Efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Select site - cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is typically attempted with biventricular (BiV) pacing. One-third of patients are nonresponders. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been evaluated as an alternative means. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and clinical response of permanent LBBAP as an alternative to BiV pacing. METHODS: Of 479 consecutive patients referred with heart failure, 50 with BiV-CRT and 51 with LBBAP-CRT were included in this analysis after study exclusions. Quality-of-Life (QoL) assessments, echocardiographic measurements, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were obtained at baseline and at 6-monthly intervals. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups (all P > .05). Clinical outcomes such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-systolic volume, QoL, and NYHA class were significantly improved for both pacing groups compared to baseline. The LBBAP-CRT group showed greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months (P = .001) and 12 months (P = .021), accompanied by greater reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (P = .007). QRS duration < 120 ms (baseline 160.82 ± 21.35 ms vs 161.08 ± 24.48 ms) was achieved in 30% in the BiV-CRT group vs 71% in the LBBAP-CRT group (P ≤ .001). Improvement in NYHA class (P = .031) and QoL index was greater (P = .014). Reduced heart failure admissions (P = .003) and health care utilization (P < .05) and improved lead performance (P < .001) were observed in the LBBAP-CRT group. CONCLUSION: LBBAP-CRT is feasible and effective CRT. It results into a meaningful improvement in QoL and reduction in health care utilization. This can be offered as an alternative to BiV-CRT or potentially as first-line therapy.

Posterior Wall Isolation Improves Outcomes for Persistent AF With Rapid Posterior Wall Activity: CAPLA Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less effective in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) than in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA randomized clinical trial) of PVI vs posterior wall isolation (PWI) did not support empiric PWI in PerAF. We examined pulmonary vein (PV) and posterior wall (PW) electrical characteristics to determine if select patients may benefit from additional PWI. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the impact of PV and PW electrical characteristics on AF ablation outcomes in the CAPLA randomized study. METHODS: Participants in spontaneous AF at the time of ablation were included from the CAPLA study. The mean, shortest, and longest PV, PW, and left atrial (LA) appendage cycle length measurements were annotated preablation using a multipolar catheter for 100 consecutive cycles. Next, cardioversion was performed with a high-density LA voltage map completed. Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to determine clinical and electroanatomic predictors of AF recurrence overall and according to ablation strategy. Follow-up included twice daily single-lead electrocardiograms or continuous monitoring for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients (27% female, age 65 ± 9 years, 18% long-standing PerAF, LA volume index 52 ± 16 mL/m2, median AF duration 5 months [IQR: 2-10 months]) were in AF on the day of procedure and were randomized to PVI alone (50%) or PVI+PWI (50%) according to the CAPLA randomized clinical trial protocol. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and electroanatomic parameters were comparable between groups (all P > 0.05) including PV and PW characteristics. After 12 months, freedom from AF off antiarrhythmic drug therapy was 51.7% in PVI and 49.7% in PVI+PWI (log-rank P = 0.564). Rapid PW activity was defined as less than the median of the shortest PW cycle length (140 ms) and rapid PV activity was defined as less than the median of the shortest PV cycle length (126 ms). In those with rapid PW activity, the addition of PWI was associated with greater arrhythmia-free survival (56.4%) vs PVI alone (38.6%) (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94; log-rank P = 0.030). Moreover, in those undergoing PVI only, the risk of AF recurrence was higher in those with rapid PW activity (55.3% vs 46.5% in slower PW activity; HR: 1.50, 95%CI 1.11-2.26; log-rank P = 0.036). Rapid PV activity and PV cycle length (individual PVs or average of all 4 PVs) were not associated with outcome (all P > 0.05) regardless of ablation strategy. There was no correlation between PW cycle length and posterior low voltage (r = -0.06, P = 0.496). The addition of PWI did not improve arrhythmia-free survival in subgroups with LA enlargement (LA volume index >34 mL/m2) (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.39-1.25; P = 0.301), posterior low-voltage zone (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.68-1.66; P = 0.807), or long-standing PerAF (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.71-1.72; P = 0.669). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid PW activity is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence post-catheter ablation. The addition of PWI in this subgroup was associated with a significant improvement in freedom from AF compared with PVI alone. The presence of rapid PW activity may identify patients with PerAF likely to benefit from PWI.