Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transl Psychiatry ; 6(9): e887, 2016 09 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27622931

ABSTRACT

Prior studies have proposed a wide range of potential biological risk factors for future suicidal behaviors. Although strong evidence exists for biological correlates of suicidal behaviors, it remains unclear if these correlates are also risk factors for suicidal behaviors. We performed a meta-analysis to integrate the existing literature on biological risk factors for suicidal behaviors and to determine their statistical significance. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo and Google Scholar for studies that used a biological factor to predict either suicide attempt or death by suicide. Inclusion criteria included studies with at least one longitudinal analysis using a biological factor to predict either of these outcomes in any population through 2015. From an initial screen of 2541 studies we identified 94 cases. Random effects models were used for both meta-analyses and meta-regression. The combined effect of biological factors produced statistically significant but relatively weak prediction of suicide attempts (weighted mean odds ratio (wOR)=1.41; CI: 1.09-1.81) and suicide death (wOR=1.28; CI: 1.13-1.45). After accounting for publication bias, prediction was nonsignificant for both suicide attempts and suicide death. Only two factors remained significant after accounting for publication bias-cytokines (wOR=2.87; CI: 1.40-5.93) and low levels of fish oil nutrients (wOR=1.09; CI: 1.01-1.19). Our meta-analysis revealed that currently known biological factors are weak predictors of future suicidal behaviors. This conclusion should be interpreted within the context of the limitations of the existing literature, including long follow-up intervals and a lack of tests of interactions with other risk factors. Future studies addressing these limitations may more effectively test for potential biological risk factors.


Subject(s)
Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure , Cholesterol/blood , Dietary Fats , Fatty Acids/metabolism , Humans , Neurotransmitter Agents/cerebrospinal fluid , Oxytocin/blood , Oxytocin/cerebrospinal fluid , Receptors, Serotonin/genetics , Risk Factors , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Tryptophan Hydroxylase/genetics , Vital Capacity
3.
Psychol Med ; 46(2): 225-36, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26370729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A history of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) is consistently cited as one of the strongest predictors of future suicidal behavior. However, stark discrepancies in the literature raise questions about the true magnitude of these associations. The objective of this study is to examine the magnitude and clinical utility of the associations between SITBs and subsequent suicide ideation, attempts, and death. METHOD: We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar for papers published through December 2014. Inclusion required that studies include at least one longitudinal analysis predicting suicide ideation, attempts, or death using any SITB variable. We identified 2179 longitudinal studies; 172 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The most common outcome was suicide attempt (47.80%), followed by death (40.50%) and ideation (11.60%). Median follow-up was 52 months (mean = 82.52, s.d. = 102.29). Overall prediction was weak, with weighted mean odds ratios (ORs) of 2.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-2.43] for ideation, 2.14 (95% CI 2.00-2.30) for attempts, and 1.54 (95% CI 1.39-1.71) for death. Adjusting for publication bias further reduced estimates. Diagnostic accuracy analyses indicated acceptable specificity (86-87%) and poor sensitivity (10-26%), with areas under the curve marginally above chance (0.60-0.62). Most risk factors generated OR estimates of <2.0 and no risk factor exceeded 4.5. Effects were consistent regardless of sample severity, sample age groups, or follow-up length. CONCLUSIONS: Prior SITBs confer risk for later suicidal thoughts and behaviors. However, they only provide a marginal improvement in diagnostic accuracy above chance. Addressing gaps in study design, assessment, and underlying mechanisms may prove useful in improving prediction and prevention of suicidal thoughts and behaviors.


Subject(s)
Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Mortality , Risk Factors , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicide/psychology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/psychology
4.
Skin Therapy Lett ; 19(3): 1-4, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25188361

ABSTRACT

Rosacea is a common, chronic cutaneous condition that affects the face. Two topicals and one oral medication are currently approved for the treatment of rosacea, including azelaic acid, metronidazole, and sub-antimicrobial dose of doxycycline. Identification of subtypes can help guide treatment strategies. It is essential for psychosocial implications of rosacea to be considered and conservative management, such as nonpharmacologic routine skin care, must form an important part of the overall care. Recently, new insights into the pathophysiology of rosacea have led to the emergence of etiologically oriented treatments. Ivermectin, an acaricidal agent that has been shown to be effective against rosacea refractory to other therapies, is currently in Phase 3 trials. Brimonidine, which was US FDA approved last year and recently sanctioned by Health Canada, has filled an essential therapeutic void in the targeted treatment of diffuse facial erythema.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Design , Erythema/drug therapy , Rosacea/drug therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/pharmacology , Erythema/etiology , Humans , Rosacea/physiopathology , Skin Care/methods
6.
J Abnorm Psychol ; 110(3): 433-42, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11502086

ABSTRACT

This study examined 2-point discrimination performance in 1 st-degree biological relatives (n = 39) of individuals with schizophrenia and normal adult control participants (n = 30) recruited from the community. They completed an objective 2-point discrimination task, adapted for use with a signal detection approach to permit separation of discriminability (i.e., sensitivity, d') from response bias/ criterion (or motivation, lnbeta). Relatives revealed poorer performance on the d' index compared with controls. The 2 groups did not differ on lnbeta, suggesting a genuine difference in sensitivity but not response bias. The sensitivity deficit might reflect decreased spatial acuity and/or impaired intensity cue processing of tactile stimuli. Poor performance on the d' index was most closely associated with 2 schizotypic features, namely "odd beliefs/magical thinking."


Subject(s)
Discrimination, Psychological , Family/psychology , Schizophrenia/genetics , Schizophrenic Psychology , Signal Detection, Psychological , Touch , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sensory Thresholds
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...