Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(5): 585-590, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448339

ABSTRACT

Late-repair craniosynostosis (LRC), defined as craniosynostosis surgery beyond 1 year of age, is often associated with increased complexity and potential complications. Our study analyzed data from the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database to investigate patient factors related to LRC. Of 10 830 craniosynostosis repair cases, 17% were LRC. These patients were predominantly from lower-income families and had more comorbidities, indicating that socioeconomic status could be a significant contributor. LRC patients were typically treated at teaching hospitals and privately owned investment institutions. Our risk-adjusted analysis revealed that LRC patients were more likely to belong to the lowest-income quartile, receive treatment at privately owned investment hospitals, and use self-payment methods. Despite these challenges, the hospital stay duration did not significantly differ between the two groups. Interestingly, LRC patients faced a higher predicted mean total cost compared with those who had surgery before turning 1. This difference in cost did not translate to a longer length of stay, further emphasizing the complexity of managing LRC. These findings highlight the urgent need for earlier intervention in craniosynostosis cases, particularly in lower-income communities. The medical community must strive to improve early diagnosis and treatment strategies in order to mitigate the socioeconomic and health disparities observed in LRC patients.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , Databases, Factual , Patient Readmission , Humans , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , United States , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Length of Stay
2.
Cureus ; 15(10): e46433, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927762

ABSTRACT

Introduction Traditional medical education has leaned heavily on memorization, pattern recognition, and learned algorithmic thinking. Increasingly, however, creativity and innovation are becoming recognized as a valuable component of medical education. In this national survey of Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) member institutions, we seek to examine the current landscape of exposure to innovation-related training within the formal academic setting. Methods Surveys were distributed to 168 of 171 AAMC-member institutions (the remaining three were excluded from the study for lack of publicly available contact information). Questions assessed exposure for medical students among four defined innovation pillars as follows: (1) medical humanities, (2) design thinking, (3) entrepreneurship, or (4) technology transfer. Chi-squared analysis was used to assess statistical significance between schools, comparing schools ranked in the top 20 by the US News and World Report against non-top 20 respondents, and comparing schools that serve as National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program hubs against non-CTSA schools. Heat maps for geospatial visualization of data were created using ArcGIS (ArcMAP 10.6) software (Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute). Results The overall response rate was 94.2% with 161 schools responding. Among respondents, 101 (63%) reported having medical humanities curricula at their institution. Design thinking offerings were noted at 51/161 (32%) institutions. Support for entrepreneurship was observed at 51/161 institutions (32%), and technology transfer infrastructure was confirmed at 42/161 (26%) of institutions. No statistically significant difference was found between top 20 schools and lower 141 schools when comparing schools with no innovation programs or one or more innovation programs (p=0.592), or all four innovation programs (p=0.108). CTSA programs, however, did show a statistically significant difference (p<0.00001) when comparing schools with no innovation programs vs. one or more programs, but not when comparing to schools with all four innovation programs (p=0.639). Conclusion This study demonstrated an overwhelming prevalence of innovation programs in today's AAMC medical schools, with over 75% of surveyed institutions offering at least one innovation program. No statistically significant trend was seen in the presence of zero programs, one or more, or all four programs between top 20 programs and the remaining 141. CTSA hub schools, however, were significantly more likely to have at least one program vs. none compared to non-CTSA hub schools. Future studies would be valuable to assess the long-term impact of this trend on medical student education.

3.
J Burn Care Res ; 44(4): 945-948, 2023 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260537

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many Americans to adapt their daily routines. In 2020, there was a significant increase in house fires according to the National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA). The objective of this study was to characterize the changes in suspected smoke inhalations (SSIs) during the first year of the pandemic in the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS). The NEMSIS database was queried for all EMS transports captured between 2017 and 2020. Differences in the incidences of SSIs and fire dispatches in 2020 were estimated using Poisson regression models. There was a 13.4% increase in the incidence of fire dispatches and a 15% increase in SSIs transported in 2020 compared to the previous 3 years. The incidence rate ratio of both fire dispatches (1.271; 95% CI: 1.254-1.288; P < .001) and SSI (1.152; 95% CI: 1.070-1.241; P < .001) was significantly elevated in 2020. The increases in fire dispatches and SSIs observed in the NEMSIS database are in concordance with other literature indicating the increase in fire incidence and morbidity observed during the pandemic. These results should inform fire prevention outreach efforts and resource allocation in burn centers in the event of future pandemic.


Subject(s)
Burns , COVID-19 , Fires , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Smoke
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...