Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/methods , Bile Duct Neoplasms , Hepatectomy/methods , Jejunostomy/methods , Papilloma , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/physiopathology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Humans , Liver Function Tests/methods , Male , Papilloma/pathology , Papilloma/physiopathology , Papilloma/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Mirizzi syndrome is an uncommon cause of common hepatic duct obstruction resulting from gallstone impaction in the cystic duct or gallbladder neck. Mirizzi syndrome is traditionally considered as a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery mainly due to risk of bile duct injury during dissection. We present the surgical experience of 5 patients with Mirizzi syndrome who were diagnosed preoperatively and managed using minimally access surgical technique, either total laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. All patients had successful operations and recovered without complications. We concluded that with a correct preoperative diagnosis, careful operative strategy, increasing expertise with laparoscopic technique, and introduction of robotic surgical system, minimally invasive approach of management of Mirizzi syndrome becomes safe and feasible.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Mirizzi Syndrome/surgery , Robotics/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Mirizzi Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Care/methods , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: From November 2009 to August 2010, 51 patients with symptomatic gallstone or gallbladder polyps were randomized to SILC (n = 24) or 4-port LC (n = 27). RESULTS: Mean surgical time (43.5 vs 46.5 min), median blood loss (1 vs 1 mL) and mean hospital stay (1.5 vs 1.8 d) were similar for both the SILC and 4-port LC group. There were no open conversions and no major complications. The mean total wound length of the SILC group was significantly shorter (1.76 vs 2.25 cm). The median visual analogue pain score at 6 hours after surgery was similar (4.5 vs 4.0) but the SILC group had a significantly worse pain score on day 7 (1 vs 0). There was no difference in time to resume usual activity (mean, 5.6 vs 5.0 d). The median cosmetic score of SILC was significantly higher than at 3 months after surgery (7 vs 6). CONCLUSIONS: SILC was feasible and safe for properly selected patients in experienced hands.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Cholecystolithiasis/surgery , Gallbladder Diseases/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Polyps/surgery , Adult , Aged , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/trends , Esthetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Research Design , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has emerged as one of the most promising surgical advances since its launch at the turn of the millennium. Despite its worldwide acceptance in many different surgical specialties, the use of robotic assistance in the field of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) surgery remains relatively unexplored. This article aims to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of robotic HBP surgery in a single surgical center. METHODS: Between May 2009 and December 2010, all patients admitted to our unit for robotic HBP surgery were evaluated. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on clinical outcomes was performed. RESULTS: There were 55 robotic HBP operations performed during the study period. There were 27 robotic liver resections (left lateral sectionectomies n = 17, left hepatectomy n = 1, other segmentectomies n = 2 and wedge resections n = 7), 12 robotic pancreatic procedures (Whipple's operations n = 8, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies n = 2, double bypass n = 1 and cystojejunostomy n = 1) and 16 biliary procedures (biliary enteric bypass n = 9, bile duct exploration and related procedures n = 7). The median postoperative hospital stays for robotic liver resections, biliary procedures and pancreatic operations were 5.5 days (range 3-11 days), 6 days (range 4-11 days) and 12 days (range 6-21 days), respectively. Morbidities for liver resection, biliary procedures and pancreatic operations were 7.4, 18 and 33%, respectively. There was no mortality in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery is feasible and can be safely performed in patients with complicated HBP pathologies. Further evaluation with clinical trials is required to validate its real benefits.
