Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 75(4): 3903-3905, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37974881

ABSTRACT

A 28-year-old male patient came to the prosthodontics department seeking replacement for his congenital defect left ear. With the use of digital technology, a silicone implant supported bar retained auricular prosthesis that is an exact match in size, shape, and orientation to the existing contralateral ear was made.

2.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 21(4): 1175-1179, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36896084

ABSTRACT

Background: Considering the two-implant-retained overdenture as a first treatment of choice for edentulous mandible, patients using the overdentures need to be satisfied with the type of attachment used. The purpose of this study was to determine level of patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures opposing conventional maxillary complete denture using ball-socket and bar-clip attachments. Materials and Methods: In this within-subject crossover randomized clinical trial, total 20 edentulous patients were given conventional complete dentures for 3 months to use. All completed a satisfaction questionnaire before implant placement. They were randomly assigned to receive an overdenture retained by either ball or bar attachment. After 3 months satisfaction questionnaires were repeated, and crossover was done by changing the attachments. After use of 3 months of alternate attachments, patients were asked to complete the final questionnaires and asked to choose their preferred type. The patient satisfaction scores were recorded after using 3 months of conventional complete denture, 3 months of first attachment and 3 months of second attachment. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The P values were adjusted using Bonferroni multiple testing correction, and P < .05 were considered as statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between ball and bar attachments. However, patient satisfaction improved significantly between baseline and either-attachment-retained prosthesis. At the end of the comparative crossover experiment, 11 patients voted for the ball attachments and 9 for the bar attachments, thereby indicating them as their preferred attachments. Conclusions: Among ball and bar attachment, there was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction scores. Neither ball nor bar attachment was chosen as a preference over the other.

3.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc ; 19(3): 248-254, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31462864

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study evaluated and compared the diametral tensile strength (DTS) of phosphate-bonded investment (PBI) material (ringless) used in removable cast partial denture fabrication. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Comparative - Invitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PBI material, Wirovest used in this study was subjected to four different drying methods. A total of 80 specimens were prepared in a cylindrical form; 20 specimens were air dried for 2 h, 20 specimens were dried in a conventional oven at 230°C for 1 h, 20 specimens were dried in microwave oven at 600 W for 10 min, and remaining 20 specimens were dried first in microwave oven and then in conventional oven. The dried specimens were tested at 2-h interval for diametral compression at a crosshead speed of 0.5 cm/min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Pairwise analysis. RESULTS: The microwave drying technique and drying by combination method resulted in greater DTS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, PBI specimens dried in microwave oven at 600W for 10 min increased the diametral strength and are also a time-saving procedure.

4.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc ; 19(2): 173-179, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31040552

ABSTRACT

AIM: Displacement of gingiva is essential for obtaining accurate impressions for the fabrication of fixed prostheses, particularly when the finish line is at or within the gingival sulcus. Various newer impression materials have been introduced to achieve gingival displacement while recording the impressions. A comparative evaluation of these new gingival displacement materials was deemed necessary for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten individuals were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for gingival displacement using retraction cord impregnated with aluminum chloride and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials (Aquasil and NoCord VPS impression system) according to Latin block design. Intraoral scanner and Vernier caliper were used to study and compare the dimensional accuracy of each die obtained following which the dies were sectioned and evaluated under optical microscope with image analyzer to measure the amount of gingival retraction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Statistical analysis showed that the amount of gingival retraction obtained by using retraction cord impregnated with aluminum chloride as gingival retraction agent was maximum as compared to NoCord followed by Aquasil. All three gingival displacement techniques could produce gingival displacement >0.2 mm which is the optimum amount of retraction required for impression making. All the three materials are found to be dimensionally accurate.

5.
Contemp Clin Dent ; 9(Suppl 1): S137-S141, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29962779

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Impression making is one of the most important steps in prosthodontic rehabilitation of edentulous patients. Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) impression paste is the most commonly used material for complete denture wash impression due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of manipulation, while providing the advantage of ability to record fine minute tissue details. Rheological property like flow is a critical factor influencing the success of any impression material, especially in intraoral conditions. Therefore, with so many brands of commercially available impression materials flooding the markets, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flow property of four commercially available ZOE impression materials under simulated intraoral condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The testing method used was according to the American Dental Association (ADA) specification no. 16 for ZOE impression pastes. RESULTS: At room temperature, maximum flow was seen with Denzomix followed by Dental Product of India (DPI), Neogenate, and Cavex in descending order, respectively, at 30 s, 1 min, and 10 min of load application. At 37°C in saliva, maximum flow was seen with Denzomix followed by Neogenate, DPI, and Cavex in descending order, respectively, at 30 s, 1 min, and 10 min of load application. Of the four ZOE impression pastes, only the flow of Cavex was considerably less than ADA specified value. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Results obtained from this study showed that there is considerable variation in the flow values of different commercially available ZOE impression materials. Change in temperature and presence of saliva had a significant influence on the flow of ZOE impression materials.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...