Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(4): e006034, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29654119

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Durable polymers used in drug-eluting stents are considered a potential cause of hypersensitivity inflammatory response adversely affecting stent healing. Using a sequential follow-up with optical coherence tomography, we compared the differences in healing profiles of 2 drug-eluting stents with a biodegradable or durable polymer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with multivessel disease were prospectively enrolled to receive both study stents, which were randomly assigned to 2 individual vessels, a Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent with a durable BioLinx polymer and a BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent with a biodegradable polylactic acid polymer. Optical coherence tomography was performed at baseline, then in 5 randomly assigned monthly groups at 2 to 6 months, and at 9 months in all patients. The primary end point was the difference in optical coherence tomography strut coverage at 9 months. Key secondary end points included angiographic late lumen loss and composite major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis) at 9 months. Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent showed significantly better strut coverage than BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent at 2 to 6 months (P<0.001) and less variance of percent coverage at 9 months, 99.7% (interquartile range, 99.1-100) versus 99.6% (interquartile range, 96.8-99.9; difference, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-1.05; P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in major adverse cardiac events or angiographic end points. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a durable polymer, Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent exhibited better strut coverage than BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent having a biodegradable polymer; both showed similar antiproliferative efficacy. This novel, longitudinal, sequential optical coherence tomography protocol using each patient as own control could achieve conclusive results in small sample size. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01742507.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Drug-Eluting Stents , Neointima , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Aged , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/etiology , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 78(6): 898-908, 2011 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21805593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A first-in-man evaluation of the safety, feasibility, deliverability, and efficacy of the new Medtronic S9 (Integrity) bare metal stent (BMS) in complex coronary diseases. BACKGROUND: Excellent deliverability remains an unmet clinical need among stents especially in complex lesions. The S9 (Integrity) BMS utilizes a new, continuous sinusoidal manufacturing technology to enhance stent flexibility and deliverability, without sacrificing radial strength. METHODS: This is a first-in-man, open label observational study in 15 patients treated with S9 (Integrity) BMS. Device success during implantation, clinical outcomes, 30-day and 12-month device-oriented and patient-oriented composite efficacy end-points, and 16-month angiographic restudy were evaluated (with amended protocols). RESULTS: Thirty-four stents were deployed to treat 30 complex lesions. Mean lesion length was 22.93 ± 11.78 mm, and mean percentage diameter stenosis was 78.59% ± 9.01%. Mean stent delivery time was 125 ± 68.3 sec. Acute device, lesion, and procedure success, as defined, were 100%. Device-oriented and patient-oriented composite end-points were zero at 30 days. Two patients had ischemic driven revascularization before 12 months. One patient had non-cardiac death at 13 months; all remaining 12 patients received 16 months angiographic restudy and only one had angiographic restenosis. The mean diameter of stenosis was 27.0% ± 18.3%, and mean late loss was 0.73 ± 0.50 mm. Total target vessel failure rate was 21.4% (3/14) at 16 months. CONCLUSION: The new S9 (Integrity) BMS exhibited excellent deliverability, flexibility, and conformability, contributing to good acute and 16 months outcomes in complex cases.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/etiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Metals , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...