and MGMT promoter methylation status (p = 0.001). Using multivariable analysis, neither IVIM metrics were associated with OS but higher fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.95, p = 0.018) was associated with longer PFS. CONCLUSION: ADCT2-FLAIR at baseline, its lack of increase from baseline to fraction 20, or fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 significantly predicted early progression. fT2-FLAIR at fraction 10 was associated with PFS.

Quantitative CEST and MT at 1.5T for monitoring treatment response in glioblastoma: early and late tumor progression during chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) was performed using a 1.5T protocol that includes a novel chemical exchange saturation transfer/magnetization transfer (CEST/MT) approach. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine if qMRI metrics at baseline, at the 10th and 20th fraction during a 30 fraction/6 week standard chemoradiation (CRT) schedule, and at 1 month following treatment could be an early indicator of response for glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: The study included 51 newly diagnosed GBM patients. Four regions-of-interest (ROI) were analyzed: (i) the radiation defined clinical target volume (CTV), (ii) radiation defined gross tumor volume (GTV), (iii) enhancing-tumor regions, and (iv) FLAIR-hyperintense regions. Quantitative CEST, MT, T1 and T2 parameters were compared between those patients progressing within 6.9 months (early), and those progressing after CRT (late), using mixed modelling. Exploratory predictive modelling was performed to identify significant predictors of early progression using a multivariable LASSO model. RESULTS: Results were dependent on the specific tumor ROI analyzed and the imaging time point. The baseline CEST asymmetry within the CTV was significantly higher in the early progression cohort. Other significant predictors included the T2 of the MT pools (for semi-solid at fraction 20 and water at 1 month after CRT), the exchange rate (at fraction 20) and the MGMT methylation status. CONCLUSIONS: We observe the potential for multiparametric qMRI, including a novel pulsed CEST/MT approach, to show potential in distinguishing early from late progression GBM cohorts. Ultimately, the goal is to personalize therapeutic decisions and treatment adaptation based on non-invasive imaging-based biomarkers.