Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Diabet Med ; 33(10): 1427-36, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26433212

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess whether a structured diabetes education programme, the Patient Empowerment Programme, was associated with a lower rate of all-cause hospitalization and emergency department visits in a population-based cohort of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care. METHODS: A cohort of 24 250 patients was evaluated using a linked administrative database during 2009-2013. We selected 12 125 patients with Type 2 diabetes who had at least one Patient Empowerment Programme session attendance. Patients who did not participate in the Patient Empowerment Programme were matched one-to-one with patients who did, using the propensity score method. Hospitalization events and emergency department visits were the events of interest. Cox proportional hazard and negative binomial regressions were performed to estimate the hazard ratios for the initial event, and incidence rate ratios for the number of events. RESULTS: During a median 30.5 months of follow-up, participants in the Patient Empowerment Programme had a lower incidence of an initial hospitalization event (22.1 vs 25.2%; hazard ratio 0.879; P < 0.001) and emergency department visit (40.5 vs 44%; hazard ratio 0.901; P < 0.001) than those who did not participate in the Patient Empowerment Programme. Participation in the Patient Empowerment Programme was associated with a significantly lower number of emergency department visits (incidence rate ratio 0.903; P < 0.001): 40.4 visits per 100 patients annually in those who did not participate in the Patient Empowerment Programme vs. 36.2 per 100 patients annually in those who did. There were significantly fewer hospitalization episodes (incidence rate ratio 0.854; P < 0.001): 20.0 hospitalizations per 100 patients annually in those who did not participate in the Patient Empowerment Programme vs. 16.9 hospitalizations per 100 patients annually in those who did. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with Type 2 diabetes, the Patient Empowerment Programme was shown to be effective in delaying the initial hospitalization event and in reducing their frequency.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Patient Participation , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Patient Participation/methods , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 17(2): 128-35, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25251664

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess whether a structured diabetes education programme, the Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP), was associated with a lower risk of first cardiovascular disease (CVD) event and all-cause mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care. METHODS: A Chinese cohort of 27 278 patients with T2DM and without previous CVD events on or before the baseline study recruitment date was linked to the Hong Kong administrative database from 2008 to 2013. The PEP was provided to patients with T2DM treated at primary care outpatient clinics through community trained professional educators. PEP non-participants were matched one-to-one with the PEP participants using a propensity score method with respect to their baseline covariates. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to estimate the associations of the PEP with the occurrence of first CVD event, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure and death from any cause, controlling for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: During a median of 21.5 months follow-up, 795 (352 PEP participants and 443 PEP non-participants) patients experienced a first CVD event. After adjusting for confounding variables, PEP participants had a lower rate of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.564, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.445-0.715; p < 0.001], first CVD (HR 0.807, 95% CI 0.696-0.935; p = 0.004) and stroke (HR 0.702; 95% CI 0.569-0.867; p = 0.001) than those without PEP. CONCLUSIONS: Enrolment in the PEP was associated with lower all-cause mortality and a lower number of first CVD events among patients with T2DM. The CVD benefit of PEP might be attributable to improving metabolic control through empowerment of self-care and the enhancement of quality of diabetes care in primary care.


Subject(s)
Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Angiopathies/prevention & control , Patient Participation , Primary Health Care , Self Care , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Follow-Up Studies , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Program Evaluation , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors
5.
Bone ; 37(3): 420-4, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15993669

ABSTRACT

During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Hong Kong in 2003, patients were treated with very high doses of corticosteroid and ribavirin. The detrimental effects of such treatment on the bone mineral density (BMD) of SARS patients are unknown. To compare the BMD of SARS patients with normal range data, a cross-sectional survey was conducted. The bone mineral density of 224 patients with SARS, who were treated with an average of 2753 mg (SD = 2152 mg) prednisolone and 29,344 mg (SD = 15,849 mg) of ribavirin was compared to normal data. Six percent of men had a hip BMD Z score of < or =-2 (P = 0.057 for testing the hypothesis that >2.5% of subjects should have a Z score of < or =-2). Moreover, there was a negative association (r = -0.25, P = 0.023) between the duration of steroid therapy and BMD in men. We conclude that male SARS patients had lower BMD at the hip than normal controls, and this could be attributed to prolonged steroid therapy.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/physiology , Bone and Bones/pathology , Bone and Bones/physiopathology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/pathology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/physiopathology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL