Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Retransplantation: United Network for Organ Sharing Data With Linked Primary and Retransplant.

INTRODUCTION: There are several articles exploring the risk factors for primary delayed graft function (DGF). However, current literature does not include many resources on the risk factors for DGF when it is a recipient's second kidney transplant or look at short-term graft and patient survival of DGF retransplants. METHODS: United Network for Organ Sharing data from January 2008 to June 2021 were analyzed. Pancreas transplants, multi-organ transplants, and lost to follow-up transplants were excluded. Second transplant patients with DGF were identified. Multivariate logistic regression models based on the primary and second transplant characteristics were created. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier methodology and assessed with log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 2964 second kidney transplants were identified. Rate of DGF in the second transplant was 28.4% (843/2964) and 49.2% of them had a prior DGF in their first transplant (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that occurrence of DGF (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, P < 0.001) and graft loss due to acute rejection (OR 1.2, P < 0.005) in the primary transplant were predictors of reappearing DGF in the second transplant. Dialysis at transplant was the greatest risk factor from the second transplant (OR 3.539, P < 0.001). There was a decreased graft survival after 12 mo (77% versus 49% with log t-test <0.001) in the second transplant. However, DGF was not significantly associated with patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the interaction between primary and second transplant in developing DGF. Survival analysis shows lower graft survival for retransplants in the case of DGF. This study opens the possibility of identifying additional risk factors for patients undergoing retransplant surgeries.

Pericardial Effusion After Renal Transplantation: Timing and Clinical Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusion and tamponade have been recognized as potentially serious complications in patients who have undergone renal transplantation. Our study aims to analyze the association between sirolimus and the development of pericardial effusion in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of 585 consecutive patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2005 and 2016. The study included 82 patients (14%) who developed new pericardial effusion after transplantation. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, medication use, echocardiographic parameters, and time to occurrence of effusion were assessed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on timing of effusion development: early onset, ≤4 years after transplantation (51%); and late onset, >4 years after transplantation (49%). We examined the likelihood of immunosuppressant use and timing of effusion development using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 55.1 ± 11.5 years, 58.5% were men, 81.7% were white, and mean time from transplantation to the development of effusion was 4 ± 3.1 years. There were no significant differences between the early and late effusion groups in the demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities. However, sirolimus therapy was more common in the late effusion group. Furthermore, after adjusting for comorbidities, sirolimus use was associated with greater risk for developing late-onset effusion, adjusted odds ratio of 3.58 (95% confidence interval 1.25-10.20, P = .017). CONCLUSION: Pericardial effusion is prevalent in renal transplant recipients. In our cohort, treatment with sirolimus was associated with late-onset pericardial effusion. Awareness of pericardial disease in this population is important, and further studies are needed to identify predisposing factors.

Pericardial Effusion Associated With Sirolimus Use After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Case Series.

Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade following renal transplantation have been recognized as a potentially serious complications associated with the use of sirolimus for immunosuppression. Our study aims to analyze the development of sirolimus-associated pericardial effusion. Patients who underwent renal transplantation at our institution between 2001 and 2014 were reviewed and the correlation between sirolimus exposure and pericardial effusion was determined. Nineteen out of 792 patients who received a renal transplant over this 14-year period (incidence 2.4%) developed symptomatic pericardial effusion (determined by the need for pericardiocentesis or a pericardial window). All patients had a pre-transplantation cardiac workup, including echocardiogram, which did not reveal the presence of pericardial effusion. Our cohort of patients is mostly male (57.9%) and Caucasian (73.7%), which is consistent with the makeup of transplant recipients at our center. The mean age was 52.42 years at the time of transplantation. The development of symptomatic pericardial effusions occurred at a mean of 5.06 (.5-9.8) years after renal transplant while on sirolimus therapy. Sirolimus levels at diagnosis were 5.19-7.47 ng/mL. No significant pericardial effusion (resulting in tamponade physiology) recurred after therapeutic intervention, including cessation of sirolimus with or without pericardial drainage. This study is the largest single-center report of the possible association between pericardial effusion in renal transplant recipients who received sirolimus. Due to the widespread use of sirolimus in organ transplantation, clinicians must remain vigilant for this potential cardiac complication.

Influence of mildly and moderately elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure on post-renal transplantation survival and graft function.

BACKGROUND: Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been associated with decreased post-kidney transplant survival and increased rate of long-term cardiovascular complications. Despite a high prevalence of PH in patients with end-stage renal disease, data on post-transplant renal allograft survival in recipients with pre-existing mild-to-moderate PH are limited. METHODS: The single-center retrospective study cohort consisted of 192 consecutive (2008-2015) renal transplant recipients with documented pretransplantation transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Mean age was 50.9 ± 12.4 years, 36.5% were females, and 81.25% were Caucasians. RESULTS: Elevated PASP ≥ 37 mm Hg was present in 51 patients. Elevated PASP was more common in patients with decreased <50% left ventricular ejection fraction (13.73% vs 3.55%, P = 0.010); otherwise, there were no significant differences in baseline demographic (age, ethnicity, gender, and donor status) and clinical parameters between patients with normal and elevated PASP. Four-year mortality (5.7%) was not significantly affected by elevated PASP. However, elevated PASP was associated with significantly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year (52.26 vs 60.13 mL/min, P = 0.019) and 2 years (51.04 vs 60.28 mL/min, P = 0.006) post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Mild and moderately elevated pre-kidney transplant PASP does not affect 4-year post-transplant mortality or graft loss. However, elevated pretransplant PASP is significantly associated with decreased 1 year and 2 years post-transplant eGFR. Preoperative echocardiographic evaluation for PH may be useful in predicting the probability of short-term renal graft and long-term graft dysfunction in these patients.

The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates - A single center analysis.

The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90-98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90-98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates.

Early steroid withdrawal results in improved patient and graft survival and lower risk of post-transplant cardiovascular risk profiles: A single-center 10-year experience.

Long-term use of steroids results in predictable secondary effects that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, we present 10 years worth of data of early steroid withdrawal (ESW) immunosuppression consisting of mycophenolate, sirolimus, and tacrolimus. From 2003 to 2013, 563 kidney transplant recipients were weaned off steroids prior to discharge. We compared outcomes with that of our 65 historical controls maintained on steroids. We analyzed graft and patient survival and determined the incidence of steroid-related comorbidities such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and weight gain. Patients on ESW maintenance immunosuppression had improved patient and graft survival compared to controls. (HR: 0.23; P≤.011, 0.57; P=.026). Rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection were not different among both groups (HR: 1.24; P=.610). Incidence of post-transplant diabetes were reduced but not statistically significant (OR: 0.67; P=.138). Additionally, the development of hypertension (OR: 0.86, P≤.01), hypercholesterolemia (RR: 0.82; P=.027), CAD (RR: 0.43; P=.002), and >20 lbs. weight gain (RR: 0.29; P≤.01) was significantly improved over 10 years following initiation of ESW protocols. Early steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients results in improved patient and graft survival as well as better rates of post-transplant comorbid conditions.

Outcomes of pancreas retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas retransplantation is associated with increased rates of technical failure and rejection compared to other organ transplants. As such, it is not routinely done, and outcomes are mostly known through registry data. Here we analyze the outcomes of primary versus retransplant for all pancreas transplants done in our program over nearly 35 years. METHODS: Donor and recipient characteristics and outcomes data were prospectively gathered and recorded in our institutional database. Outcomes of primary and retransplants were reported overall, and then subgrouped by number (second, third, fourth). An in-depth analysis of transplants done after 2003 was included. Rates of technical failure, 1 year acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival were compared. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred forty-five pancreas transplants were performed at our institution between 1978 and 2012. Four hundred fifteen of these were retransplants. Improvements were seen in technical failure rates and graft survival for both primary and retransplants over time. There were no significant differences in technical failure or patient survival for primary versus retransplants overall, or by transplant number (second, third, fourth). Modern era retransplants had more acute rejection in the first year after transplantation. Retransplants (vs primary) had decreased mid-term death censored graft survival. Transplant type continues to be an important driver of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Retransplant outcomes have improved over time, yet increased rejection and immunologic graft loss rates remain associated with pancreas retransplantation. In contrast, risk of technical failure and patient death for primary versus retransplants are similar. Therefore, pancreas retransplantation in highly selected candidates should be considered in experienced centers.

Role of magnetic resonance enterography in the management of Crohn disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) on therapeutic decision making for patients with Crohn disease. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENT: One hundred twenty patients who had either a history of or high suspicion for Crohn disease with onset of new symptoms underwent MRE over 18 months at our institution. All patients with Crohn disease were classified according to the Montreal system. INTERVENTIONS: Magnetic resonance enterography and medical vs surgical therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes in management after MRE findings. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance enterography demonstrated active Crohn disease in 57.5% of patients, chronic changes of Crohn disease without active inflammation (eg, stricture, fistula, or abscess) in 12.5% of cases, and no evidence of Crohn disease in 30% of cases. After MRE, 37 (31%) had no change in medical therapy, 64 (53%) had additional medical management for active inflammation, and 19 (16%) underwent an operation for complicated Crohn disease or medical intractability. In all surgical patients, the intraoperative findings were consistent with the MRE diagnosis. The mean (SD) MRE score was 1.6 (0.5) for patients who had no change in their treatment plans, 5.8 (1) for patients who underwent surgery, and 8 (0.4) for patients who had their drug regimen changed (P < .001). The MRE score independently correlated with need for intervention (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance enterography shows promising ability to characterize the presence of active Crohn disease as well as chronic complications (eg, differentiate between stricture due to edema vs fibrotic scarring). Magnetic resonance enterography is fast becoming a useful adjunct in the management algorithm of patients with Crohn disease.