Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Chest ; 2023 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065405

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for early-stage or locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes surgical resection. Recurrence after surgery is commonly reported, but a summary estimate for postsurgical recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with NSCLC is lacking. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the RFS after surgery in patients with stage I-III NSCLC at different time points, and what factors are associated with RFS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 2011 and June 2021. The primary outcome was RFS at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postresection. Single-arm, random-effects meta-analyses were done to calculate effect estimates and 95% CIs. Analyses were stratified by stage/substage as per the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, and RFS was estimated (1) after pooling studies, using seventh or eighth edition staging criteria; and (2) among studies using only the eighth edition. Meta-regressions were performed to assess associations between RFS and patient demographic/clinical characteristics of interest. RESULTS: Data from 471 studies comprising 1,060 surgical study arms were extracted. RFS estimates from 60,695 patients staged with the seventh or eighth edition were analyzed. RFS ranged from 96% at 1 year postresection to 82% at 5 years for stage I, and from 68% at 1 year to 34% at 5 years for stage III. Estimates for patients staged using only eighth edition criteria were slightly higher. Older age, higher percentage of male patients, advancing stage, larger tumor size, and geographic region (North America/Europe vs Asia) were significantly associated with worse RFS. INTERPRETATION: This study presents a comprehensive assessment of reported RFS from published clinical literature, offering estimates at multiple postsurgical time points and by geographic region. Findings can inform treatment decisions, clinical trial design, and future research to improve outcomes among patients with NSCLC.

2.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 32(3): 337-343, 2023 03 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36576991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study used machine learning to develop a 3-year lung cancer risk prediction model with large real-world data in a mostly younger population. METHODS: Over 4.7 million individuals, aged 45 to 65 years with no history of any cancer or lung cancer screening, diagnostic, or treatment procedures, with an outpatient visit in 2013 were identified in Optum's de-identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) dataset. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model was fit using all available data in the 365 days prior. Temporal validation was assessed with recent data. External validation was assessed with data from Mercy Health Systems EHR and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Racial inequities in model discrimination were assessed with xAUCs. RESULTS: The model AUC was 0.76. Top predictors included age, smoking, race, ethnicity, and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The model identified a high-risk group with lung cancer incidence 9 times the average cohort incidence, representing 10% of patients with lung cancer. Model performed well temporally and externally, while performance was reduced for Asians and Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: A high-dimensional model trained using big data identified a subset of patients with high lung cancer risk. The model demonstrated transportability to EHR and claims data, while underscoring the need to assess racial disparities when using machine learning methods. IMPACT: This internally and externally validated real-world data-based lung cancer prediction model is available on an open-source platform for broad sharing and application. Model integration into an EHR system could minimize physician burden by automating identification of high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Early Detection of Cancer , Incidence , Machine Learning , Electronic Health Records
3.
JMIR AI ; 2: e44537, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) appearing in computed tomography (CT) scans may indicate potential lung malignancy. Proper management of GGOs based on their features can prevent the development of lung cancer. Electronic health records are rich sources of information on GGO nodules and their granular features, but most of the valuable information is embedded in unstructured clinical notes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop, test, and validate a deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) tool that automatically extracts GGO features to inform the longitudinal trajectory of GGO status from large-scale radiology notes. METHODS: We developed a bidirectional long short-term memory with a conditional random field-based deep-learning NLP pipeline to extract GGO and granular features of GGO retrospectively from radiology notes of 13,216 lung cancer patients. We evaluated the pipeline with quality assessments and analyzed cohort characterization of the distribution of nodule features longitudinally to assess changes in size and solidity over time. RESULTS: Our NLP pipeline built on the GGO ontology we developed achieved between 95% and 100% precision, 89% and 100% recall, and 92% and 100% F1-scores on different GGO features. We deployed this GGO NLP model to extract and structure comprehensive characteristics of GGOs from 29,496 radiology notes of 4521 lung cancer patients. Longitudinal analysis revealed that size increased in 16.8% (240/1424) of patients, decreased in 14.6% (208/1424), and remained unchanged in 68.5% (976/1424) in their last note compared to the first note. Among 1127 patients who had longitudinal radiology notes of GGO status, 815 (72.3%) were reported to have stable status, and 259 (23%) had increased/progressed status in the subsequent notes. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning-based NLP pipeline can automatically extract granular GGO features at scale from electronic health records when this information is documented in radiology notes and help inform the natural history of GGO. This will open the way for a new paradigm in lung cancer prevention and early detection.

4.
Drug Saf ; 43(2): 147-161, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677004

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women of childbearing potential are often treated with monoclonal antibodies to control chronic and debilitating inflammatory diseases. Remicade® (innovator infliximab [IFX]) may cross the placenta after the first trimester of pregnancy. Hence, evidence is needed to optimize treatment while carefully weighing benefits and risks to the mother and child. Here, we report on birth and infant outcomes (up to 2 years) following gestational exposure to IFX based on a summary of cumulative pregnancy reports in women exposed to IFX during pregnancy from the Janssen global safety database. METHODS: Prospective and medically confirmed safety data on IFX-exposed pregnancies from Janssen's global safety surveillance database since authorization in 1998 are summarized. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize pregnancy and infant outcomes overall, by disease and timing of exposure. RESULTS: As of 23 August 2018, 1850 maternally IFX-exposed pregnancies with known outcomes were identified from the safety database. Of the 1850 pregnancies (mean age 29.7 years), 1526 (82.5%) resulted in live births. When reported, most women had Crohn's disease (67.7%) or ulcerative colitis (18.4%), and 82.8% of live births were exposed to IFX in the first trimester. Spontaneous abortion/intrauterine death/ectopic pregnancy/molar pregnancy (12.1%), preterm births (9.2%), low birth weight infants (3.6%), congenital anomalies (2.0%), and infant infections (1.2%) were documented. The type of congenital anomalies and frequency of serious infant infections observed were consistent with the general population. Frequencies of congenital anomalies and other adverse outcomes were similar in women exposed to IFX in the first trimester and those exposed in the third trimester. More preterm births (13-18.8%) and infant complications (8.7-12.5%) were reported with concomitant immunosuppressant use. CONCLUSIONS: The observed prevalence of adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes including congenital anomalies following exposure to IFX did not exceed estimates reported for the general population and no unexpected patterns were observed.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Infliximab/administration & dosage , Infliximab/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Adult , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/chemically induced , Prevalence , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
5.
PLoS One ; 14(12): e0226255, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Confounding by disease severity is an issue in pharmacoepidemiology studies of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), due to channeling of sicker patients to certain therapies. To address the issue of limited clinical data for confounder adjustment, a patient-level prediction model to differentiate between patients prescribed and not prescribed advanced therapies was developed as a surrogate for disease severity, using all available data from a US claims database. METHODS: Data from adult RA patients were used to build regularized logistic regression models to predict current and future disease severity using a biologic or tofacitinib prescription claim as a surrogate for moderate-to-severe disease. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver (AUC) operating characteristic curve, tested and trained in Optum Clinformatics® Extended DataMart (Optum) and additionally validated in three external IBM MarketScan® databases. The model was further validated in the Optum database across a range of patient cohorts. RESULTS: In the Optum database (n = 68,608), the AUC for discriminating RA patients with a prescription claim for a biologic or tofacitinib versus those without in the 90 days following index diagnosis was 0.80. Model AUCs were 0.77 in IBM CCAE (n = 75,579) and IBM MDCD (n = 7,537) and 0.75 in IBM MDCR (n = 36,090). There was little change in the prediction model assessing discrimination 730 days following index diagnosis (prediction model AUC in Optum was 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: A prediction model demonstrated good discrimination across multiple claims databases to identify RA patients with a prescription claim for advanced therapies during different time-at-risk periods as proxy for current and future moderate-to-severe disease. This work provides a robust model-derived risk score that can be used as a potential covariate and proxy measure to adjust for confounding by severity in multivariable models in the RA population. An R package to develop the prediction model and risk score are available in an open source platform for researchers.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Databases, Factual , Insurance Claim Review , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 150(3): 655-66, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25809092

ABSTRACT

African American (AA) women are more likely than white women to be obese and to be diagnosed with ER- and triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, but few studies have evaluated the impact of obesity and body fat distribution on breast cancer subtypes in AA women. We evaluated these associations in the AMBER Consortium by pooling data from four large studies. Cases were categorized according to hormone receptor status as ER+, ER-, and TN (ER-, PR-, and HER2-) based on pathology data. A total of 2104 ER+ cases, 1070 ER- cases (including 491 TN cases), and 12,060 controls were included. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were computed using logistic regression, taking into account breast cancer risk factors. In postmenopausal women, higher recent (most proximal value to diagnosis/index date) BMI was associated with increased risk of ER+ cancer (OR 1.31; 95 % CI 1.02-1.67 for BMI ≥ 35 vs. <25 kg/m(2)) and with decreased risk of TN tumors (OR 0.60; 95 % CI 0.39-0.93 for BMI ≥ 35 vs. <25). High young adult BMI was associated with decreased premenopausal ER+ cancer and all subtypes of postmenopausal cancer, and high recent waist-to-hip ratio with increased risk of premenopausal ER+ tumors (OR 1.35; 95 % CI 1.01-1.80) and all tumor subtypes combined in postmenopausal women (OR 1.26; 95 % CI 1.02-1.56). The impact of general and central obesity varies by menopausal status and hormone receptor subtype in AA women. Our findings imply different mechanisms for associations of adiposity with TN and ER+ breast cancers.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Body Fat Distribution/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Obesity/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/ethnology , Odds Ratio , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Risk Factors
7.
Nutr Cancer ; 66(7): 1187-99, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25265504

ABSTRACT

Limiting energy-dense foods, fast foods, and sugary drinks that promote weight gain is a cancer prevention recommendation, but no studies have evaluated intake in relation to breast cancer risk in African American (AA) women. In a case-control study with 1692 AA women (803 cases and 889 controls) and 1456 European American (EA) women (755 cases and 701 controls), odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk were computed, stratifying for menopausal and estrogen receptor (ER) status. Among postmenopausal EA women, breast cancer risk was associated with frequent consumption of energy-dense foods (OR = 2.95; 95% CI: 1.66-5.22), fast foods (OR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.38-4.00), and sugary drinks (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.13-3.70). Elevated risk of ER+ tumors in EA women was associated with energy-dense (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.14-2.69) and fast foods (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.22-2.77). Among AA women, frequent fast food consumption was related to premenopausal breast cancer risk (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.13-3.43), and with ER+ tumors. Energy adjustment attenuated risk estimates in AA women, while strengthening them among EA women. Frequent consumption of energy-dense and fast foods that have poor nutritive value appeared to increase breast cancer risk in AA and EA women, with differences by menopausal status and ER status.


Subject(s)
Beverages/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Dietary Carbohydrates/adverse effects , Energy Intake , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Diet , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Nutritive Sweeteners/adverse effects , Postmenopause , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Weight Gain , White People , Young Adult
8.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 106(2): djt431, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24503200

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regular aspirin use is associated with reduced risk of several malignancies. Epidemiologic studies analyzing aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen use and ovarian cancer risk have been inconclusive. METHODS: We analyzed pooled data from 12 population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer, including 7776 case patients and 11843 control subjects accrued between 1992 and 2007. Odds ratios (ORs) for associations of medication use with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer were estimated in individual studies using logistic regression and combined using random effects meta-analysis. Associations between frequency, dose, and duration of analgesic use and risk of ovarian cancer were also assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84 to 0.99). Results were similar but not statistically significant for nonaspirin NSAIDs, and there was no association with acetaminophen. In seven studies with frequency data, the reduced risk was strongest among daily aspirin users (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.96). In three studies with dose information, the reduced risk was strongest among users of low dose (<100 mg) aspirin (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.83), whereas for nonaspirin NSAIDs, the reduced risk was strongest for high dose (≥500 mg) usage (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer, especially among daily users of low-dose aspirin. These findings suggest that the same aspirin regimen proven to protect against cardiovascular events and several cancers could reduce the risk of ovarian cancer 20% to 34% depending on frequency and dose of use.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anticarcinogenic Agents/administration & dosage , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/prevention & control , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Protective Agents/administration & dosage , Australia/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Case-Control Studies , Data Collection , Denmark/epidemiology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
9.
Int J Cancer ; 134(6): 1422-35, 2014 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23996837

ABSTRACT

African American (AA) women are more likely than European American (EA) women to be diagnosed with breast cancer at younger ages and to develop poor prognosis tumors. However, these racial differences are largely unexplained. Folate and other methyl-group nutrients may be related to breast carcinogenesis, but few studies have examined these associations in AA populations. We examined the associations of dietary intake of these nutrients with breast cancer risk overall, by menopausal and estrogen receptor (ER) status among 1,582 AA (749 cases) and 1,434 EA (744 cases) women using data from a case-control study, the Women's Circle of Health Study. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of each nutrient and breast cancer risk. In AA women, inverse associations were observed for natural food folate intake among premenopausal women (fourth vs. first quartile: OR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.33-1.00; p for trend = 0.06) and for ER-positive tumors (fourth vs. first quartile: OR = 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.93; p for trend = 0.03), whereas in EA women, a positive association was observed for intake of synthetic folate (fourth vs. first quartile: OR = 1.53, 95% CI, 1.06-2.21; p for trend = 0.03). Our findings suggest that natural food folate intake is inversely associated with breast cancer risk and that this association may vary by race, menopausal status or ER status. The finding of an increased risk observed among EA women with the highest intake of synthetic folate from fortified foods warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Diet , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Methionine/administration & dosage , Vitamin B 12/administration & dosage , Vitamin B 6/administration & dosage , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Premenopause , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Risk Factors , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Young Adult
10.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 475, 2013 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24118876

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been shown to be inversely associated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, while increasing risk in postmenopausal women. However, the current evidence is largely based on studies in Caucasian populations. Associations in women of African ancestry (AA), who have a higher prevalence of obesity, have been evaluated in few studies and results suggest different effects. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of body size, body fat distribution, and body composition on breast cancer risk among AA women (978 cases and 958 controls) participating in the Women's Circle of Health Study, a multi-site case-control study in New York City (NYC) and New Jersey (NJ). Cases were newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, age 20-75 yrs. In NYC, cases were recruited through hospitals with the largest referral patterns for AA women and controls through random digit dialing (RDD). In NJ, cases were identified in seven counties in NJ thorough the NJ State Cancer Registry, and controls through RDD and community-based recruitment. During in-person interviews, questionnaires were administered and detailed anthropometric measurements were obtained. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. RESULTS: BMI did not have a major impact on pre- or post-menopausal breast cancer, but was significantly associated with reduced risk of ER-/PR- tumors among postmenopausal women (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.96 for BMI > 30 vs. BMI < 25). Furthermore, increased premenopausal breast cancer risk was found for higher waist and hip circumferences after adjusting for BMI, with ORs of 2.25 (95% CI: 1.07-4.74) and 2.91 (95% CI: 1.39-6.10), respectively, comparing the highest vs. lowest quartile. While ORs for higher fat mass and percent body fat among postmenopausal women were above one, confidence intervals included the null value. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in AA women BMI is generally unrelated to breast cancer. However, higher waist and hip circumferences were associated with increased pre-menopausal breast cancer risk, while general obesity was associated with decreased risk of ER-/PR- tumors. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings and to evaluate the impact of obesity on breast cancer subtypes.


Subject(s)
Black People , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Obesity/complications , Risk , Adiposity , Adult , Body Composition , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged , New Jersey/epidemiology , New York City/epidemiology , Registries , Risk Factors
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(12): 2231-43, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113797

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is growing evidence that body size in early life influences lifetime breast cancer risk, but little is known for African American (AA) women. METHODS: We evaluated body size during childhood and young adulthood and breast cancer risk among 1,751 cases [979 AA and 772 European American (EA)] and 1,673 controls (958 AA and 715 EA) in the Women's Circle of Health Study. Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were computed using logistic regression models while adjusting for potential covariates. RESULTS: Among AA women, being shorter at 7-8 years compared to peers was associated with increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk (OR 1.68, 95 % CI 1.02-2.74), and being heavier at menarche with decreased postmenopausal breast cancer risk, although of borderline significance (OR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.20-1.02). For EA women, being shorter from childhood through adolescence, particularly at menarche, was associated with reduced premenopausal breast cancer risk (OR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.31-0.98). After excluding hormone replacement therapy users, an inverse association with postmenopausal breast cancer was found among EA women reporting to be heavier than their peers at menarche (OR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.04-0.79). The inverse relationship between BMI at age 20 and breast cancer risk was stronger and only statistically significant in EA women. No clear association with weight gain since age 20 was found. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the impact of childhood height on breast cancer risk may differ for EA and AA women and confirm the inverse association previously reported in EA populations with adolescent body fatness, in AA women.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Body Size , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , New Jersey/epidemiology , Postmenopause , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Young Adult
12.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(12): 2217-29, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24091794

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Research on the role of red meat and poultry consumption in breast carcinogenesis is inconclusive, but the evidence in African-American (AA) women is lacking. The association between consuming meat and breast cancer risk was examined in the Women's Circle of Health Study involving 803 AA cases, 889 AA controls, 755 Caucasian cases, and 701 Caucasian controls. METHODS: Dietary information was collected using a Food Frequency Questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from logistic regression models adjusting for potential covariates. RESULTS: Comparing the fourth versus the first quartiles, among Caucasian women, processed meat (OR = 1.48; 95 % CI 1.07-2.04), unprocessed red meat (OR = 1.40; 95 % CI 1.01-1.94), and poultry intakes (OR = 1.42; 95 % CI 1.01-1.99) increased breast cancer risk. Risk associated with poultry intake was more dominant in premenopausal women (OR = 2.33; 95 % CI 1.44-3.77) and for women with ER- tumors (OR = 2.55; 95 % CI 1.29-5.03) in the Caucasian group. Associations in AA women were mostly null except for a significant increased risk trend with processed meat consumption for ER+ tumors (OR = 1.36; 95 % CI 0.94-1.97, p trend = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, associations between breast cancer risk and consumption of red meat and poultry were of different magnitude in AA and Caucasian women, with further differences noted by menopausal and hormone receptor status in Caucasian women. This is the first study to examine racial differences in meat and breast cancer risk and represents some of the first evidence in AA women.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Diet , Health Status Disparities , Meat/adverse effects , Poultry , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
13.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 13: 71, 2013 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23721229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of controls remains a challenge in case-control studies and particularly in studies involving minority populations. METHODS: We compared characteristics of controls recruited through random digit dialing (RDD) to those of community controls enrolled through churches, health events and other outreach sources among women of African ancestry (AA) participating in the Women's Circle of Health Study, a case-control study of breast cancer. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were also computed using unconditional logistic regression to evaluate the impact of including the community controls for selected variables relevant to breast cancer and for which there were significant differences in distribution between the two control groups. RESULTS: Compared to community controls (n=347), RDD controls (n=207) had more years of education and higher income, lower body mass index, were more likely to have private insurance, and less likely to be single. While the percentage of nulliparous women in the two groups was similar, community controls tended to have more children, have their first child at a younger age, and were less likely to breastfeed their children. Dietary intake was similar in the two groups. Compared to census data, the combination of RDD and community controls seems to be more representative of the general population than RDD controls alone. Furthermore, the inclusion of the community group had little impact on the magnitude of risk estimates for most variables, while enhancing statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based recruitment was found to be an efficient and feasible method to recruit AA controls.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Control Groups , Minority Groups , Adult , Aged , Black People , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Research Design , Risk Factors , White People , Young Adult
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(7): 1427-36, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23657460

ABSTRACT

Consumption of foods high in sugar promotes insulin production, which has been linked to endometrial carcinogenesis. We evaluated the impact of dietary intake of sugary foods and beverages, as well as added sugar and total sugar on endometrial cancer risk in a population-based case-control study, including 424 cases and 398 controls. Participants completed an interview and food frequency questionnaire, and provided self-recorded waist and hip measurements. Women in the highest quartile of added sugar intake had significantly increased endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.16-2.92). Among women with waist-to-hip ratio ≥0.85, risk was significantly higher for the highest versus lowest tertile of added sugar intakes (OR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.38-4.52). The association with added sugar also became stronger when analyses were restricted to never users of hormone replacement therapy (OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.27-3.26, for highest versus lowest tertile). There was little evidence of effect modification by body mass index or physical activity. Given the high prevalence of intake of sugary foods and drinks in Western populations, additional research is warranted to confirm our findings on endometrial cancer.


Subject(s)
Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Dietary Carbohydrates/adverse effects , Dietary Sucrose/administration & dosage , Dietary Sucrose/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Waist-Hip Ratio
15.
Annu Rev Nutr ; 33: 319-48, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701588

ABSTRACT

Laboratory evidence suggests a plausible role for dietary fat in breast cancer pathophysiology. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the epidemiological evidence on the impact of total dietary fat and fat subtypes, measured pre- and/or postcancer diagnosis, in relation to breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among breast cancer survivors. Studies were included if they were in English, had a sample size ≥200, and presented the hazard ratio/rate ratio for recurrence, disease-specific mortality, or all-cause mortality (n = 18). Although the results are mixed, most studies suggested that higher saturated fat intake prediagnosis was associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Postdiagnostic trans fat intake was associated with a 45% and 78% increased risk of all-cause mortality. Higher monounsaturated fat intake before and after diagnosis was generally associated with increased risk of all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, albeit the majority of the studies were statistically nonsignificant. Two studies evaluating omega-3 fat intake suggested an inverse association with all-cause mortality. Although there were too few studies on fat subtypes to draw definitive conclusions, high consumption of saturated fat may exert a detrimental effect on breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, whereas omega-3 fat may be beneficial. The inconsistent and limited evidence warrants research to assess the impact of consumption of fat subtypes on breast cancer recurrence and mortality.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Diet, High-Fat/adverse effects , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , DNA Damage , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Obesity/etiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Oxidative Stress , Prognosis
16.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(5): 989-1004, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23456270

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The majority of previous studies have observed an increased risk of mucinous ovarian tumors associated with cigarette smoking, but the association with other histological types is unclear. In a large pooled analysis, we examined the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer associated with multiple measures of cigarette smoking with a focus on characterizing risks according to tumor behavior and histology. METHODS: We used data from 21 case-control studies of ovarian cancer (19,066 controls, 11,972 invasive and 2,752 borderline cases). Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from logistic regression models and combined into a pooled odds ratio using a random effects model. RESULTS: Current cigarette smoking increased the risk of invasive mucinous (OR = 1.31; 95 % CI: 1.03-1.65) and borderline mucinous ovarian tumors (OR = 1.83; 95 % CI: 1.39-2.41), while former smoking increased the risk of borderline serous ovarian tumors (OR = 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.12-1.50). For these histological types, consistent dose-response associations were observed. No convincing associations between smoking and risk of invasive serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer were observed, while our results provided some evidence of a decreased risk of invasive clear cell ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed marked differences in the risk profiles of histological types of ovarian cancer with regard to cigarette smoking, although the magnitude of the observed associations was modest. Our findings, which may reflect different etiologies of the histological types, add to the fact that ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/etiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
17.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 94, 2013 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer in the US. The consumption of refined sugars has increased dramatically over the past few decades, accounting for almost 15% of total energy intake. Yet, there is limited evidence on how sugar consumption affects ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: We evaluated ovarian cancer risk in relation to sugary foods and beverages, and total and added sugar intakes in a population-based case-control study. Cases were women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer, older than 21 years, able to speak English or Spanish, and residents of six counties in New Jersey. Controls met same criteria as cases, but were ineligible if they had both ovaries removed. A total of 205 cases and 390 controls completed a phone interview, food frequency questionnaire, and self-recorded waist and hip measurements. Based on dietary data, we computed the number of servings of dessert foods, non-dessert foods, sugary drinks and total sugary foods and drinks for each participant. Total and added sugar intakes (grams/day) were also calculated. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for food and drink groups and total and added sugar intakes, while adjusting for major risk factors. RESULTS: We did not find evidence of an association between consumption of sugary foods and beverages and risk, although there was a suggestion of increased risk associated with sugary drink intake (servings per 1,000 kcal; OR=1.63, 95% CI: 0.94-2.83). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found little indication that sugar intake played a major role on ovarian cancer development.


Subject(s)
Dietary Sucrose/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Beverages/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Case-Control Studies , Diet Records , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , New Jersey/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
18.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 28, 2013 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23339562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the association between alcohol intake and ovarian carcinoma (OC) are inconsistent. Because OC and ovarian borderline tumor histologic types differ genetically, molecularly and clinically, large numbers are needed to estimate risk associations. METHODS: We pooled data from 12 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium comprising 5,342 OC cases, 1,455 borderline tumors and 10,358 controls with quantitative information on recent alcohol intake to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to frequencies of average daily intakes of beer, wine, liquor and total alcohol. RESULTS: Total alcohol intake was not associated with all OC: consumption of >3 drinks per day compared to none, OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.76-1.10, P trend=0.27. Among beverage types, a statistically non-significant decreased risk was observed among women who consumed >8 oz/d of wine compared to none (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.68-1.01, P trend=0.08). This association was more apparent among women with clear cell OC (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.83; P trend=0.02), although based on only 10 cases and not statistically different from the other histologic types (P value for statistical heterogeneity between histologic types = 0.09). Statistical heterogeneity of the alcohol- and wine-OC associations was seen among three European studies, but not among eight North American studies. No statistically significant associations were observed in separate analyses evaluating risk with borderline tumors of serous or mucinous histology. Smoking status did not significantly modify any of the associations. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that recent moderate alcohol drinking is associated with increased risk for overall OC, or that variation in risk is associated strongly with specific histologic types. Understanding modifiable causes of these elusive and deadly cancers remains a priority for the research community.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Carcinoma/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholic Beverages/adverse effects , Australia/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Carcinoma/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
19.
Matern Child Health J ; 17(1): 165-71, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22322430

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper was to investigate the association between birthweight and prevalence of food allergies using a national sample of US children. Adult report of birthweight and child food allergies were obtained for years 2005-2009 from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional household survey of the US population. A total of 51,748 children aged 0-17 years were included in the analyses representing over 73 million children. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between birthweight categories and food allergies stratified by age and gender; accounting for the complex design of NHIS. Children aged 6-12 years who were born very low birthweight (500-1,499 g) were more likely to have reported food allergy compared to referent (3,000-3,499 g), OR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.02-2.91. However, there was no clear trend of an association between birthweight and food allergy with increasing or decreasing birthweight across all ages. Estimates were generally stronger in younger male children as compared to estimates in females of the same age group. Marginal associations for respiratory allergy (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.02-2.29) and hay fever (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 0.93-2.54) were observed among very low birthweight children aged 0-5 years. There was limited evidence for a clear association between birthweight and food allergy. Marginal associations observed in children weighing 500-1,499 g at birth support efforts to minimize preterm births and very low birthweight given the increase in pediatric food allergies and the large number of children born low birthweight each year in the US.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Nutrition Surveys , Odds Ratio , Premature Birth , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
20.
Annu Rev Nutr ; 32: 311-42, 2012 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22540252

ABSTRACT

Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for several cancers, its role on cancer survival is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the current evidence evaluating the impact of body adiposity on the prognosis of the three most common obesity-related cancers: prostate, colorectal, and breast. We included 33 studies of breast cancer, six studies of prostate cancer, and eight studies of colo-rectal cancer. We note that the evidence overrepresents breast cancer survivorship research and is sparse for prostate and colorectal cancers. Overall, most studies support a relationship between body adiposity and site-specific mortality or cancer progression. However, most of the research was not specifically designed to study these outcomes and, therefore, several methodological issues should be considered before integrating their results to draw conclusions. Further research is urgently warranted to assess the long-term impact of obesity among the growing population of cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Obesity/complications , Adiposity , Biomedical Research , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Research Design
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...