Prevalence of ocular and orbital injuries in polytrauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Polytrauma patients usually suffer from both life-threatening injuries, where early intervention is mandatory in order to prevent mortality from uncontrollable haemorrhage-especially during the "golden hour", and secondary injuries of lower priority which receive delayed referral or treatment. Non-life-threatening injuries can sometimes be overlooked and so remain untreated until a much later stage. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of eye (ocular and orbital) injuries in polytrauma (injury severity score >15) patients and describe their complexities and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 10-year period (1991-2001), all polytrauma patients admitted in our institution were evaluated. Patients with ocular and orbital injuries were identified and their records were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Out of a total of 2,985 polytrauma patients, 222 (7.5%) met the inclusion criteria. Forty-one case notes were not retraceable. The files of 181 patients were therefore available for review. The mean age of this group of patients was 33 years (3-84) with a sex ratio (male: female ratio) 5:1. The types of eye injuries encountered were orbital wall fractures (61%), periorbital swelling or hematoma (46%), sub-conjunctival hemorrhage (23%), periorbital lacerations (22%), optic nerve trauma (11%) and penetrating eye injuries (6%). Visual impairment resulted in about 67% of survivors, including loss of eye in 24%. Diplopia requiring intervention was seen in 24% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Polytrauma patients are at high risk for vision-threatening injuries, and an early multidisciplinary approach is essential for early detection and treatment.

Is this really a capillary haemangioma?

Periocular tumours in newborn babies are not uncommon and their diagnosis and management can be challenging. Capillary haemangioma is the most common of them and superficial ones are easy to recognise. Deep-seated (orbital) lesions can mimic various other orbital mass lesions - dermoid cysts, cellulitis, lymphangioma and the more serious rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma. A careful elicitation of history, physical examination, and appropriate orbital imaging (ultrasound for superficial ones and magnetic resonance imaging/angiography for deep-seated lesions) helps in the diagnosis. This is a brief report of a very large vascular lesion involving the lower lid with very atypical clinical features. The approach to diagnosis and successful treatment and the histological features are discussed.

Twenty year review of histopathological findings in enucleated/eviscerated eyes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the need for routine histopathological analysis of enucleated/eviscerated eyes and changes in indications for eye removal. METHODS: Retrospective review of all enucleation/evisceration histopathology reports over 20 years. Clinical history was correlated with pathological findings. Two 10 year periods (1984-93, 1994-2003) were compared to detect changes in indications for eye removal. RESULTS: In total, 285 histopathology results were traced from 1984 to 2003; 161 and 124 were evisceration and enucleation specimens, respectively. Glaucoma, malignant melanoma, trauma, and retinal detachment were the most frequent diagnoses 1984-1993. Ocular trauma was the most frequent diagnosis 1994-2003, followed by phthisis bulbi and endophthalmitis. Three cases were diagnosed as metastatic carcinoma; all were suspected preoperatively. A fourth case was a diagnostic surprise: adenocarcinoma found in an eye removed for pain and phthisis. Comparison of two 10 year periods showed a decrease in the number of enucleations/eviscerations, perhaps reflecting a decrease in the number of specimens sent. A preference for eviscerations was evident over the 20 years. CONCLUSION: The number of eyes removed and histologically analysed decreased in the period 1994 to 2003, perhaps because of better treatment options, allowing globe preservation. There was a significant shift in the diagnosis in the two time periods, and a preference for evisceration in both. Only one diagnostic surprise was discovered (0.35%). This study does not support the need to send all globes/contents for histopathological examination. However, because of the one unexpected finding, it is recommended where the examination is incomplete or the history of visual loss is unclear.