Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 33(4): 2021-2023, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33792467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: See-and-treat ('one stop') clinics for cutaneous and noncutaneous tumor streams have been shown to enhance patient experience, amongst other benefits, such as reduced waiting time to surgery if required. To date, there have been no studies assessing patient perception of one-stop clinics dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of melanomas and pigmented lesions. OBJECTIVE: To perform a prospective survey study examining patient's perception of a see-and-treat pigmented lesion clinic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consenting patients were contacted by phone to complete a survey comprising 10 statements relating to different facets of the clinic, four weeks after their initial assessment. Reponses were documented on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 107/142 (75.4%) patients consented to partake in the study. Compared to overall mean response, patients who underwent same-day biopsy reported higher satisfaction (4.9 vs. 4.5, p < .01) and perceived convenience (4.8 vs. 4.4, p < .01). Of those who received same-day procedures, no patient reported being given insufficient time to consider surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: A see-and-treat model for pigmented lesions, incorporating same-day excisional biopsy for lesions suspicious for melanoma, is viewed upon favorably by patients.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/surgery , Patient Outcome Assessment , Prospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/surgery
2.
N Z Med J ; 134(1530): 30-37, 2021 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651775

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the outcomes and effect of a multidisciplinary 'see and treat' pigmented lesion clinic, run jointly by dermatology and general surgery, on the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma at Auckland District Health Board (DHB). METHOD: All patients attending the newly established Pigmented Lesion Clinic (PLC) between 1 March 2019 and 31 August 2019 were included in the study. They were compared against a retrospective cohort of patients seen for suspected or biopsy-proven melanomas during the same corresponding period in 2016. RESULTS: 251 new patients attended the PLC, compared to 148 new patients seen at Auckland DHB in 2016. There was a significant reduction in proportion of pigmented lesions requiring biopsy (35.2% vs 64.3%, p<0.001), with a benign-to-malignant ratio of 2.4:1. Fifty-three melanomas were treated through the PLC, with a significant reduction in mean waiting time from referral to first specialist assessment (22.6 vs 35.1 days, p=0.038), and from referral to wide local excision (50.6 vs 99.1 days, p<0.001). 86.5% of patients received full skin check, from which additional skin malignancies were detected in 1-per-5.3 patients. CONCLUSION: The novel PLC model has led to reduction in unnecessary excisional biopsies of benign pigmented lesions, while streamlining and improving timely access to specialist review and surgical treatment for patients with melanomas.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/pathology , Nevus, Pigmented/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Dermatology/methods , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Neoplasm Invasiveness , New Zealand , Predictive Value of Tests , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL