ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) perioperative outcomes and consider how age may be related to overall survival in an integrated health system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 309 patients who underwent PD between December 2008 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: aged 75 y or less and more than 75 y, defined as senior surgical patients. Univariate and multivariable analyses of predictive clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival at 5 y were performed. RESULTS: In both groups, the majority underwent PD for malignant disease. The proportion of senior surgical patients alive at 5 y was 33.3% compared to 53.6% of younger patients (P = 0.003). There were also statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to body mass index, cancer antigen 19-9, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Charlson comorbidity index. On multivariable analysis, disease type, cancer antigen 19-9, hemoglobin A1c, length of surgery, length of stay, Charlson comorbidity index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were found to be statistically significant factors for overall survival. Age was not significantly related to overall survival on multivariable logistic regression and when the analysis was limited to pancreatic cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in overall survival between patients aged less than and more than 75 years was significant, age was not an independent risk factor for overall survival on multivariable analysis. Rather than a patient's chronological age, his/her physiologic age including medical comorbidities and functional status may be more correlated to overall survival.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare sarcoma of the blood vessels. We report a patient with vascular EHE with delayed pulmonary metastasis, of which there are no previously known case reports. Case Description: A 40-year-old female presents with a painful right groin mass and swelling in the lower extremity. A 3.8 cm soft tissue mass was identified in the femoral sheath with the abutment of the femoral artery on a computerized tomography (CT) scan. Surgical resection of the femoral vein was performed, and the final pathology confirmed a diagnosis of EHE. A second en-bloc resection of the femoral artery with bypass grafting was performed with clear surgical margins. The patient did well post-operatively with annual surveillance of the right groin as well as chest X-rays. However, the patient developed a metastatic Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) to the right lower lobe, 12 years after the initial EHE treatment. She underwent a pulmonary resection with clear margins. The patient remains disease-free after one year. EHE is a rare soft tissue sarcoma with unpredictable clinical behavior. While most commonly presenting in the lung and liver they can also originate from any vascular system. Delayed pulmonary metastasis from vascular EHE has not been reported. Conclusions: Our case shows that indolent metastasis can occur in EHE, despite a prolonged disease-free interval. This case highlights the need for long-term surveillance with serial imaging of not only the primary site but pulmonary imaging beyond 5 years may be beneficial.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of a virtual multidisciplinary sarcoma case conference (VMSCC) on the outcomes of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). METHODS: We compared margin status after surgery and disease-free survival (DFS) on two cohorts of patients with DFSP, one diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 and one from 2016 to 2020 (before and after virtual multidisciplinary sarcoma case conference (VMSCC) within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two cohorts on demographics, tumor location, type of surgery, receipt of radiation, receipt of imatinib, or size of tumor. However, the percent of patients with positive margin after final surgery and the percent of local recurrence were significantly different: 6.5% and 6.3% for the 2010-2015 cohort, and .8% and 0% for the 2016-2020 cohort, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the outcomes of DFSP improved significantly after the implementation of VMSCC.
