ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that cervical interlaminar steroid injection (CIESI) is more effective in treating radicular pain than axial neck pain, but without direct comparison. And the differences of effect after CIESI according to MRI findings are inconsistent. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the therapeutic response of CIESI according to pain sites, durations, MRI findings, and other predictive factors altogether, unlike previous studies, which evaluated them separately. METHODS: The medical records of 128 patients who received fluoroscopy guided CIESI were analyzed. We evaluated the therapeutic response (more than a 50% reduction on the visual analog scale [VAS] by their second visit) after CIESI by (1) pain site; neck pain without radicular pain/radicular pain with or without neck pain, (2) pain duration; acute/chronic (more than 6 month), and (3) findings of MRI; herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD)/spinal stenosis, respectively and altogether. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (68%) responded to CIESI, and there were no significant differences in demographic data, initial VAS score, or laboratory findings. And there were no significant differences in the response rate relating to pain site, pain duration, or MRI findings, respectively. In additional analysis, acute radicular pain with HIVD patients showed significantly better response than chronic neck pain with spinal stenosis (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We cannot find any sole predictive factor of therapeutic response to the CIESI. But the patients having acute radicular pain with HIVD showed the best response, and those having other chronic neck pain showed the worst response to CIESI.
ABSTRACT
A 26-year-old parturient with Eisenmenger's syndrome and complete atrioventricular block was presented for emergency Cesarean section due to preterm labor. Ventricular tachycardia (VT), which progressed to ventricular fibrillation (VF), started immediately after the incision. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with electric shocks was given by anesthesiologists while the obstetrician delivered the baby between the shocks. A cardiac surgeon was ready for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation institution in case of emergency but spontaneous circulation of the patient returned after the 3rd shock and the delivery of the baby. The newborn's Apgar score was 4 at 1 minute and 8 at 5 minutes. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted before the discharge because the patient had recurrent episodes of VT and VF postoperatively.
ABSTRACT
There have been several reports of gas embolism occurring during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) surgery. However, all these cases of air embolism were associated with the repair of venous circulation, using a CO(2) blower. In this report, we describe a rare case of air embolism in the coronary arteries associated with the use of a CO(2) blower during OPCAB. There was no injury to the veins during OPCAB. The air embolism was treated successfully with cardiopulmonary bypass.
ABSTRACT
We aimed to assess the predictive value of fibrin-based thromboelastometry performed before weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cryoprecipitate administered to correct the bleeding diathesis after CPB involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Eleven patients undergoing aortic surgery were enrolled. The arterial blood was withdrawn before skin incision, 30 min before CPB weaning (Cweaning), 5 min after protamine reversal (Preversal) and at closure of the sternum to run intrinsically activated INTEM, heparinase-treated HEPTEM, extrinsically activated EXTEM and platelet-inhibited FIBTEM analysis, platelet count, fibrinogen, prothrombin time (international normalized ratio) and activated partial thromboplastin time. The predicted value of FIBTEM A10 obtained during CPB for cryoprecipitate transfusion at Preversal was calculated. The cut-off points for FIBTEM A10 to reflect fibrinogen of 200 mg/dl at Preversal were 5 mm (P = 0.15). FIBTEM A10 at Preversal and Cweaning showed correlations as follows: FIBTEM A10 at Preversal = 0.02 + 1.42 × FIBTEM A10 at Cweaning (r² = 0.80). The cut-off value for FIBTEM A10 at Cweaning to determine whether to prepare cryoprecipitate in advance during CPB was calculated to be 3 mm, and the positive and negative predictability for FIBTEM A10 of 3 or less versus more than 3 at Cweaning for the necessity of cryoprecipitate transfusion at Preversal (A10 ≤ 5 versus > 5) were 100 and 80%, respectively. This study showed that fibrinogen reflected in FIBTEM during pump can be used to estimate FIBTEM after Preversal and the amount of cryoprecipitate needed for replacing mainly the fibrinogen could be predicted with high sensitivity and specificity.
