Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prevalence and outcome of asynclitism in the second stage of labor in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study involving 92 term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor, recruited from December 2019 to December 2020. Transperineal ultrasound was performed and asynclitism was diagnosed if there was asymmetry of intracranial structures on the transverse plane. To assess the fetal head station, the head perineum distance was measured at rest and on pushing, and the mode of delivery was recorded. Relationship between asynclitism and fetal head position, and between head perineum distance and the mode of delivery, were evaluated with chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The prevalence of asynclitism was 15% (14 of 92), of which 12 were anterior asynclitism and 2 were posterior asynclitism. The prevalence of asynclitism was less common in occiput anterior compared with nonocciput anterior position (6.7% vs 53%, P<.01). Women with asynclitism were associated with smaller delta head perineum distance (head perineum distance at rest minus that at pushing) than women without asynclitism (median [interquartile range], 0.68 cm [0.85 cm] vs 0.91 cm [0.71 cm]; P=.01). Eventually, there was a trend of more operative deliveries in women with asynclitism (43%, or 6 of 14 women) than in women without asynclitism (27%, or 21 of 78 women), although this difference was not statistically significant (P=.22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of asynclitism at transperineal ultrasound was rather common in nulliparous women at second stage of labor and seemed more commonly associated with nonocciput anterior position.

Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the angle of progression (AoP) measured by transperineal ultrasonography before indicating an instrumental delivery or cesarean delivery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among women with singleton term pregnancies with prolonged second stage of labor at Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China, between May 16, 2011, and May 25, 2016. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasonography were performed to determine fetal head position and AoP, respectively, both at rest and during uterine contraction with pushing. Mode of delivery was decided after vaginal examination without relying on ultrasonography. RESULTS: Of 143 women, 116 underwent successful instrumental delivery and 27 underwent cesarean delivery. Median AoP was 153.0° in the instrumental group versus 139.0° in the cesarean group at rest (P<0.001), and 182.5° in the instrumental group versus 156.5° in the cesarean group during contraction (P<0.001). The best predictive cutoff AoP for successful instrumental delivery was 138.7° at rest (sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 51.9%) and 160.9° during contraction (sensitivity 87.1%, specificity 74.1%). No between-group differences in AoP were found for ease of vacuum extraction at rest (P=0.457) or during contraction with pushing (P=0.095). CONCLUSION: The AoP predicted approximately 80% of successful instrumental deliveries performed for prolonged second stage of labor.