Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28094216

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the significance of mild and moderate dysplasia at the surgical margin with regard to survival and locoregional recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated cases of primary oral squamous cell carcinoma with negative margins retrospectively from the database of a tertiary cancer hospital. All patients had been treated between January 2010 and December 2012, and margin dysplasia was investigated in a multivariate analysis for locoregional recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS: Of a total of 425 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 28 patients had mild dysplasia, and 29 patients had moderate dysplasia; median period of follow-up was 46.63 ± 10.04 (standard deviation) months. Most of the patients with mild and moderate dysplasia in the margin were tobacco users (P = .007). Univariate analysis showed lower rates of survival among the patients with margin dysplasia (mild + moderate) (P = .043), and the multivariate cox regression revealed moderate dysplasia at the margin as an independent significant factor for survival (P < .0001) when adjusted with other cofounders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mild or moderate dysplasia at surgical margin were often tobacco users, and moderate dysplasia in the margin is an independent significant indicator for survival of patients with oral cancer in this single-institution, retrospective study.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
2.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 14(3): 599-604, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26225050

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studies have reported 20 % of conventional squamous cell carcinoma in patients with verrucous carcinoma (VC), later these cancers were termed as hybrid VC. It is important to distinguish both while planning treatment since hybrid VC requires addressing regional lymphatics in addition to respective surgery. Information on odds of missing the foci of invasion on routine incision biopsy might be useful in this regard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of all the patients surgically treated for oral cancer from Jan 2010 to Oct 2013 in a Tertiary Cancer Centre was analyzed. Patients diagnosed with primary VC or Verrucous Hyperplasia on incision biopsy were included in the study. Proportion of patients undiagnosed for invasive component on incision biopsy was calculated, multivariate analysis of the sample was performed to find associated cofounders. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients who reported with the diagnosis of VC (n = 53) or Verrucous Hyperplasia (n = 2) on incision biopsy were included in the study. Twenty-seven were diagnosed as VC and 28 as hybrid VC after excision. This corresponded to 51 % (n = 28) of cases missing invasive component on incision biopsy. VC was significantly more commonly seen in lip and in buccal mucosa, hybrid VC was more commonly seen in tongue and gingiva and this association was statistically significant (p = 0.031) in our study. CONCLUSION: Incision biopsy is extremely unreliable to diagnose and differentiate oral Hybrid VC from VC or Verrucous Hyperplasia. Caution is required while planning treatment of these patients regarding possibility of presence of conventional squamous cell carcinoma within these tumors.

3.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 67(Suppl 1): 86-90, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25621260

ABSTRACT

Complex anatomy of oral cavity makes it difficult for a surgeon to assess margins of oral cancer accurately and positive margins compromise loco regional disease control, thus surgeon may rely on frozen section assessment for marginal status. We discussed the prognostic value of frozen section in early carcinoma of oral cavity. 90 patients with pT1 and pT2 oral cavity cancer operated from January 2010 to December 2011 under single consultant surgeon were retrospectively evaluated. Log rank test and multivariate cox regression model was used for testing frozen section against the survival and recurrence free status. Survival of patients with positive or negative frozen section was significant (p = 0.037), Survival of patients with positive or negative histology report was significant (p = 0.004), however; prognosis of patients with positive margins despite revision under frozen control was poorer to the patients with negative margin. Frozen section assessment is accurate but their use in the surgery of oral cavity cancer might not improve loco regional disease control or survival when used routinely.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...